Assembly-History Dynamics of a Pitcher-Plant Protozoan Community in Experimental Microcosms

Background History drives community assembly through differences both in density (density effects) and in the sequence in which species arrive (sequence effects). Density effects arise from predictable population dynamics, which are free of history, but sequence effects are due to a density-free mechanism, arising solely from the order and timing of immigration events. Few studies have determined how components of immigration history (timing, number of individuals, frequency) alter local dynamics to determine community assembly, beyond addressing when immigration history produces historically contingent assembly. Methods/Findings We varied density and sequence effects independently in a two-way factorial design to follow community assembly in a three-species aquatic protozoan community. A superior competitor, Colpoda steinii, mediated alternative community states; early arrival or high introduction density allowed this species to outcompete or suppress the other competitors (Poterioochromonas malhamensis and Eimeriidae gen. sp.). Multivariate analysis showed that density effects caused greater variation in community states, whereas sequence effects altered the mean community composition. Conclusions A significant interaction between density and sequence effects suggests that we should refine our understanding of priority effects. These results highlight a practical need to understand not only the “ingredients” (species) in ecological communities but their “recipes” as well.

[1]  A. Hastings,et al.  Ecosystem engineering in space and time. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[2]  T. Fukami,et al.  Assembly history dictates ecosystem functioning: evidence from wood decomposer communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[3]  A. J. Lotka.  Elements of Physical Biology. , 1925, Nature.

[4]  J. Connell,et al.  Mechanisms of Succession in Natural Communities and Their Role in Community Stability and Organization , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[5]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[6]  Testing successional hypotheses of stability, heterogeneity, and diversity in pitcher-plant inquiline communities , 2012, Oecologia.

[7]  Don A. Driscoll,et al.  Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities , 2006 .

[8]  James A. Drake,et al.  Community-Assembly Mechanics and the Structure of an Experimental Species Ensemble , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[9]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Communities , 1976, Nature.

[10]  James F. Robinson,et al.  Does invasion sequence affect community structure. , 1987 .

[11]  J. Lawton,et al.  Experimental studies on community convergence and alternative stable states: Comments on a paper by Drake et al. , 1994 .

[12]  B. Shorrocks,et al.  Priority effects and species coexistence: experiments with fungal-breeding Drosophila , 1994 .

[13]  David M. Wood,et al.  The Role of Lupine in Succession on Mount St. Helens: Facilitation or Inhibition? , 1989 .

[14]  H. Reynolds,et al.  Perturbations alter community convergence, divergence, and formation of multiple community states. , 2008, Ecology.

[15]  T. Fukami.  ASSEMBLY HISTORY INTERACTS WITH ECOSYSTEM SIZE TO INFLUENCE SPECIES DIVERSITY , 2004 .

[16]  J. H. Burns,et al.  EFFECT OF COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ON INVASION SUCCESS AND RATE , 2002 .

[17]  Mathew A. Leibold,et al.  Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities , 2005 .

[18]  M. Schroeder,et al.  Long-term priority effects among insects and fungi colonizing decaying wood , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[19]  T. Palmer,et al.  Burning bridges: priority effects and the persistence of a competitively subordinate acacia-ant in Laikipia, Kenya , 2002, Oecologia.

[20]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Alternative stable states and regional community structure. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  A. J. Lotka,et al.  Elements of Physical Biology. , 1925, Nature.

[22]  Veijo Kaitala,et al.  Population dynamic consequences of delayed life-history effects , 2002 .

[23]  Sharon K Collinge,et al.  Transient patterns in the assembly of vernal pool plant communities. , 2009, Ecology.

[24]  W. Schaffer.  ECOLOGICAL ABSTRACTION: THE CONSEQUENCES OF REDUCED DIMENSIONALITY IN ECOLOGICAL MODELS' , 1981 .

[25]  P. Legendre,et al.  vegan : Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.8-5 , 2007 .

[26]  M. C. Urban.  Disturbance heterogeneity determines freshwater metacommunity structure , 2004 .

[27]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[28]  Tadashi Fukami,et al.  Community assembly: alternative stable states or alternative transient states? , 2011, Ecology letters.

[29]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[30]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance in ecology , 2001 .

[31]  K. Peay,et al.  Root tip competition among ectomycorrhizal fungi: are priority effects a rule or an exception? , 2009, Ecology.

[32]  Jonathan M. Chase.  Community assembly: when should history matter? , 2003, Oecologia.

[33]  R. Alford,et al.  Priority effects in experimental pond communities: responses of Hyla to Bufo and Rana , 1985 .

[34]  P. Petraitis,et al.  Divergent succession and implications for alternative states on rocky intertidal shores , 2005 .