A Phase II Study of 3′-Deoxy-3′-18F-Fluorothymidine PET in the Assessment of Early Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results from ACRIN 6688

Our objective was to determine whether early change in standardized uptake values (SUVs) of 3′deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) using PET with CT could predict pathologic complete response (pCR) of primary breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The key secondary objective was to correlate SUV with the proliferation marker Ki-67 at baseline and after NAC. Methods: This prospective, multicenter phase II study did not specify the therapeutic regimen, thus, NAC varied among centers. All evaluable patients underwent 18F-FLT PET/CT at baseline (FLT1) and after 1 cycle of NAC (FLT2); 43 patients were imaged at FLT1, FLT2, and after NAC completion (FLT3). The percentage change in maximum SUV (%ΔSUVmax) between FLT1 and FLT2 and FLT3 was calculated for the primary tumors. The predictive value of ΔSUVmax for pCR was determined using receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis. The correlation between SUVmax and Ki-67 was also assessed. Results: Fifty-one of 90 recruited patients (median age, 54 y; stage IIA–IIIC) met the eligibility criteria for the primary objective analysis, with an additional 22 patients totaling 73 patients for secondary analyses. A pCR in the primary breast cancer was achieved in 9 of 51 patients. NAC resulted in a significant reduction in %SUVmax (mean Δ, 39%; 95% confidence interval, 31–46). There was a marginal difference in %ΔSUVmax_FLT1-FLT2 between pCR and no-pCR patient groups (Wilcoxon 1-sided P = 0.050). The area under the curve for ΔSUVmax in the prediction of pCR was 0.68 (90% confidence interval, 0.50–0.83; Delong 1-sided P = 0.05), with slightly better predictive value for percentage mean SUV (P = 0.02) and similar prediction for peak SUV (P = 0.04). There was a weak correlation with pretherapy SUVmax and Ki-67 (r = 0.29, P = 0.04), but the correlation between SUVmax and Ki-67 after completion of NAC was stronger (r = 0.68, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: 18F-FLT PET imaging of breast cancer after 1 cycle of NAC weakly predicted pCR in the setting of variable NAC regimens. Posttherapy 18F-FLT uptake correlated with Ki-67 on surgical specimens. These results suggest some efficacy of 18F-FLT as an indicator of early therapeutic response of breast cancer to NAC and support future multicenter studies to test 18F-FLT PET in a more uniformly treated patient population.

[1]  S. Shousha,et al.  Quantification of cellular proliferation in tumor and normal tissues of patients with breast cancer by [18F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography imaging: evaluation of analytical methods. , 2005, Cancer research.

[2]  J. Bading,et al.  Imaging of Cell Proliferation: Status and Prospects , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  M. Brennan,et al.  Locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer. , 2005, Australian family physician.

[4]  J. Olson,et al.  Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype--ACOSOG Z1031. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  S Detre,et al.  Evaluation of FLT-PET-CT as an imaging biomarker of proliferation in primary breast cancer , 2014, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  J. Martí-Climent,et al.  [¹⁸F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography in patients with locally advanced breast cancer under bevacizumab treatment: usefulness of different quantitative methods of tumor proliferation. , 2014, Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular.

[7]  M. Hatt,et al.  Early assessment with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography can help predict the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer. , 2014, European journal of cancer.

[8]  Eric O. Aboagye,et al.  Imaging early changes in proliferation at 1 week post chemotherapy: a pilot study in breast cancer patients with 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  Winfried Brenner,et al.  Monitoring primary systemic therapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer by using sequential positron emission tomography imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  J. Jacob,et al.  Monitoring early response to taxane therapy in advanced breast cancer with circulating tumor cells and [(18)F] 3´-deoxy-3´-fluorothymidine PET: a pilot study. , 2012, Biomarkers in medicine.

[11]  P. Fumoleau,et al.  [18F]FDG-PET predicts complete pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  W. Youden,et al.  Index for rating diagnostic tests , 1950, Cancer.

[13]  J. Bonneterre,et al.  Predictive value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy failure in breast cancer using FDG–PET after the first course , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[14]  J. Bergh,et al.  A phase II study of epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer. , 2007, European journal of cancer.

[15]  Z. Chang,et al.  Differential phosphorylation of human thymidine kinase in proliferating and M phase-arrested human cells. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  E. Perez,et al.  Phase III comparison of standard doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus weekly doxorubicin and daily oral cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as neoadjuvant therapy for inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancer: SWOG 0012. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Qualification of PET Scanners for Use in Multicenter Cancer Clinical Trials: The American College of Radiology Imaging Network Experience , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  A. Bianco,et al.  c-erb B2 overexpression decreases the benefit of adjuvant tamoxifen in early-stage breast cancer without axillary lymph node metastases. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  M. Hatt,et al.  Comparison Between 18F-FDG PET Image–Derived Indices for Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  R. Thomas,et al.  Weekly cisplatin, epirubicin, and paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support vs triweekly epirubicin and paclitaxel in locally advanced breast cancer: final analysis of a sicog phase III study , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[21]  B. Munch‐Petersen,et al.  Human thymidine kinase 1. Regulation in normal and malignant cells. , 1995, Advances in enzyme regulation.

[22]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[23]  Federico Turkheimer,et al.  [18F]-3′Deoxy-3′-Fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography and Breast Cancer Response to Docetaxel , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[24]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  Usefulness of 3′-[F-18]Fluoro-3′-deoxythymidine with Positron Emission Tomography in Predicting Breast Cancer Response to Therapy , 2005, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[25]  Christos Hatzis,et al.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[27]  F. Turkheimer,et al.  Kinetic filtering of [18F]Fluorothymidine in positron emission tomography studies , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  P. Marsden,et al.  Correlation between Ki-67 immunohistochemistry and 18F-fluorothymidine uptake in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[29]  M. Sormani,et al.  Pathologic complete response as a potential surrogate for the clinical outcome in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-regression of 29 randomized prospective studies. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  F E Turkheimer,et al.  Quantification of intra-tumour cell proliferation heterogeneity using imaging descriptors of 18F fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Ludovic Ferrer,et al.  Monitoring of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  Irene L Andrulis,et al.  HER2 and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemotherapy. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  Otto Muzik,et al.  Imaging proliferation in vivo with [F-18]FLT and positron emission tomography , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[34]  Christian Ingvar,et al.  Ki67 proliferation in core biopsies versus surgical samples - a model for neo-adjuvant breast cancer studies , 2011, BMC Cancer.

[35]  J. Christensen,et al.  [18F]FLT–PET Imaging Does Not Always “Light Up” Proliferating Tumor Cells , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[36]  Gideon Blumenthal,et al.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[37]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer working group. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.