Television is happening

The more fragmented that engagements with the media become, the more important it is to understand changing audience practices for theories of social shaping. However, capturing the ways in which audiences respond to television is challenging when current technology makes new demands on the viewer: digital television packages offer 'interactive' choices coterminous with computer interfaces. This article proposes a new methodology and demonstrates the kind of data that it makes available for studying digital television audiences. It suggests adapting the traditional metaphor of 'flow' and combining an understanding of television-as-text with television-as-technology to explore the social contexts of new textual possibilities against the backdrop of claims made about 'new media' . This is achieved by allowing the phenomenological aspects of television to inform an empirical study of television in sociocommunicative contexts. Locating mediated communication within everyday social interaction invites questions about what is new about the social shaping of the digital TV interface.

[1]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  New Media, New Audiences? , 1999, New Media Soc..

[2]  Shaun Moores,et al.  The Doubling of Place: Electronic Media, Time-Space Arrangements and Social Relationships , 2004 .

[3]  J. Bolter,et al.  Remediation: Understanding New Media , 1999 .

[4]  Helen Wood.  The mediated conversational floor: an interactive approach to audience reception analysis , 2007 .

[5]  N. Browne.  The political economy of the television (super) text , 1984 .

[6]  J. Peters.  Media as conversation, conversation as media , 2006 .

[7]  D. Morley.  The Nationwide Audience , 1980 .

[8]  Pyungho Kim,et al.  A machine-like new medium - theoretical examination of interactive TV , 2002 .

[9]  Marie Gillespie,et al.  Television, ethnicity, and cultural change , 1995 .

[10]  D. Morley.  Home Territories: Media, Mobility and Identity , 2000 .

[11]  Ann Gray.  Video Playtime: The Gendering of a Leisure Technology , 1992 .

[12]  John Ellis,et al.  Seeing Things: Television in the Age of Uncertainty , 2000 .

[13]  Shaun Moores,et al.  `The box on the dresser': memories of early radio and everyday life , 1988 .

[14]  A. Giddens.  The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[15]  Shaun Moores,et al.  Texts, readers and contexts of reading: developments in the study of media audiences , 1990 .

[16]  H. Wheatley.  The Limits of Television? , 2004 .

[17]  Andrew Crisell,et al.  An introductory history of British broadcasting , 1997 .

[18]  M. Poster.  The Second Media Age , 1994 .

[19]  S. Livingstone.  The Challenge of Changing Audiences , 2004 .

[20]  Hugh Mackay,et al.  ANALOGUE SWITCH‐OFF , 2007 .

[21]  John Ellis.  Visible Fictions: Cinema: Television: Video , 1982 .

[22]  G. Kirkpatrick.  Critical Technology: A Social Theory of Personal Computing , 2017 .

[23]  Alan T. Peacock,et al.  Public Service Broadcasting Without the Bbc? , 2004 .

[24]  R. Silverstone,et al.  Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household , 2003 .

[25]  Maria Sourbati,et al.  Digital Television, Online Connectivity and Electronic Service Delivery: Implications for Communications Policy (and Research) , 2004 .

[26]  Helen Wood.  Texting the Subject: Women, Television, and Modern Self-Reflexivity , 2005 .

[27]  Roger Silverstone,et al.  What's New about New Media? , 1999, New Media Soc..

[28]  Graham Murdock,et al.  Communications and the constitution of modernity , 1993 .

[29]  Espen Aarseth.  Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature , 1997 .

[30]  John T. Caldwell,et al.  Televisuality: Style, Crisis, and Authority in American Television , 1995 .

[31]  Marshall McLuhan,et al.  Television: Technology and Cultural Form , 1978 .

[32]  Media, technology and daily life HERMANN BAUSINGER , 1984 .

[33]  Stuart Allan.  Online News: Journalism and the Internet , 2006 .

[34]  Shaun Moores,et al.  Media and Everyday Life in Modern Society , 2019 .