Systemic thinking in support of safety management in nuclear power plants

Abstract Systemic thinking is proposed to be applied within safety management. In the article I discuss benefits and content of systemic thinking in connection to safety. Systemic thinking has to do with creating an understanding of systems in an environment. How can macro behaviour be understood as generated by micro interactions of its parts? The article places a focus on nuclear power in Finland, because it avoids dangers of being too abstract. An application of safety principles during design and operation makes it possible to reach acceptable safety and avoid open ended discussions. A definition of necessary and sufficient requirements for safety condensed into claims and evidence can be collected from systems design and operation. The article starts with an account of concepts from systemic thinking and safety management, to discuss how sociotechnical models can be used. A separation between humans, technology, organisation and information provides a system of systems model of the plant. Using this model one may consider safe and dangerous regions of the plant state space. A proper management of design and operation makes it possible to argue that used practices provide mechanisms for early detection and correction of deficiencies in plant systems. Important components are management systems, decision support, performance evaluation, organisational learning, staff proficiency and stakeholders. In the discussion part of the article remaining challenges in ensuring safety are brought forward. The article concludes that systemic thinking and a simultaneous consideration of entirety and details are important components in ensuring nuclear safety.

[1]  J. Carroll Organizational Learning Activities in High‐hazard Industries: The Logics Underlying Self‐Analysis , 1998 .

[2]  Torgeir K. Haavik,et al.  On Components and Relations in Sociotechnical Systems , 2011 .

[3]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Safety in System-of-Systems: ten key challenges , 2014 .

[4]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  System of Systems Engineering and Risk Management of Extreme Events: Concepts and Case Study , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Azad M. Madni,et al.  System of Systems Integration: Key Considerations and Challenges , 2014, Syst. Eng..

[6]  Jan Hayes,et al.  Taking responsibility for public safety: How engineers seek to minimise disaster incubation in design of hazardous facilities , 2015 .

[7]  Andrew Hale,et al.  MODELLING OF SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[8]  Richard Taylor,et al.  A study of the precursors leading to 'organisational' accidents in complex industrial settings , 2015 .

[9]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Assessment of domino effect: State of the art and research Needs , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  David Borys,et al.  Safety regulation: The lessons of workplace safety rule management for managing the regulatory burden , 2012 .

[11]  Martha Grabowski,et al.  Reliability seeking virtual organizations: Challenges for high reliability organizations and resilience engineering , 2016, Safety Science.

[12]  Stian Antonsen,et al.  Safety culture and the issue of power , 2009 .

[13]  Jean-Christophe Le Coze,et al.  Outlines of a sensitising model for industrial safety assessment , 2013 .

[14]  K. Cameron Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness , 1986 .

[15]  John R Wilson,et al.  Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/human factors. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  Torgeir K. Haavik,et al.  On the ontology of safety , 2014 .

[17]  Giampiero E. G. Beroggi,et al.  Model formulation support in risk management , 1996 .

[18]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Modelling the planning system in design and development , 2019 .

[19]  Anna-Maria Teperi,et al.  Applying a new human factor tool in the nuclear energy industry , 2017 .

[20]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  There is safety in power, or power in safety , 2014 .

[21]  Alfred Roelen,et al.  The contribution of design to accidents , 2007 .

[22]  Sarah L. Peck A human performance programme to improve front-line nuclear operations , 2012, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[23]  Björn Wahlström,et al.  Organisational learning – Reflections from the nuclear industry , 2011 .

[24]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Process models in design and development , 2017, Research in Engineering Design.

[25]  Louis Anthony Cox,et al.  Improving Risk Management: From Lame Excuses to Principled Practice , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  Glen Murphy,et al.  The construction of social identity in newly recruited nuclear engineering staff: A longitudinal study , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[27]  Scott Jackson,et al.  Resilience principles for engineered systems , 2013, Syst. Eng..

[28]  Linda Drupsteen,et al.  Why do organizations not learn from incidents? Bottlenecks, causes and conditions for a failure to effectively learn. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Raghvendra V. Cowlagi,et al.  Coordinability and Consistency in Accident Causation and Prevention: Formal System Theoretic Concepts for Safety in Multilevel Systems , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[30]  David L. Collinson,et al.  Trust Relations in High‐Reliability Organizations , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[31]  Pia Oedewald,et al.  Safety culture and subcontractor network governance in a complex safety critical project , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[32]  I. Edvardsson In Praise of Bureaucracy , 2001 .

[33]  J Leplat,et al.  About implementation of safety rules , 1998 .

[34]  K. Artto,et al.  A new governance approach for multi-firm projects: Lessons from Olkiluoto 3 and Flamanville 3 nuclear power plant projects , 2011 .

[35]  Ron Westrum,et al.  The study of information flow: A personal journey , 2014 .

[36]  E. Lay,et al.  A practitioner's experiences operationalizing Resilience Engineering , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[37]  Bjorn Wahlstrom Reflections on regulatory oversight of nuclear power plants , 2007 .

[38]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Model validation in soft systems practice , 2007 .

[39]  S. Beer The Brain of the Firm , 1972 .

[40]  Björn Wahlström,et al.  Challenges in performing technical safety reviews of modifications – A case study , 2012 .

[41]  Theodore J. Gordon,et al.  Chaos and fractals: New tools for technological and social forecasting , 1988 .

[42]  Björn Wahlström On the use of models in human decision-making , 1988 .

[43]  Martin Kleinmann,et al.  Job requirements for control room jobs in nuclear power plants , 2011 .

[44]  E. Hollnagel,et al.  What-You-Look-For-Is-What-You-Find - The consequences of underlying accident models in eight accident investigation manuals , 2009 .

[45]  Urban Kjellén,et al.  Safety in the design of offshore platforms: Integrated safety versus safety as an add-on characteristic , 2007 .

[46]  Joseph H. Saleh,et al.  System Safety Principles: A Multidisciplinary Engineering Perspective , 2014 .

[47]  Sidney W. A. Dekker,et al.  Cognitive engineering and the moral theology and witchcraft of cause , 2011, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[48]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  What does ‘safe’ look and feel like? , 2014 .

[49]  Sari Tappura,et al.  A management accounting perspective on safety , 2012 .

[50]  Johann Weichbrodt,et al.  Safety rules as instruments for organizational control, coordination and knowledge: Implications for rules management , 2015 .

[51]  M. Mesarovic,et al.  Theory of Hierarchical, Multilevel, Systems , 1970 .

[52]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  Bureaucracy, influence and beliefs: A literature review of the factors shaping the role of a safety professional , 2017 .

[53]  Tak Wing Yiu,et al.  Identifying behaviour patterns of construction safety using system archetypes. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[54]  E. Quarantelli DISASTER CRISIS MANAGEMENT: A SUMMARY OF RESEARCH FINDINGS , 1988 .

[55]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Industrial disasters: Extreme events, extremely rare. Some reflections on the treatment of uncertainties in the assessment of the associated risks , 2013 .

[56]  Jeremy Busby,et al.  How plan delegation contributes to systemic failure , 2003 .

[57]  J. L. Coze,et al.  Vive la diversité! High Reliability Organisation (HRO) and Resilience Engineering (RE) , 2016, Safety Science.

[58]  Tom Kontogiannis,et al.  Proactive assessment of breaches of safety constraints and causal organizational breakdowns in complex systems: A joint STAMP-VSM framework for safety assessment , 2014 .

[59]  Jaime Santos-Reyes,et al.  A systemic approach to managing safety , 2008 .

[60]  Bernard Papin,et al.  Balancing human and technical reliability in the design of advanced nuclear reactors , 2011 .

[61]  Margaret Thomson Crichton From cockpit to operating theatre to drilling rig floor: five principles for improving safety using simulator-based exercises to enhance team cognition , 2016, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[62]  Benoit Morel,et al.  Through the Looking Glass of Complexity: the Dynamics of Organizations As Adaptive and Evolving Systems , 1999 .

[63]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence , 2001 .

[64]  Mirela Nitoi,et al.  The organizational factor in PSA framework , 2015 .

[65]  Jan Hayes,et al.  Investigating design office dynamics that support safe design , 2015 .

[66]  Kirsi Virrantaus,et al.  Shared situational awareness and information quality in disaster management , 2015 .

[67]  Franca Giannini,et al.  Exploiting process plant digital representation for risk analysis , 2007 .

[68]  W. Ashby,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957 .

[69]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[70]  Karen B. Marais,et al.  Designing Resilient Systems‐of‐Systems: A Survey of Metrics, Methods, and Challenges , 2015, Syst. Eng..

[71]  N. Pidgeon The Limits to Safety? Culture, Politics, Learning and Man–Made Disasters , 1997 .

[72]  Terje Aven,et al.  The risk concept - historical and recent development trends , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[73]  Petter Grytten Almklov,et al.  When safety science meets the practitioners: Does safety science contribute to marginalization of practical knowledge? , 2014 .

[74]  David D. Woods,et al.  Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[75]  A. Hopkins,et al.  Do incentives work? A qualitative study of managers' motivations in hazardous industries , 2014 .

[76]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Are safety and operational effectiveness contradictory requirements: : The roles of routines and relational coordination , 2015 .

[77]  Dietrich Manzey,et al.  Digging deeper! Insights from a multi-method assessment of safety culture in nuclear power plants based on Schein’s culture model , 2017 .

[78]  Petter Grytten Almklov,et al.  Regulating the intangible. Searching for safety culture in the Norwegian petroleum industry , 2017 .

[79]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  ‘Just culture:’ Improving safety by achieving substantive, procedural and restorative justice , 2016 .

[80]  Björn Wahlström,et al.  Safety management – A multi-level control problem ☆ , 2014 .

[81]  G. Moon,et al.  Developing an Organisational Integrity framework for nuclear safety , 2012, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[82]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[83]  Hans J. Pasman,et al.  Accidents in “normal” operation – Can you see them coming? , 2010 .

[84]  Inés Tomás,et al.  Leadership and employees' perceived safety behaviours in a nuclear power plant: A structural equation model , 2011 .

[85]  A. Hopkins Issues in safety science , 2014 .

[86]  Andrew Hale,et al.  Working to rule or working safely? Part 2: The management of safety rules and procedures , 2013 .

[87]  Jon Espen Skogdalen,et al.  Quantitative risk analysis offshore - Human and organizational factors , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[88]  Jules Arntz-Gray,et al.  Plan, Do, Check, Act: The need for independent audit of the internal responsibility system in occupational health and safety , 2016 .

[89]  Jaime Santos-Reyes,et al.  A SSMS model with application to the oil and gas industry , 2009 .

[90]  C. Starr Social benefit versus technological risk. , 1969, Science.

[91]  Jean Luc Wybo,et al.  COMMAND CENTERS AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SUPPORT , 1998 .

[92]  Jonas Lundberg,et al.  Systemic resilience model , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[93]  Jay W. Forrester,et al.  Policies, decisions and information sources for modeling☆ , 1992 .

[94]  Sidney W. A. Dekker,et al.  MABA-MABA or Abracadabra? Progress on Human–Automation Co-ordination , 2002, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[95]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[96]  Stephen Swailes,et al.  Organizational Change , 1997 .

[97]  J. L. Coze What have we learned about learning from accidents? Post-disasters reflections , 2013 .

[98]  Tom Kontogiannis,et al.  Adapting plans in progress in distributed supervisory work: aspects of complexity, coupling, and control , 2010, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[99]  F R Chevreau,et al.  Organizing learning processes on risks by using the bow-tie representation. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[100]  H. J. Pasman,et al.  A holistic approach to control process safety risks: Possible ways forward , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[101]  Takafumi Nakamura,et al.  System of system failures: Meta methodology for IT engineering safety , 2009 .

[102]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Portfolio optimization of safety measures for reducing risks in nuclear systems , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[103]  Andrew Hale,et al.  Safety science, a founding fathers’ retrospection , 2017 .

[104]  T. Laporte,et al.  Working in Practice But Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of “High-Reliability Organizations” , 1991 .

[105]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  On the importance of behavioral operational research: The case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[106]  Dennis Duchon,et al.  A qualitative study of high‐reputation plant managers: Political skill and successful outcomes , 2009 .

[107]  J. Elster Explaining Technical Change , 1983 .

[108]  Kathryn Woodcock Model of safety inspection , 2014 .

[109]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[110]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Perspectives on iteration in design and development , 2017 .

[111]  Oded Maimon,et al.  The design process: properties, paradigms, and structure , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[112]  J. Robert Taylor,et al.  Statistics of design error in the process industries , 2007 .

[113]  Carl Rollenhagen,et al.  Experience feedback from in-depth event investigations: How to find and implement efficient remedial actions , 2017 .

[114]  R. Flin,et al.  Safety intelligence: an exploration of senior managers' characteristics. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[115]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[116]  Simone Colombo,et al.  The Plant Simulator as viable means to prevent and manage risk through competencies management: Experiment results , 2016 .

[117]  Teemu Reiman,et al.  Human and organizational biases affecting the management of safety , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[118]  Tom Kontogiannis,et al.  Recursive modeling of loss of control in human and organizational processes: a systemic model for accident analysis. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[119]  A. Hale,et al.  Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review , 2013 .

[120]  Jean-Luc Wybo,et al.  Assessing propensity to learn from safety-related events , 2015 .

[121]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Coping with complexity: past, present and future , 2011, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[122]  Sue R. Faerman,et al.  Embracing Paradox in Management: The Value of the Competing Values Framework , 2014 .

[123]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A systems approach to risk management through leading safety indicators , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[124]  P. May Regulatory regimes and accountability , 2007 .

[125]  Joost C. F. de Winter,et al.  Why the Fitts list has persisted throughout the history of function allocation , 2011, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[126]  Russell Lock,et al.  Developing a methodology to support the evolution of System of Systems using risk analysis , 2012, Syst. Eng..

[127]  Sue Cox,et al.  Behavioural Safety and Accident Prevention: Short-Term ‘Fad’ or Sustainable ‘Fix’? , 2006 .

[128]  Efstathios Bakolas,et al.  Augmenting defense-in-depth with the concepts of observability and diagnosability from Control Theory and Discrete Event Systems , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[129]  Irene Eusgeld,et al.  "System-of-systems" approach for interdependent critical infrastructures , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[130]  Ludwig von Bertalanffy,et al.  General System Theory , 1969 .

[131]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[132]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[133]  R. Flood,et al.  Knowing of the Unknowable , 1999 .

[134]  Tor-Olav Nævestad,et al.  Safety Cultural Preconditions for Organizational Learning in High-Risk Organizations , 2008 .

[135]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  Process safety indicators, a review of literature , 2016 .

[136]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[137]  Linda Drupsteen,et al.  What is Learning? A Review of the Safety Literature to Define Learning from Incidents, Accidents and Disasters , 2014 .

[138]  S. Dekker The bureaucratization of safety , 2014 .

[139]  Karlos Artto,et al.  Dimensions of distance in a project network: Exploring Olkiluoto 3 nuclear power plant project , 2009 .

[140]  John Bond Professional ethics and corporate social responsibility , 2009 .

[141]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[142]  Kristine Vedal Størkersen Survival versus safety at sea. Regulators’ portrayal of paralysis in safety regulation development , 2015 .

[143]  Andrew Hopkins,et al.  Counteracting the Cultural Causes of Disaster , 1999 .

[144]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Promoting safety by increasing uncertainty – Implications for risk management , 2015 .

[145]  Yacov Y Haimes Systems-based guiding principles for risk modeling, planning, assessment, management, and communication. , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[146]  João Pedro Hespanha,et al.  Linear Systems Theory , 2009 .

[147]  Jean-Luc Wybo,et al.  Preparing Graduate Students to be HSE Professionals , 2016 .

[148]  L. A. Cox Evaluating and improving risk formulas for allocating limited budgets to expensive risk-reduction opportunities. , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[149]  Boris Eisenbart,et al.  Taking a look at the utilisation of function models in interdisciplinary design: insights from ten engineering companies , 2017 .

[150]  Karin Laumann,et al.  Interorganizational complexity and organizational accident risk: A literature review , 2016 .

[151]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Software Engineering Economics , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.