Gender differences in website production and preference aesthetics: preliminary implications for ICT in education and beyond

The purpose of this study was to examine the implications of a gendered website production and preference aesthetic for the teaching of computer studies. Thirty male and thirty female personal websites produced by students at a UK university were rated against 23 factors. The home pages of sites that were deemed to be typical of their gender were then used in preference tests conducted amongst 67 students. Statistically significant differences emerged on 13 of the 23 factors against which the 60 websites were rated. These results were suggestive of a website aesthetic continuum with male and female production aesthetic tendencies at either end. The preference tests revealed a tendency for preferences to be in tune with production aesthetics such that men had a statistically significant tendency to prefer home pages produced by men, and women to prefer home pages produced by women. The tendency for the latter was even higher than the male tendency to prefer male-produced sites. The finding of gendered differences in website production and preference aesthetics has important implications for teaching and assessment. Teachers selecting or assessing websites, whether commercial or produced by pupils and students, need be mindful of the aesthetics employed in those websites. When selecting websites for educational purposes, a match should ideally be made between the website and the likely preferences of the end-user. Assessment of students' work should ideally be mindful of the potential for positive bias on the part of the assessor in the direction of work displaying their own favoured aesthetic.

[1]  P. Trudgill,et al.  Gender and discourse , 1998 .

[2]  Anne-Marie Greene,et al.  The Dynamics of Managing Diversity , 2000 .

[3]  Gurpreet Dhillon,et al.  Interpreting Dimensions of Consumer Trust in E-Commerce , 2003, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[4]  Clare Bradley,et al.  Sex bias in the evaluation of students , 1984 .

[5]  Paul Greenhalgh,et al.  The Empathy Principle: Towards a model for the Psychology of Art , 1992 .

[6]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The perceived credibility of personal Web page information as influenced by the sex of the source , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Shelly Rodgers,et al.  Gender and e-commerce: an exploratory study , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[8]  G. Moss,et al.  Websites and services branding: implications of Universities' websites for internal and external communication , 2005 .

[9]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  An Examination of Gender Effects on the Career Success of Information Systems Employees , 1993 .

[10]  Genel sosyal bilimler Women on Web , 2010 .

[11]  Melanie Wilson,et al.  A conceptual framework for studying gender in information systems research , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[12]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites , 2004 .

[13]  I. Kant,et al.  The Critique of Judgement , 2020 .

[14]  Gloria Moss,et al.  Assessment: Do Males and Females make Judgements in a Self-selecting Fashion? , 1996 .

[15]  J Brewis,et al.  Understanding gender and organizations , 1998 .

[16]  E. C. Ritchie,et al.  Gender Differences , 1981, Language in Society.

[17]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  Gender and website design in e-business , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Bus..

[18]  J. Heller,et al.  Some men like it black, some women like it pink: consumer implications of differences in male and female website design , 2006 .

[19]  Mara Westling Allodi Equal Opportunities in Educational Systems: the case of Sweden , 2007 .

[20]  Bruce Bimber Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet 1 , 2000 .

[21]  J. Cooper,et al.  Sex Bias in Educational Software: The Effect of Designers' Stereotypes on the Software They Design1 , 1987 .

[22]  H. Ono,et al.  Gender and the Internet , 2003 .

[23]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Status Report on Women and Men in the IT Workplace , 1997, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[24]  Deborah Tannen Talking from 9 to 5: Women and Men at Work: Language, Sex and Power , 1994 .

[25]  France Bélanger,et al.  Gender differences in perceptions of web-based shopping , 2002, CACM.

[26]  Gloria Moss,et al.  Implications of an Interactive Aesthetic for French and UK e-commerce , 2006 .

[27]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[28]  S. Nkomo The Emperor Has No Clothes: Rewriting “Race in Organizations” , 1992 .

[29]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Anne Elliott Screenplay: Children and Computing in the Home , 2005, Education and Information Technologies.

[31]  J. Porteous Environmental Aesthetics: Ideas, Politics and Planning , 1996 .

[32]  Gloria Moss,et al.  Differences in the design aesthetic of men and women: Implications for product branding , 1995 .

[33]  S. J. Simon,et al.  Attitudes Towards Product Website Design: A Study of the Effects of Gender , 2005 .

[34]  Doug Miller,et al.  Equality management - Towards a materialist approach , 1996 .

[35]  Rita Marcella,et al.  Women on the Web: A critical appraisal of a sample reflecting the range and content of women's sites on the Internet, with particular reference to the support of women's interaction and participation , 2002, J. Documentation.

[36]  Ellen Garbarino,et al.  GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE PERCEIVED RISK OF BUYING ONLINE AND THE EFFECTS OF RECEIVING A SITE RECOMMENDATION , 2004 .

[37]  Nelarine Cornelius,et al.  Re‐examining workplace equality: the capabilities approach , 2000 .

[38]  Bruce Bimber Bimber Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet , 2003 .

[39]  Roberta F. Hammett Computers in Schools: White Boys Only?. , 1997 .

[40]  Mary Cianni,et al.  Life in the Corporation: A Multi-Method Study of the Experiences of Male and Female Asian, Black, Hispanic and White Employees , 1997 .

[41]  Bo N. Schenkman,et al.  Aesthetics and preferences of web pages , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[42]  Steven John Simon,et al.  The impact of culture and gender on web sites: an empirical study , 2000, DATB.

[43]  D. Roote,et al.  Status Report , 2006, Journal of periodontology.