Comparing Performance of Biomass Gasifier Stoves: Influence of a Multi-Context Approach

Millions of people worldwide die prematurely or suffer from severe health ailments due to cooking equipment that causes unhealthy doses of (household) air pollution. Many attempts to address this have fallen short because technology was not improved sufficiently or the way it was introduced constituted an ill fit with the broader “cooking eco-system”. In terms of technology, (biomass) gasifier stoves look promising on all three sustainability dimensions (people, planet, profit) but have not been adopted on a substantial scale across cultures and regions either. We therefore used a design approach that takes multiple contexts (target groups) into account and compared the performance of a gasifier stove that was developed following this multi-context approach with four previous gasifier versions. With the comparative assessment using criteria well beyond mere technological performance we found that it performed better than these versions as well as than what could be expected based on historical learning, while providing additional systemic advantages. These results encourage verification of the value of the multi-context approach in more settings while providing clues for refinement of the assessment method.

[1]  I. Luginaah,et al.  Effectiveness of interventions to reduce household air pollution and/or improve health in homes using solid fuel in low-and-middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Environment international.

[2]  Tania Urmee,et al.  A review of improved Cookstove technologies and programs , 2014 .

[3]  S. Abdelnour The Cookstove–Rape Prevention Myth and the Limits of Techno-saviorism , 2015 .

[4]  A. Atteridge,et al.  Transforming Household Energy Practices among Charcoal Users in Lusaka, Zambia: A User-Centred Approach , 2013 .

[5]  Jörg Peters,et al.  The intensive margin of technology adoption--Experimental evidence on improved cooking stoves in rural Senegal. , 2015, Journal of health economics.

[6]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Systematic Design Methods and the Creative Performance of New Product Teams: Do They Contradict or Complement Each Other? , 2007 .

[7]  M.R.M. Crul,et al.  A multi-context design approach for a portable ultrasound device , 2016 .

[8]  Erik O. Ahlgren,et al.  Energy Efficiency at the Base of the Pyramid: A System-Based Market Model for Improved Cooking Stove Adoption , 2014 .

[9]  Helen H. Lou,et al.  Development and performance evaluation of a clean-burning stove , 2016 .

[10]  Vilas R. Kalamkar,et al.  A comprehensive review on biomass cookstoves and a systematic approach for modern cookstove design , 2014 .

[11]  David L. Levy CHAOS THEORY AND STRATEGY: THEORY, APPLICATION, AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS , 2007 .

[12]  Iva Peša Sawdust pellets, micro gasifying cook stoves and charcoal in urban Zambia: Understanding the value chain dynamics of improved cook stove initiatives , 2017 .

[13]  Norman Crolee Dalkey,et al.  An experimental study of group opinion , 1969 .

[14]  Olof Nilsson A USER CENTRED APPROACH , 2006 .

[15]  Christopher A. Mattson,et al.  A global review of end user needs: Establishing the need for adaptable cookstoves , 2014, IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC 2014).

[16]  T. Sunderland,et al.  Dynamics of the charcoal and indigenous timber trade in Zambia: A scoping study in Eastern, Northern and Northwestern provinces , 2013 .

[17]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  DesignX: Complex Sociotechnical Systems , 2016 .

[18]  Ying Liu,et al.  Experimental Study of Thermal Performance Comparison Based on the Traditional and Multifunctional Biomass Stoves in China , 2015 .

[19]  Matthew Kutz,et al.  What Is Contextual Intelligence , 2017 .

[20]  J. Diehl,et al.  Context variation by design , 2015 .

[21]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Learning to live with complexity. , 2011, Harvard business review.

[22]  Gary J. Wingenbach,et al.  Rethinking improved cookstove diffusion programs: A case study of social perceptions and cooking choices in rural Guatemala , 2014 .

[23]  C. H. Dorst,et al.  Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design , 2015 .

[24]  Emanuela Colombo,et al.  Sustainable energy in Africa: A comprehensive data and policies review , 2014 .

[25]  Emanuela Colombo,et al.  Laboratory protocols for testing of Improved Cooking Stoves (ICSs): A review of state-of-the-art and further developments , 2017 .

[26]  E. Ahlgren,et al.  Policy implications for improved cook stove programs—A case study of the importance of village fuel use variations , 2014 .

[27]  S. Tao,et al.  Efficiencies and pollutant emissions from forced-draft biomass-pellet semi-gasifier stoves: Comparison of International and Chinese water boiling test protocols , 2016 .

[28]  R. Richardson,et al.  Charcoal, livelihoods, and poverty reduction: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa , 2013 .

[29]  J. Bert Keats,et al.  Quality Planning and Analysis , 1981 .

[30]  M.R.M. Crul,et al.  Influence of Context Variation on Quality of Solutions: Experiences with Gasifier Stoves , 2017 .

[31]  I. Oosterlaken,et al.  Design for Development: A Capability Approach , 2009, Design Issues.

[32]  M. Vaccari,et al.  Socio-Economic Survey as a Support Tool during the Scaling Up of Improved Stoves in the Logone Valley (Chad/Cameroon) , 2014 .

[33]  R. Stacey Complexity and Creativity in Organizations , 1996 .

[34]  Jaswinder Singh,et al.  Management of the agricultural biomass on decentralized basis for producing sustainable power in India , 2017 .

[35]  R. Kaplinsky Schumacher meets Schumpeter: Appropriate technology below the radar , 2011 .

[36]  Gireesh Shrimali,et al.  'Oorja' in India: Assessing a large-scale commercial distribution of advanced biomass stoves to households. , 2014, Energy for sustainable development : the journal of the International Energy Initiative.

[37]  Boris Groysberg,et al.  Manage Your Work, Manage Your Life , 2014 .

[38]  N. Dalkey,et al.  An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts , 1963 .

[39]  Hassan Mtoro Rajabu,et al.  Multiple biomass fuels and improved cook stoves from Tanzania assessed with the Water Boiling Test , 2016 .

[40]  A. Mink,et al.  Design for Well-Being : An Approach for Understanding Users' Lives in Design for Development , 2016 .

[41]  Cecilia Sundberg,et al.  Gasifier as a cleaner cooking system in rural Kenya , 2016 .

[42]  S. Tao,et al.  Inhalation exposure and risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) among the rural population adopting wood gasifier stoves compared to different fuel-stove users , 2016 .

[43]  P. Thai,et al.  A review of biomass burning: Emissions and impacts on air quality, health and climate in China. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[44]  Yiyang Fan,et al.  Rethinking Global Innovation Strategy: Emerging Market Perspectives , 2013 .