Functionally referential alarm calls in noisy miners communicate about predator behaviour

Many vertebrates have alarm calls that warn conspecifics about danger, and some species even communicate about the type of predator or its behaviour, allowing for appropriate responses. However, such ‘functionally referential’ communication has been shown experimentally in only a handful of species, and requires demonstrating that individuals give acoustically distinct calls to different threats, and that the calls alone are sufficient to prompt listeners to behave as if a specific threat is present. We carried out model presentations, acoustic analyses and a playback experiment to test whether the alarm calls of noisy miners, Manorina melanocephala , are functionally referential. Miners gave different calls to airborne raptor models compared to terrestrial or perched raptor models, and even switched from ‘aerial’ alarm calls to ‘chur’ alarm calls when a hawk glider landed on the ground. They also behaved differently to these two types of threats, showing avoidance to aerial threats, including fleeing or freezing, but deterrent behaviour to terrestrial threats, including vigilance, approach and mobbing. The two alarm call types were acoustically distinct, and consistent with calls to live predators. Blind scoring of video revealed that birds responded appropriately to playbacks of alarm calls alone, typically fleeing to aerial alarm calls yet becoming vigilant, approaching and calling to chur calls. Noisy miners produce alarm calls that therefore meet both criteria for functional reference, and thus become one of the few bird species in which such calls have been confirmed. Many birds appear to give different calls to airborne predators compared to during mobbing of terrestrial or stationary predators, so functionally referential alarms are likely to be common and may often categorize predators by their behaviour and not simply their taxonomic type.

[1]  Andrea M.-K. Bierema,et al.  On the Meaning of Alarm Calls: A Review of Functional Reference in Avian Alarm Calling , 2013 .

[2]  D. Dow AGONISTIC AND SPACING BEHAVIOUR OF THE NOISY MINER MANORINA MELANOCEPHALA, A COMMUNALLY BREEDING HONEYEATER , 2008 .

[3]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  D. Dow Displays of the honeyeater Manorina melanocephala. , 2010, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[5]  K. Zuberbühler Referential labelling in Diana monkeys , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Vervets revisited: A quantitative analysis of alarm call structure and context specificity , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[7]  D. Dow,et al.  Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Noisy Miners: variations on the theme of communality , 1990 .

[8]  Charlotte E. Taylor,et al.  Does the presence of grevilleas and eucalypts in urban gardens influence the distribution and foraging ecology of Noisy Miners? , 2009 .

[9]  G. Klump,et al.  Acoustic Behaviour of Birds and Mammals in the Predator Context; I. Factors Affecting the Structure of Alarm Signals. II. The Functional Significance and Evolution of Alarm Signals , 2010 .

[10]  Christopher S. Evans,et al.  Individual distinctiveness in the mobbing call of a cooperative bird, the noisy miner Manorina melanocephala , 2009 .

[11]  C. Mary,et al.  Heterospecific information about predation risk influences exploratory behavior , 2012 .

[12]  Toshitaka N Suzuki,et al.  Experimental evidence for compositional syntax in bird calls , 2016, Nature Communications.

[13]  A. Agresti An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .

[14]  K. Sanderson,et al.  Perception of terrestrial and aerial alarm calls by honeyeaters and falcons , 2000 .

[15]  Robert D Magrath,et al.  A micro-geography of fear: learning to eavesdrop on alarm calls of neighbouring heterospecifics , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  C. N. Slobodchikoff,et al.  Perceptual specificity in the alarm calls of Gunnison's prairie dogs , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[17]  C. Catterall,et al.  A particular case and a general pattern: hyperaggressive behaviour by one species may mediate avifaunal decreases in fragmented Australian forests , 2003 .

[18]  P. J. Higgins,et al.  Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds. Volume 5: trant-Flycatchers to chats , 2001 .

[19]  M. Maron Threshold effect of eucalypt density on an aggressive avian competitor , 2007 .

[20]  L. Barrett,et al.  Responses of vervet monkeys in large troops to terrestrial and aerial predator alarm calls , 2014 .

[21]  Robert D. Magrath,et al.  Wild Birds Learn to Eavesdrop on Heterospecific Alarm Calls , 2015, Current Biology.

[22]  Michael Griesser,et al.  Referential Calls Signal Predator Behavior in a Group-Living Bird Species , 2008, Current Biology.

[23]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Mating system of the cooperatively breeding noisy miner Manorina melanocephala, as revealed by DNA profiling , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  P. Marler,et al.  Vervet monkey alarm calls: Semantic communication in a free-ranging primate , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Toshitaka N. Suzuki Semantic communication in birds: evidence from field research over the past two decades , 2016, Ecological Research.

[26]  Christopher S. Evans,et al.  Essay on Contemporary Issues in Ethology: Variation among Mammalian Alarm Call Systems and the Problem of Meaning in Animal Signals , 2010 .

[27]  L. A. Grieves,et al.  Joint-nesting smooth-billed anis, Crotophaga ani, use a functionally referential alarm call system , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using Ibm Spss Statistics , 2017 .

[29]  Erick Greene,et al.  Allometry of Alarm Calls: Black-Capped Chickadees Encode Information About Predator Size , 2005, Science.

[30]  Andrew Meade,et al.  Detecting Regular Sound Changes in Linguistics as Events of Concerted Evolution , 2015, Current Biology.

[31]  K. Zuberbühler Chapter 8 Survivor Signals , 2009 .

[32]  A. Radford,et al.  Eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: from mechanisms to consequences , 2015, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[33]  W. Davis,et al.  HANDBOOK OF AUSTRALIAN, NEW ZEALAND, AND ANTARCTIC BIRDS, VOLUME 4: PARROTS TO DOLLARBIRD , 2001 .

[34]  P. Marler,et al.  Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. , 1980, Science.

[35]  Alan Lill,et al.  How Noisy Does a Noisy Miner Have to Be? Amplitude Adjustments of Alarm Calls in an Avian Urban ‘Adapter’ , 2012, PloS one.

[36]  Robert M. Seyfarth,et al.  Suricate alarm calls signal predator class and urgency , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  K. Sanderson,et al.  Alarm Vocalisations in Australian Birds: Convergent Characteristics and Phylogenetic Differences , 1994 .

[38]  Michael L. Avery,et al.  The versatility of graded acoustic measures in classification of predation threats by the tufted titmouse Baeolophus bicolor: exploring a mixed framework for threat communication , 2010 .

[39]  Brandon C. Wheeler,et al.  The blurred boundaries of functional reference: a response to Scarantino & Clay , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  C. Catterall,et al.  BUSHLAND MODIFICATION AND STYLES OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT : THEIR EFFECTS ON BIRDS IN SOUTH-EAST QUEENSLAND , 1998 .

[41]  M. Manser,et al.  The acoustic structure of suricates' alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Klaus Zuberbühler,et al.  Conceptual Semantics in a Nonhuman Primate , 1999 .

[43]  Robert D. Magrath,et al.  Eavesdropping on other species: mutual interspecific understanding of urgency information in avian alarm calls , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  D. Dow Indiscriminate Interspecific Aggression Leading to Almost Sole Occupancy of Space by a Single Species of Bird , 1977 .

[45]  T. Caro,et al.  Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals , 2006 .

[46]  U. Stegmann Animal Communication Theory: Information and Influence , 2018 .

[47]  Robert D Magrath,et al.  Recognition of other species' aerial alarm calls: speaking the same language or learning another? , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  Kurt Hammerschmidt,et al.  Functionally Referential Alarm Calls in Tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis and Saguinus mystax) – Evidence from Playback Experiments , 2006 .

[49]  Klaus Zuberbühler,et al.  The central importance of information in studies of animal communication , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  M. Manser,et al.  The information that receivers extract from alarm calls in suricates , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  Robert D. Magrath,et al.  Communicating about danger: urgency alarm calling in a bird , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[52]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[53]  Simon W. Townsend,et al.  Functionally Referential Communication in Mammals: The Past, Present and the Future , 2013 .

[54]  M. Considine,et al.  Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds. Volume 2: raptors to lapwings , 2007 .

[55]  M. Ryan,et al.  What do animal signals mean? , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[56]  P. Kappeler,et al.  Anti-predator behavior of group-living Malagasy primates: mixed evidence for a referential alarm call system , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[57]  Benjamin J. Pitcher,et al.  A mutual understanding? Interspecific responses by birds to each other's aerial alarm calls , 2007 .