News consumption and social media regulations policy

Users online tend to consume information adhering to their system of beliefs and to ignore dissenting information. During the COVID-19 pandemic, users get exposed to a massive amount of information about a new topic having a high level of uncertainty. In this paper, we analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation concerning COVID-19. We compare the two platforms on about three million pieces of content analyzing user interaction with respect to news articles. We first describe users’ consumption patterns on the two platforms focusing on the political leaning of news outlets. Finally, we characterize the echo chamber effect by modeling the dynamics of users’ interaction networks. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content, with a consequent affiliation towards reliable sources in terms of engagement and comments. Conversely, the lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior. Twitter users show segregation towards reliable content with a uniform narrative. Gab, instead, offers a more heterogeneous structure where users, independently of their leaning, follow people who are slightly polarized towards questionable news.

[1]  Michela Del Vicario,et al.  News Consumption during the Italian Referendum: A Cross-Platform Analysis on Facebook and Twitter , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA).

[2]  R. Kelly Garrett,et al.  Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou,et al.  Addressing Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media. , 2018, JAMA.

[4]  J. Cappella,et al.  Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment , 2008 .

[5]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The science of fake news , 2018, Science.

[6]  Fabrício Benevenuto,et al.  Inside the Right-Leaning Echo Chambers: Characterizing Gab, an Unmoderated Social System , 2018, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[7]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Science vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  Aristides Gionis,et al.  The effect of collective attention on controversial debates on social media , 2017 .

[10]  Matteo Cinelli,et al.  (Mis)Information Operations: An Integrated Perspective , 2019, ArXiv.

[11]  C. Sunstein,et al.  How people decide what they want to know , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.

[12]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Tracking Social Media Discourse About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development of a Public Coronavirus Twitter Data Set , 2020, JMIR public health and surveillance.

[13]  Mauro Conti,et al.  It's always April fools' day!: On the difficulty of social network misinformation classification via propagation features , 2017, 2017 IEEE Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS).

[14]  L Rampal,et al.  Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. , 2020, The Medical journal of Malaysia.

[15]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Social media polarization and echo chambers: A case study of COVID-19 , 2021, ArXiv.

[16]  Natasha Markuzon,et al.  Incorporating media data into a model of infectious disease transmission , 2019, PloS one.

[17]  Antonio Scala,et al.  Polarization and Fake News , 2018, ACM Trans. Web.

[18]  A. L. Schmidt,et al.  The COVID-19 social media infodemic , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Cécile Viboud,et al.  The future of influenza forecasts , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  A. Siegel.  Online Hate Speech , 2020, Social Media and Democracy.

[21]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[22]  J. M. Berger,et al.  The ISIS Twitter census: defining and describing the population of ISIS supporters on Twitter , 2015 .

[23]  Matteo Cinelli,et al.  Selective exposure shapes the Facebook news diet , 2019, PloS one.

[24]  Hernán A. Makse,et al.  CUNY Academic Works , 2022 .

[25]  J. Zarocostas.  How to fight an infodemic , 2020, The Lancet.

[26]  Sinan Aral,et al.  The spread of true and false news online , 2018, Science.

[27]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook , 2015, Science.

[28]  Neil F. Johnson,et al.  Quantifying COVID-19 Content in the Online Health Opinion War Using Machine Learning , 2020, IEEE Access.

[29]  W. Nuland,et al.  Information operations and Facebook , 2017 .

[30]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Debunking in a world of tribes , 2015, PloS one.

[31]  Fayez Gebali,et al.  Detecting Misleading Information on COVID-19 , 2020, IEEE Access.

[32]  A. Wald.  Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large , 1943 .

[33]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[34]  Aristides Gionis,et al.  Political Discourse on Social Media: Echo Chambers, Gatekeepers, and the Price of Bipartisanship , 2018, WWW.

[35]  G. Caldarelli,et al.  The spreading of misinformation online , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Matteo Cinelli,et al.  The echo chamber effect on social media , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  J. Peto,et al.  Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test Procedures , 1972 .

[38]  Romualdo Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Quantifying echo chamber effects in information spreading over political communication networks , 2019, EPJ Data Science.

[39]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Trend of Narratives in the Age of Misinformation , 2015, PloS one.