Group-centric networking: addressing information sharing requirements at the tactical edge

In recent years, there has been a large push in the U.S. Department of Defense to move to an all-IP infrastructure, particularly on the tactical edge. IP and associated protocols were designed primarily for wired networks tied to fixed infrastructure. Although extensions to support MANET have received decades of research, in practice, there are few successful implementations. Challenges include handling mobility, managing lossy links, and scaling to large numbers of users. Unfortunately, these are the exact conditions military tactical edge networks must operate within: high mobility, high loss, and large numbers of users. To address the needs and particular challenges of military tactical edge information sharing requirements, we consider a new class of networking approaches called group-centric networks that focuses on dynamic and resilient formation of interest groups. The structure of tactical networks limits the majority of collaboration and network traffic to within a group of users that share a set of common interests (i.e., platoons, 4-ships, etc.). These groups are formed either prior to the mission or on the fly with only a minor amount of traffic flowing outside of these groups. Group-centric networking approaches can help connect users in military tactical edge networks. In addition, we also discuss an instantiation of a group-centric network protocol called Group Centric Networking (GCN), compare GCN against a traditional MANET routing approach on a 90-node Android mobile phone testbed, and discuss implications for tactical edge users.

[1]  Marco Conti,et al.  Opportunistic networking: data forwarding in disconnected mobile ad hoc networks , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Juliusz Chroboczek,et al.  The Babel Routing Protocol , 2021, RFC.

[3]  Philippe Jacquet,et al.  Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) , 2003, RFC.

[4]  Bengt Ahlgren,et al.  A survey of information-centric networking , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  James Wheeler,et al.  Evaluation of a Multihop Airborne IP Backbone with Heterogeneous Radio Technologies , 2014, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput..

[6]  R. Allan,et al.  Scalability of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: Theory vs practice , 2010, 2010 - MILCOM 2010 MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE.

[7]  Frank T. Johnsen,et al.  Information-centric networking in the tactical domain , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Rajesh Krishnan,et al.  Content-Oriented Mobile Edge Technology System Integration Framework and Field Evaluation , 2014, 2014 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[9]  James Wheeler,et al.  Internet protocol header compression technology and its applicability on the tactical edge , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  Bow-Nan Cheng,et al.  Design considerations for next-generation airborne tactical networks , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[12]  Jun Sun,et al.  Group Centric Networking: A New Approach for Wireless Multi-Hop Networking to Enable the Internet of Things , 2015, Ad Hoc Networks.

[13]  Joseph P. Macker,et al.  Simplified Multicast Forwarding , 2012, RFC.