Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change

Water management is facing major challenges due to increasing uncertainties caused by climate and global change and by fast changing socio-economic boundary conditions. More attention has to be devoted to understanding and managing the transition from current management regimes to more adaptive regimes that take into account environmental, technological, economic, institutional and cultural characteristics of river basins. This implies a paradigm shift in water management from a prediction and control to a management as learning approach. The change towards adaptive management could be defined as “learning to manage by managing to learn”. Such change aims at increasing the adaptive capacity of river basins at different scales. The paper identifies major challenges for research and practice how to understand a transition in water management regimes. A conceptual framework is introduced how to characterize water management regimes and the dynamics of transition processes. The European project NeWater project is presented as one approach where new scientific methods and practical tools are developed for the participatory assessment and implementation of adaptive water management.

[1]  Alan W. Hodges,et al.  SOUTH FLORIDA: THE REALITY OF CHANGE AND THE PROSPECTS FOR SUSTAINABILITY: Adaptive learning for science-based policy: the Everglades restoration , 2001 .

[2]  Kai N. Lee Appraising Adaptive Management , 2000 .

[3]  C. Folke,et al.  Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change: Fikret Berkes, Johan Colding and Carl Folke (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2003. xxi + 393 pages. ISBN 0-521-81592-4 (hardback), £65 , 2004 .

[4]  S. Levin Ecosystems and the Biosphere as Complex Adaptive Systems , 1998, Ecosystems.

[5]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Humans transforming the global water system , 2004 .

[6]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  The ecology of computation , 1988, Digest of Papers. COMPCON Spring 89. Thirty-Fourth IEEE Computer Society International Conference: Intellectual Leverage.

[7]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[8]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The Implications of Complexity for Integrated Resources Management , 2004 .

[9]  Orazio Giustolisi Report on Hydroinformatics 2004, Singapore , 2005 .

[10]  Dennis P. Lettenmaier,et al.  The Global Water System Project: Science Framework and Implementation Activities , 2005 .

[11]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Towards sustainability in the water sector – The importance of human actors and processes of social learning , 2002, Aquatic Sciences.

[12]  Tharsi Taillieu,et al.  Multi‐party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management , 2004 .

[13]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[14]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/casp.774 Processes of Social Learning in Integrated Resources Management , 2022 .

[15]  J. Norberg,et al.  ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[16]  P. Gleick Global Freshwater Resources: Soft-Path Solutions for the 21st Century , 2003, Science.

[17]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Ecosystems: Chaos and Order Entwined , 1995 .

[18]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The Importance of Social Learning in Restoring the Multifunctionality of Rivers and Floodplains , 2006 .

[19]  C. S. Holling Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management , 2005 .

[20]  P. Senge THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[21]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations , 2002, Ambio.

[22]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology: a 30-year retrospective , 1999 .

[23]  Dave Huitema,et al.  Governance, institutions and participation. A comparative assessment of current conditions in selected , 2005 .

[24]  L. Gunderson Resilience, Flexibility and Adaptive Management - - Antidotes for Spurious Certitude? , 1999 .

[25]  Andrew N. Gray,et al.  Adaptive Ecosystem Management in the Pacific Northwest: a Case Study from Coastal Oregon , 2000 .

[26]  Ger Bergkamp,et al.  Flow: the essentials of environmental flows , 2002 .

[27]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .

[28]  Tove A. Larsen,et al.  Simulating development strategies for water supply systems , 2005 .

[29]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Transition to adaptive water management: the NeWater Project , 2005 .

[30]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[31]  Jon Norberg,et al.  Resilience Management in Social-ecological Systems: a Working Hypothesis for a Participatory Approach , 2002 .

[32]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Complex Adaptive Systems: Use and Analysis of Complex Adaptive Systems in Ecosystem Science: Overview of Special Section , 1998, Ecosystems.

[33]  Brian Richter,et al.  ECOLOGICALLY SUSTAINABLE WATER MANAGEMENT: MANAGING RIVER FLOWS FOR ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY , 2003 .