Impact of star formation inhomogeneities on merger rates and interpretation of LIGO results

Within the next decade, ground based gravitational-wave detectors are in principle capable of determining the compact object merger rate per unit volume of the local universe to better than 20% with more than 30 detections. These measurements will constrain our models of stellar, binary and star cluster evolution in the nearby present-day and ancient universe. We argue that the stellar models are sensitive to heterogeneities (in age and metallicity at least) in such a way that the predicted merger rates are subject to an additional 30–50% systematic errors unless these heterogeneities are taken into account. Without adding new electromagnetic constraints on massive binary evolution or relying on more information from each merger (e.g., binary masses and spins), as few as the ≃ 5 merger detections could exhaust the information available in a naive comparison to merger rate predictions. As a concrete example immediately relevant to analysis of initial and enhanced LIGO results, we use a nearby-universe catalog to demonstrate that no one tracer of stellar content can be consistently used to constrain merger rates without introducing a systematic error of order O(30%) at 90% confidence (depending on the type of binary involved). For example, though binary black holes typically take many Gyr to merge, binary neutron stars often merge rapidly; different tracers of stellar content are required for these two types. More generally, we argue that theoretical binary evolution can depend sufficiently sensitively on star-forming conditions—even assuming no uncertainty in binary evolution model—that the distribution of star-forming conditions must be incorporated to reduce the systematic error in merger rate predictions below roughly 40%. We emphasize that the degree of sensitivity to star-forming conditions depends on the binary evolution model and on the amount of relevant variation in star-forming conditions. For example, if after further comparison with electromagnetic and gravitational-wave observations future population synthesis models suggest all BH-BH binary mergers occur promptly and therefore are associated with well-studied present-day star formation, the associated composition-related systematic uncertainty could be lower than the pessimistic value quoted above. Further, as gravitational-wave detectors will make available many properties of each merger—binary component masses, spins and even short GRB associations and host galaxies could be available—many detections can still be exploited to create high-precision constraints on binary compact object formation models.

[1]  Chris L. Fryer,et al.  THE EFFECT OF METALLICITY ON THE DETECTION PROSPECTS FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES , 2010, 1004.0386.

[2]  Los Alamos National Laboratory,et al.  BINARY COMPACT OBJECT COALESCENCE RATES: THE ROLE OF ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES , 2009, 0908.3635.

[3]  Chunglee Kim,et al.  PULSAR BINARY BIRTHRATES WITH SPIN-OPENING ANGLE CORRELATIONS , 2009, 0908.2049.

[4]  J. Vink Mass loss and the evolution of massive stars , 2008 .

[5]  A. Heavens,et al.  The cosmic evolution of metallicity from the SDSS fossil record , 2008, 0804.3091.

[6]  Cambridge,et al.  The evolution of stellar mass and the implied star formation history , 2008, 0801.1594.

[7]  T. Bulik,et al.  The Total Merger Rate of Compact Object Binaries in the Local Universe , 2007, 0710.0878.

[8]  N. University,et al.  Short Gamma-Ray Bursts and Binary Mergers in Spiral and Elliptical Galaxies: Redshift Distribution and Hosts , 2007, 0706.4139.

[9]  Vicky Kalogera,et al.  Host Galaxies Catalog Used in LIGO Searches for Compact Binary Coalescence Events , 2007, 0706.1283.

[10]  et al,et al.  Search for gravitational waves from binary inspirals in S3 and S4 LIGO data , 2007, 0704.3368.

[11]  N. University,et al.  Constraining Population Synthesis Models via Empirical Binary Compact Object Merger and Supernova Rates , 2006, astro-ph/0610076.

[12]  Heidelberg,et al.  A census of metals and baryons in stars in the local universe , 2007, 0708.0533.

[13]  Astronomy,et al.  The Calibration of Mid-Infrared Star Formation Rate Indicators , 2007, 0705.3377.

[14]  S. Roweis,et al.  K-Corrections and Filter Transformations in the Ultraviolet, Optical, and Near-Infrared , 2006, astro-ph/0606170.

[15]  O. Pols,et al.  Modelling the formation of double white dwarfs , 2006, astro-ph/0610492.

[16]  H. Schatz,et al.  X-ray binaries , 2006, astro-ph/0607624.

[17]  P. Ventura,et al.  Modeling the Closest Double Degenerate System RX J0806.3+1527 and Its Decreasing Period , 2006, astro-ph/0606577.

[18]  D. Calzetti,et al.  Ultraviolet through Far-Infrared Spatially Resolved Analysis of the Recent Star Formation in M81 (NGC 3031) , 2006, astro-ph/0605605.

[19]  M. Fukugita,et al.  The History of Cosmological Star Formation: Three Independent Approaches and a Critical Test Using the Extragalactic Background Light , 2006, astro-ph/0603257.

[20]  V. Kalogera,et al.  Formation and progenitor of PSR J0737-3039 : New constraints on the supernova explosion forming pulsar B , 2006, astro-ph/0602024.

[21]  A. Hopkins,et al.  On the Normalization of the Cosmic Star Formation History , 2006, astro-ph/0601463.

[22]  T. Regimbau,et al.  Expected Coalescence Rates of Ns-Ns Binaries for Laser Beam Interferometers , 2005, astro-ph/0510727.

[23]  M. Cuntz,et al.  A New Version of Reimers’ Law of Mass Loss Based on a Physical Approach , 2005, astro-ph/0507598.

[24]  D. Lorimer,et al.  A statistical study of 233 pulsar proper motions , 2005, astro-ph/0504584.

[25]  N. University,et al.  Constraining Population Synthesis Models via the Binary Neutron Star Population , 2005, astro-ph/0504479.

[26]  G. Nelemans,et al.  Reconstructing the evolution of white dwarf binaries: further evidence for an alternative algorithm for the outcome of the common-envelope phase in close binaries , 2004, astro-ph/0410301.

[27]  J. Dunlop,et al.  The star-formation history of the Universe from the stellar populations of nearby galaxies , 2004, Nature.

[28]  V. Kalogera,et al.  Gravitational Waves from Extragalactic Inspiraling Binaries: Selection Effects and Expected Detection Rates , 2004, astro-ph/0402091.

[29]  R. D. L. F. Marcos,et al.  On the recent star formation history of the Milky Way disk , 2004, astro-ph/0401360.

[30]  S. Ballmer,et al.  Se p 20 03 Detector Description and Performance for the First Coincidence Observations between LIGO and GEO The LIGO Scientific Collaboration , 2008 .

[31]  B. C. Joshi,et al.  The Cosmic Coalescence Rates for Double Neutron Star Binaries , 2003, astro-ph/0312101.

[32]  P. Kroupa,et al.  Galactic-Field Initial Mass Functions of Massive Stars , 2003 .

[33]  P. Prugniel,et al.  Hyperleda. I. Identification and designation of galaxies , 2003 .

[34]  G. Bruzual,et al.  Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003 , 2003, astro-ph/0309134.

[35]  Galactic-Field IMFs of Massive Stars , 2003, astro-ph/0308356.

[36]  R. Nichol,et al.  Star Formation Rate Indicators in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2003, astro-ph/0306621.

[37]  R. Nichol,et al.  The Galaxy Luminosity Function and Luminosity Density at Redshift z = 0.1 , 2002, astro-ph/0210215.

[38]  Tomasz Bulik,et al.  A Comprehensive Study of Binary Compact Objects as Gravitational Wave Sources: Evolutionary Channels, Rates, and Physical Properties , 2001, astro-ph/0111452.

[39]  Philipp Podsiadlowski,et al.  Submitted to ApJ Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 21/08/00 EVOLUTIONARY BINARY SEQUENCES FOR LOW- AND INTERMEDIATE-MASS X-RAY BINARIES , 2001 .

[40]  R. Narayan,et al.  The Coalescence Rate of Double Neutron Star Systems , 2000, astro-ph/0012038.

[41]  E. Bell,et al.  Stellar Mass-to-Light Ratios and the Tully-Fisher Relation , 2000, astro-ph/0008056.

[42]  John Scott Drilling,et al.  in Allen''''s Astrophysical Quantities , 2000 .

[43]  C. Maraston Evolutionary synthesis of stellar populations: a modular tool , 1998, astro-ph/9807338.

[44]  Jr.,et al.  STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES ALONG THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE , 1998, astro-ph/9807187.

[45]  Zhanwen Han The formation of double degenerates and related objects , 1998 .

[46]  Flanagan,et al.  Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary's parameters from the inspiral waveform? , 1994, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[47]  J. Paradijs,et al.  Binary pulsars as probes of neutron star birth , 1992 .

[48]  E. Phinney The Rate of Neutron Star Binary Mergers in the Universe: Minimal Predictions for Gravity Wave Detectors , 1991 .

[49]  D. Hunter,et al.  Star formation histories of irregular galaxies , 1984 .

[50]  Walter H. G. Lewin,et al.  X-ray binaries. , 1976 .