THE ROLE OF ATTENUATED CULTURE IN SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION THEORY

Current criminological research rooted in social disorganization theory has primarily focused on structural disorganization and has largely ignored the role of cultural disorganization. This paper develops the theoretical role of cultural disorganization in the contemporary social disorganization model, integrating aspects of both the systemic model and a cultural attenuation model. This model is empirically examined using structural equation modeling. Survey data from residents in 66 neighborhoods in a Southern state provide the primary data. In part, the findings show that concentrated disadvantage and the level of social ties affect cultural strength, which in turn significantly affects informal social control. These findings demonstrate the relevance of weakened culture in explaining informal social control and call for further theoretical expansion of social disorganization models to include cultural disorganization.

[1]  Glenn L. Pierce,et al.  REEXAMINING SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION THEORY USING CALLS TO THE POLICE AS A MEASURE OF CRIME , 1993 .

[2]  A. Liska,et al.  EXTENDING SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION THEORY: MODELING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN COHESION, DISORDER, AND FEAR* , 2001 .

[3]  J. Jaccard,et al.  LISREL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1998 .

[4]  Paul E. Bellair.  SOCIAL INTERACTION AND COMMUNITY CRIME: EXAMINING THE IMPORTANCE OF NEIGHBOR NETWORKS , 1997 .

[5]  William Julius Wilson,et al.  When Work Disappears: New Implications for Race and Urban Poverty in the Global Economy , 1998, Celebrating 40 Years of Ethnic and Racial Studies.

[6]  M. Janowitz,et al.  Community Attachment in Mass Society , 1974 .

[7]  B. Silver,et al.  Measuring Political Culture in Multiethnic Societies , 2000 .

[8]  Barbara D. Warner,et al.  Local Social Ties in a Community and Crime Model: Questioning the Systemic Nature of Informal Social Control , 1997 .

[9]  R. Wright,et al.  STICK-UP, STREET CULTURE, AND OFFENDER MOTIVATION* , 1999 .

[10]  D. Elliott,et al.  The Effects of Neighborhood Disadvantage on Adolescent Development , 1996 .

[11]  Ann Swidler.  CULTURE IN ACTION: SYMBOLS AND STRATEGIES* , 1986 .

[12]  R. Sampson,et al.  Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-Disorganization Theory , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Mary E Pattillo,et al.  Sweet Mothers and Gangbangers: Managing Crime in a Black Middle-Class Neighborhood , 1998 .

[14]  Lauren J. Krivo,et al.  Extremely Disadvantaged Neighborhoods and Urban Crime , 1996 .

[15]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence , 2001 .

[16]  R. Sampson.  Collective Regulation of Adolescent Misbehavior , 1997 .

[17]  R. Sampson,et al.  Legal Cynicism and (Subcultural?) Tolerance of Deviance: The Neighborhood Context of Racial Differences , 1998 .

[18]  B. Warner.  Whither Poverty? Social Disorganization Theory in an Era of Urban Transformation , 1999 .

[19]  P. W. Rountree,et al.  IMPLICATIONS OF GHETTO-RELATED BEHAVIOR FOR A COMMUNITY AND CRIME MODEL , 2000 .

[20]  Robert J. Bursik,et al.  SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION AND THEORIES OF CRIME AND DELINQUENCY: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS* , 1988 .

[21]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. , 1997, Science.

[22]  Philip Selznick,et al.  A Normative Theory of Culture , 1964 .

[23]  Robert J. Bursik,et al.  The Informal Control of Crime Through Neighborhood Networks , 1999 .