The Fear Factor: How It Affects Students Learning to Program in a Tertiary Environment

Introduction "Learning and teaching are central activities in the increasingly complex and multi-facetted educational enterprises that are a prominent feature of post-industrial societies" (Hager, 2005, p. 633). Research into educational methods and theories is an ongoing process that covers many disciplines. In the Computer Science and Information Systems fields, there has been much concern regarding both the learning and teaching of computer programming and the high attrition rates associated with these courses (Robins, Rountree & Rountree, 2003). In spite of many years of research, it would appear that there is still a global problem within the educational environment relating to computer programming (Mead et al., 2006). The focus of many studies has been on improving the quality of teaching, aiming to make it more efficient and effective. However, it appears that less attention has been paid to the experience of learning to program from the students' perspective, and understanding what, in their perception, are the difficulties presented by the nature of programming. In the words of Jenkins (2002, p. 53), "If students struggle to learn something, it follows that this thing is for some reason difficult to learn." It would seem that in order to teach more effectively, it is essential for educators to have an understanding of what it is about programming that makes learning it so troublesome for many students worldwide. This paper reports on a study that was conducted to understand and describe how students personally experience fear whilst learning programming and to investigate whether this fear affects other aspects related to their studies, such as self-confidence, time management, and problem solving skills, all of which are needed in order to succeed (Scott, 2008; Simon et al., 2006). Narratives of their experiences were analyzed and relationships between the units of meaning were elicited to formulate and propose a model as a concrete tool for educators interested in studying how the fears that beset programming students affect their learning. Fear, programming, and phenomenology were core concepts used in this study. "Fear" may be considered an overly emotional word, but for this study it should be regarded as a descriptor for denoting a lack of interest in, or lack of appreciation of, programming as a discipline. In other words, some students may be experiencing a lack of confidence or apprehension regarding their ability to code or program, rather than actual fear. "Programming", as used in this study, refers to the full systems development cycle. It includes learning the basic theoretical concepts, as well as the practical act of coding, and having a final product ready for implementation. "Phenomenology" is an interpretive research approach used to study human experiences (Bruce et al., 2004). It does not aim to categorize individuals but rather to detail the number of different ways people can experience a single phenomenon, which, in this study, is learning to program. It is anticipated that this research into the challenges and difficulties of learning to program, as encountered and narrated by the students themselves, will contribute to a deeper understanding of this area of concern for educationalists in general and tertiary programming educators in particular. It is also hoped that the research findings will provide useful insight for students who are also experiencing anxiety as a result of their struggle with learning programming. The Act of Learning to Program The teaching and learning of programming appears to be a subject of worldwide, historic concern. "Learning to program is notoriously considered difficult. In spite of more than forty years of experience, teaching programming is still considered a major challenge" (Caspersen & Bennedsen, 2007, p. 111). Many researchers regard programming courses as extremely demanding and the associated attrition rates high (Bergin & Reilly, 2005a, 2005b; Boyle, Carter, & Clark 2002); Gomes & Mendes, 2007a, 2007b; Jenkins, 2002; Simon et al. …

[1]  R. Perry,et al.  Attributional (explanatory) thinking about failure in new achievement settings , 2008 .

[2]  L. Thomas,et al.  A cognitive approach to identifying measurable milestones for programming skill acquisition , 2006, ITiCSE-WGR '06.

[3]  Robert McCartney,et al.  Successful students' strategies for getting unstuck , 2007, ITiCSE.

[4]  Kosheek Sewchurran,et al.  Toward an approach to create self‐organizing and reflexive information systems project practitioners , 2008 .

[5]  Lawrence Buckingham,et al.  Ways of Experiencing the Act of Learning to Program: A Phenomenographic Study of Introductory Programming Students at University , 2004, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[6]  Elsje Scott,et al.  From Requirements to Code: Issues and Learning in IS Students' Systems Development Projects , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Innov. Pract..

[7]  Brenda Cantwell Wilson,et al.  Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: a study of twelve factors , 2001, SIGCSE '01.

[8]  Lynda Thomas,et al.  Scaffolding with object diagrams in first year programming classes: some unexpected results , 2004, SIGCSE '04.

[9]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Case Study Research in Education : A Qualitative Approach , 1991 .

[10]  Meriel Huggard,et al.  Object oriented programming and program correctness: the students' perspective , 2006, ICER '06.

[11]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Learning to program and learning to think: what's the connection? , 1986, CACM.

[13]  Paul De Palma,et al.  Viewpoint: Why women avoid computer science , 2001, CACM.

[14]  Anabela Gomes,et al.  Learning to program - difficulties and solutions , 2007 .

[15]  J. Gass,et al.  Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference? , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[16]  Juhani Tuovinen,et al.  Optimising student cognitive load in computer education , 2000, ACSE '00.

[17]  Anders Berglund,et al.  What does it take to learn 'programming thinking'? , 2005, ICER '05.

[18]  Margaret Hamilton,et al.  Transforming learning of programming: a mentoring project , 2008, ACE '08.

[19]  M. N. Saunders,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students (4th edn, Vietnamese language edition) , 2011 .

[20]  Ian Mcpherson Reflexive Learning: Stages towards wisdom with Dreyfus , 2005 .

[21]  Looking toward the 21 st Century : Challenges of Educational Theory and Practice , 1999 .

[22]  C. Moustakas Phenomenological Research Methods , 1994 .

[23]  Susan Bergin,et al.  Programming: factors that influence success , 2005 .

[24]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[25]  A. Schoenfeld Looking Toward the 21st Century: Challenges of Educational Theory and Practice , 1999 .

[26]  P. Byrne,et al.  The effect of student attributes on success in programming , 2001, ITiCSE '01.

[27]  Dianne Hagan,et al.  Does it help to have some programming experience before beginning a computing degree program? , 2000, ITiCSE '00.

[28]  Roland N. Ibbett,et al.  Grand Challenges in Computing: Education - A Summary , 2005, Comput. J..

[29]  Margaret Hamilton,et al.  Predictors of success in a first programming course , 2006 .

[30]  Education Two How Far is Distance Learning from Education , 2006 .

[31]  Bruria Haberman,et al.  Pattern-oriented instruction and its influence on problem decomposition and solution construction , 2007, ITiCSE.

[32]  Janet Rountree,et al.  Learning and Teaching Programming: A Review and Discussion , 2003, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[33]  Kosheek Sewchurran,et al.  Reflection-in-Action: Using Experience to Reconstruct Meaning in a Learning Environment , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering.

[34]  Ronan G. Reilly,et al.  The Influence of Motivation and Comfort-Level on Learning to Program , 2005, PPIG.

[35]  Leslie Schwartzman,et al.  A qualitative analysis of reflective and defensive student responses in a software engineering and design course , 2006, Baltic Sea '06.

[36]  Forrest Shull,et al.  To Game or Not to Game? , 2009, IEEE Software.

[37]  Robert McCartney,et al.  Can graduating students design software systems? , 2006, SIGCSE '06.

[38]  B. Weiner,et al.  Reflections on the history of attribution theory and research: People, personalities, publications, problems. , 2008 .

[39]  Kirsti Ala-Mutka,et al.  A study of the difficulties of novice programmers , 2005, ITiCSE '05.

[40]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[41]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning , 2002 .

[42]  Judy Kay,et al.  Supporting reflection in introductory computer science , 2000, SIGCSE '00.

[43]  Maria Bannert,et al.  Managing Cognitive Load--Recent Trends in Cognitive Load Theory. Commentary. , 2002 .

[44]  Leon E. Winslow,et al.  Programming pedagogy—a psychological overview , 1996, SGCS.

[45]  A. Giorgi,et al.  The Theory, Practice, and Evaluation of the Phenomenological Method as a Qualitative Research Procedure , 1997 .

[46]  P. Hager New Approaches in the Philosophy of Learning , 2005 .

[47]  Robert McCartney,et al.  Through the eyes of instructors: a phenomenographic investigation of student success , 2007, ICER '07.

[48]  Raymond Lister,et al.  Not seeing the forest for the trees: novice programmers and the SOLO taxonomy , 2006, ITICSE '06.

[49]  António José Mendes,et al.  An environment to improve programming education , 2007, CompSysTech '07.

[50]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  A multi-national, multi-institutional study of assessment of programming skills of first-year CS students , 2001, ITiCSE-WGR '01.

[51]  R. Boyle,et al.  What Makes Them Succeed? Entry, progression and graduation in Computer Science , 2002 .

[52]  Alistair Cockburn,et al.  Agile Software Development , 2001 .