Quantum Network Coding for General Graphs

Network coding is often explained by using a small network model called Butterfly. In this network, there are two flow paths, s_1 to t_1 and s_2 to t_2, which share a single bottleneck channel of capacity one. So, if we consider conventional flow (of liquid, for instance), then the total amount of flow must be at most one in total, say 1/2 for each path. However, if we consider information flow, then we can send two bits (one for each path) at the same time by exploiting two side links, which are of no use for the liquid-type flow, and encoding/decoding operations at each node. This is known as network coding and has been quite popular since its introduction by Ahlswede, Cai, Li and Yeung in 2000. In QIP 2006, Hayashi et al showed that quantum network coding is possible for Butterfly, namely we can send two qubits simultaneously with keeping their fidelity strictly greater than 1/2. In this paper, we show that the result can be extended to a large class of general graphs by using a completely different approach. The underlying technique is a new cloning method called entanglement-free cloning which does not produce any entanglement at all. This seems interesting on its own and to show its possibility is an even more important purpose of this paper. Combining this new cloning with approximation of general quantum states by a small number of fixed ones, we can design a quantum network coding protocol which ``simulates'' its classical counterpart for the same graph.

[1]  Robert D. Kleinberg,et al.  Comparing Network Coding with Multicommodity Flow for the k-pairs Communication Problem , 2004 .

[2]  Rudy Raymond,et al.  (4,1)-Quantum random access coding does not exist—one qubit is not enough to recover one of four bits , 2006, quant-ph/0604061.

[3]  G. Guo,et al.  Probabilistic Cloning and Identification of Linearly Independent Quantum States , 1998, quant-ph/9804064.

[4]  Stephen M. Barnett,et al.  Strategies and networks for state-dependent quantum cloning , 1999 .

[5]  W. Wootters,et al.  A single quantum cannot be cloned , 1982, Nature.

[6]  Rudolf Ahlswede,et al.  Network information flow , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  Mark Hillery,et al.  QUANTUM COPYING : FUNDAMENTAL INEQUALITIES , 1997 .

[8]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[9]  D. Karger,et al.  On Coding for Non-Multicast Networks ∗ , 2003 .

[10]  P. Kam,et al.  : 4 , 1898, You Can Cross the Massacre on Foot.

[11]  April Rasala Lehman Network coding , 2005 .

[12]  Robert D. Kleinberg,et al.  On the capacity of information networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[13]  R. Werner OPTIMAL CLONING OF PURE STATES , 1998, quant-ph/9804001.

[14]  Buzek,et al.  Quantum copying: Beyond the no-cloning theorem. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[15]  D. Bruß,et al.  Optimal universal and state-dependent quantum cloning , 1997, quant-ph/9705038.

[16]  Masahito Hayashi,et al.  Quantum Network Coding , 2006, STACS.

[17]  E. Soljanin,et al.  On Multicast in Quantum Networks , 2006, 2006 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[18]  S. Massar,et al.  Optimal Quantum Cloning Machines , 1997, quant-ph/9705046.