Using ontologies for users-groups matching in an annotation system

Representing a domain knowledge through an ontology allows people and systems to share a common corpus of knowledge for reasoning and communicating. We have recently introduced groups to the MADCOW annotation system, and in this paper we describe how the integration of ontologies allows more refined annotations to be posted on groups focused on some domain. In particular, concepts of the domain ontology can be used as tags, which are integral components of annotations, thus allowing more semantically significant queries for retrieving annotations on specific topics. Services for promoting participation to groups of potentially interested users can also be fostered by the adoption of domain ontologies. For example, authors of annotations systematically using tags referrable to some existing ontology can be invited to join groups based on that ontology. Conversely, the analysis of texts of annotations, or of annotated texts, associated with some ontology, can represent a useful addition to construct associations between the ontology concepts and the set of lexical terms associated with them.

[1]  Sean Bechhofer,et al.  OWL: Web Ontology Language , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[2]  Sunghwan Lee,et al.  Product Matching through Ontology Mapping in Comparison Shopping , 2006, iiWAS.

[3]  Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran,et al.  What are ontologies, and why do we need them? , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[4]  Edith Schonberg,et al.  Matching Patient Records to Clinical Trials Using Ontologies , 2007, ISWC/ASWC.

[5]  Simon Buckingham Shum,et al.  Knowledge Representation with Ontologies: The Present and Future , 2004, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[6]  Maryam Fazel-Zarandi,et al.  Reasoning about Skills and Competencies , 2010, PRO-VE.

[7]  Sean Bechhofer,et al.  OWL: Web Ontology Language , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[8]  J. Paralič,et al.  Ontology-based Information Retrieval , 2003 .

[9]  Henrik Bulskov Styltsvig Ontology-based Information Retrieval , 2006 .

[10]  Marta Mattoso,et al.  Using ontologies for domain information retrieval , 2000, Proceedings 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.

[11]  Stefan Decker,et al.  Ontology-Based Resource Matching in the Grid - The Grid Meets the Semantic Web , 2003, SEMWEB.

[12]  Stefano Levialdi,et al.  MADCOW: a multimedia digital annotation system , 2004, AVI.

[13]  Pablo Castells,et al.  An Ontology-Based Information Retrieval Model , 2005, ESWC.

[14]  Pablo Castells,et al.  Enriching Group Profiles with Ontologies for Knowledge-Driven Colalborative Content Retrieval , 2006, 15th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE'06).

[15]  Yi Zhang,et al.  OntoSearch: An Ontology Search Engine , 2004, SGAI Conf..

[16]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Ontologies: principles, methods and applications , 1996, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[17]  Danilo Avola,et al.  Managing Groups and Group Annotations in madcow , 2010, DNIS.

[18]  Leonardo Contreras,et al.  Shared Ontologies to Increase Systems Interoperatibiliy in University Institutions , 2007 .

[19]  Stefan Seedorf,et al.  Applications of Ontologies in Software Engineering , 2006 .