How selfish individuals achieve unselfish goals: majority-based progressive control of discrete event systems

ABSTRACT We present majority-based progressive control in which local supervisors have not only their own private specifications as primary goals, but an additional global specification representing a desirable behavior of the overall system. The control policy follows the majority rule, and the ultimate goal is to achieve a progressive closed-loop behavior whereby the number of local supervisors meeting private specifications increases as the controlled system evolves. For this purpose, we present the notion of majority-controllability of a global specification, and show that it is a crucial condition for the existence of local supervisors achieving a progressive global specification. Using the presented control theory, we analyze how the federal estate tax in the Unites States was repealed in 2010.

[1]  P. Ramadge,et al.  Supervisory control of a class of discrete event processes , 1987 .

[2]  S. Karp,et al.  Digital system design in the presence of single event upsets , 1993 .

[3]  Moshe Kam,et al.  Decision fusion and supervisor synthesis in decentralized discrete-event systems , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[4]  Stéphane Lafortune,et al.  A General Architecture for Decentralized Supervisory Control of Discrete-Event Systems , 2002, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[5]  Shigemasa Takai,et al.  Inference-Based Ambiguity Management in Decentralized Decision-Making: Decentralized Control of Discrete Event Systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[6]  S. Laurie Ricker,et al.  Knowledge Is a Terrible Thing to Waste: Using Inference in Discrete-Event Control Problems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[7]  M.R. Iravani,et al.  Discrete-Event Systems Supervisory Control for a Dynamic Flow Controller , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[8]  Ahmed Khoumsi,et al.  A new method for centralised and modular supervisory control of real-time discrete event systems , 2010, Int. J. Control.

[9]  Hai Lin,et al.  Reliable supervisory control for general architecture of decentralized discrete event systems , 2010, Autom..

[10]  Ramakrishna Gummadi,et al.  On Tractable Instances of Modular Supervisory Control , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[11]  Seong-Jin Park Non-blocking supervisory control of dynamic competitive markets , 2011 .

[12]  Zhaoan Wang,et al.  Modular supervisory control and coordination of state tree structures , 2013, Int. J. Control.

[13]  Feng Lin,et al.  Decentralized control of networked discrete event systems with communication delays , 2014, Autom..

[14]  Emmanuel Saez,et al.  Inequality in the long run , 2014, Science.

[15]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  A Petri Net-Based Discrete-Event Control of Automated Manufacturing Systems With Assembly Operations , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[16]  Jörg Raisch,et al.  A Supervisory Control Theory Approach to Control Gene Regulatory Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  Jung-Min Yang Static feedback control of switched asynchronous sequential machines , 2017, Syst. Control. Lett..