Evaluation of spectrum access options for indoor mobile network deployment

The investments in indoor mobile networks are highly related to the spectrum availability and its associated authorization options. The aim of this paper is to discuss the differences in the spectrum demand taking into consideration both wide and local area network deployment requirements and the kind of actor that provides the indoor wireless access. The analysis covers different authorizations options namely licensed, unlicensed, licensed shared access (LSA) and secondary access. A quantitative approach is used to analyze the differences between macrocell and femtocell deployments focusing on deployment cost and spectrum demand. This is complemented by a qualitative study to explore and discuss the strategic business decisions of different actors in view of the available spectrum bands and spectrum authorization options. The main conclusions from this study are; spectrum has more value in macrocell deployment scenarios than in femtocell ones. More spectrum in macrocell deployment scenarios means that operators can deploy less number of new sites and exploit previous infrastructure investments. Femtocell networks are often coverage limited which allows for frequency re-use. As a consequence, the value of spectrum is not the same for mobile network operators (MNOs) and for local network operator (LNOs). MNOs are traditionally confined to macrocell deployment strategies which entail the exclusive usage of licensed bands. While, the use of licensed spectrum by LNOs may incur more cost than the cost of infrastructure deployment. This explains why the use of unlicensed bands is lucrative and viable for LNOs. Furthermore, the LSA scheme may or could soon become an enabler for LNO's business due to the prevailing technical, regulation and policies developments.

[1]  Liu Cui,et al.  The hinges of destiny: A decision analysis of spectrum users' choices , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks.

[2]  Jan Markendahl,et al.  Business models for deployment and operation of femtocell networks : Are new cooperation strategies needed for mobile operators? , 2010 .

[3]  Gerhard Schwabe,et al.  International Telecommunication Union. Systems Management: Summarization function. Recommendation X.738 , 2004 .

[4]  Petri Mähönen,et al.  Riding the data tsunami in the cloud: myths and challenges in future wireless access , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  John Cosmas,et al.  Future Wireless Networks for Indoor Applications , 2011 .

[6]  Jan Markendahl,et al.  Valuation of spectrum for mobile broadband services: Engineering value versus willingness to pay , 2011 .

[7]  Jens Zander,et al.  Cost Efficient High Capacity Indoor Wireless Access: Denser Wi-Fi or Coordinated Pico-cellular? , 2012, ArXiv.

[8]  Suzan Bayhan,et al.  Cognitive femtocell networks: an overlay architecture for localized dynamic spectrum access [Dynamic Spectrum Management] , 2010, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[9]  Jungwon Yeo,et al.  Estimation of Bidder Valuations in an FCC Spectrum Auction , 2009 .

[10]  Annalisa Durantini,et al.  The spectrum policy reform paving the way to cognitive radio enabled spectrum sharing , 2013 .

[11]  Jean C. Walrand,et al.  Economics of Femtocells , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[12]  Xiaojiang Du,et al.  Cognitive femtocell networks: an opportunistic spectrum access for future indoor wireless coverage , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[13]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Downlink Spectrum Sharing for Cognitive Radio Femtocell Networks , 2010, IEEE Systems Journal.

[14]  Marina Petrova,et al.  Wi-Fi, but not on Steroids: Performance analysis of a Wi-Fi-like Network operating in TVWS under realistic conditions , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[15]  Zoraida Frias,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of femtocell deployment in long-term evolution networks , 2012, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[16]  Jan Markendahl,et al.  A comparative study of deployment options, capacity and cost structure for macrocellular and femtocell networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications Workshops.

[17]  Marina Petrova,et al.  On the scalability of cognitive radio: assessing the commercial viability of secondary spectrum access , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[18]  Ekram Hossain,et al.  Radio Resource Management in Wireless Networks , .

[19]  Mehdi Bennis,et al.  On spectrum sharing with underlaid femtocell networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications Workshops.

[20]  Anand Kishore Raju,et al.  Femtocell deployment strategies for MVNOs enabled by cognitive sharing , 2012, 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC).

[21]  Lan Chen,et al.  Hybrid Spectrum Usage for Overlaying LTE Macrocell and Femtocell , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[22]  Antonio Nicita,et al.  Authorised Shared Access (ASA): An Innovative Model of Pro-Competitive Spectrum Management , 2011 .