Evaluating the impact of classification algorithms and spatial resolution on the accuracy of land cover mapping in a mountain environment in Pakistan

Satellite images of various spatial resolutions and different image classification techniques have been utilized for land cover (LC) mapping at local and regional scale studies. Mapping capabilities and achievable accuracies of LC classification in a mountain environment are, however, influenced by the spatial resolution of the utilized images and applied classification techniques. Hence, developing and characterizing regionally optimized methods are essential for the planning and monitoring of natural resources. In this study, the potential of four non-parametric image classification techniques, i.e., k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and neural network (NN) on the accuracy of LC classification was evaluated in the Hindu Kush mountains ranges of northern Pakistan. Moreover, we have assessed the impact of the spatial resolution of the utilized satellite imagery, i.e., SPOT-5 with 2.5 m and Landsat-8 with 30 m on the accuracy of the derived LC classification. For the classification of LC based on SPOT-5, we have achieved the highest overall classification accuracy (OCA) = 89% with kappa coefficient (KC = 0.86) using SVM followed by k-NN, RF, and NN. However, for LC classification derived from Landsat-8 imagery, we achieved the highest OCA = 71% with KC = 0.59 using RF and SVM followed by k-NN and NN. The higher accuracy derived from SPOT-5 versus Landsat-8 indicated that the results of LC classification based on SPOT-5 are more accurate and reliable than Landsat-8. The findings of the present study will be useful for the classification and mapping task of LC in a mountain environment using SPOT-5 and Landsat-8 at local and regional scale studies.

[1]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Making better use of accuracy data in land change studies: Estimating accuracy and area and quantifying uncertainty using stratified estimation , 2013 .

[2]  I. Dimopoulos,et al.  Artificial neural networks as a classification method in the behavioural sciences , 1997, Behavioural Processes.

[3]  Corina da Costa Freitas,et al.  Land Use/Land Cover Classification in the Brazilian Amazon with Different Sensor Data and Classification Algorithms , 2013 .

[4]  Xiaoguang Jiang,et al.  Comparison of artificial neural networks and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification in Northern China using a SPOT-5 HRG image , 2012 .

[5]  Francisca López-Granados,et al.  Object- and pixel-based analysis for mapping crops and their agro-environmental associated measures using QuickBird imagery , 2009 .

[6]  Eric Koomen,et al.  Modelling Land-Use Change , 2007 .

[7]  F. Maselli,et al.  Using SPOT images and field sampling to map burn severity and vegetation factors affecting post forest fire erosion risk , 2008 .

[8]  James R. Anderson,et al.  A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data , 1976 .

[9]  Neelam Aziz,et al.  Land use change mapping and analysis using Remote Sensing and GIS: A case study of Simly watershed, Islamabad, Pakistan , 2015 .

[10]  Qi Chen,et al.  A comparison of classification techniques to support land cover and land use analysis in tropical coastal zones , 2011 .

[11]  Roger Bivand,et al.  Bindings for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library , 2015 .

[12]  Muhammad Shafique,et al.  Spatial assessment of forest cover and land-use changes in the Hindu-Kush mountain ranges of northern Pakistan , 2016, Journal of Mountain Science.

[13]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  A relative evaluation of multiclass image classification by support vector machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  J. Anthony Gualtieri,et al.  Support vector machines for hyperspectral remote sensing classification , 1999, Other Conferences.

[15]  Robert J. Mericsko,et al.  27th Aipr Workshop: Advances in Computer-Assisted Recognition , 1999 .

[16]  David Meyer,et al.  Support Vector Machines ∗ The Interface to libsvm in package , 2001 .

[17]  Henk J. Scholten,et al.  Modelling Land-use change; Progress and Applications , 2007 .

[18]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Landsat-8: Science and Product Vision for Terrestrial Global Change Research , 2014 .

[19]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Global Land Cover Mapping: A Review and Uncertainty Analysis , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[20]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Optical remotely sensed time series data for land cover classification: A review , 2016 .

[21]  A. B. Baki,et al.  Riverbank migration and island dynamics of the braided Jamuna River of the Ganges–Brahmaputra basin using multi-temporal Landsat images , 2012 .

[22]  Annemarie Schneider,et al.  Monitoring land cover change in urban and peri-urban areas using dense time stacks of Landsat satellite data and a data mining approach , 2012 .

[23]  D. Lu,et al.  Extraction of urban impervious surfaces from an IKONOS image , 2009 .

[24]  Andrew Jarvis,et al.  Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4 , 2008 .

[25]  David T. Hansen,et al.  TECHNIQUES FOR DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN AGRICULTURE AND SIMILAR LAND COVER TYPES WITH FUZZY LOGIC AND SPECTRAL POLYGON CHARACTERISTICS , 2006 .

[26]  Qihao Weng,et al.  A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance , 2007 .

[27]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[28]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Random Forest classification of Mediterranean land cover using multi-seasonal imagery and multi-seasonal texture , 2012 .

[29]  Freek D. van der Meer,et al.  Impact of DEM source and resolution on topographic seismic amplification , 2011, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[30]  C. Proisy,et al.  Predicting and mapping mangrove biomass from canopy grain analysis using Fourier-based textural ordination of IKONOS images , 2007 .

[31]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing , 2005 .

[32]  Yang Shao,et al.  Comparison of support vector machine, neural network, and CART algorithms for the land-cover classification using limited training data points , 2012 .

[33]  Jie Wang,et al.  Comparison of Classification Algorithms and Training Sample Sizes in Urban Land Classification with Landsat Thematic Mapper Imagery , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[34]  Andrew O. Finley,et al.  Delineation of forest/nonforest land use classes using nearest neighbor methods , 2004 .

[35]  M. Bauer,et al.  Estimation and mapping of forest stand density, volume, and cover type using the k-nearest neighbors method , 2001 .

[36]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Using LiDAR and quickbird data to model plant production and quantify uncertainties associated with wetland detection and land cover generalizations , 2009 .

[37]  Matthew J. Cracknell,et al.  Geological mapping using remote sensing data: A comparison of five machine learning algorithms, their response to variations in the spatial distribution of training data and the use of explicit spatial information , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[38]  Ronald E. McRoberts,et al.  Stratified estimation of forest area using satellite imagery, inventory data, and the k-Nearest Neighbors technique , 2002 .

[39]  Chen Xi,et al.  Mapping Deforestation and Forest Degradation Patterns in Western Himalaya, Pakistan , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[40]  Christophe Sannier,et al.  Mapping tree cover in European cities: Comparison of classification algorithms for an operational production framework , 2015, 2015 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event (JURSE).

[41]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[42]  Doreen S. Boyd,et al.  Mapping Complex Urban Land Cover from Spaceborne Imagery: The Influence of Spatial Resolution, Spectral Band Set and Classification Approach , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[43]  Sheng Ding,et al.  Classification of Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Images with Support Vector Machines and Particle Swarm Optimization , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Information Engineering and Computer Science.

[44]  Hassan Ali,et al.  Forest cover change assessment in conflict-affected areas of northwest Pakistan: the case of swat and shangla districts , 2012, Journal of Mountain Science.

[45]  Thomas R. Loveland,et al.  A review of large area monitoring of land cover change using Landsat data , 2012 .