Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles

This paper argues against the view that trolley cases are of little or no relevance to the ethics of automated vehicles. Four arguments for this view are outlined and rejected: the Not Going to Happen Argument, the Moral Difference Argument, the Impossible Deliberation Argument and the Wrong Question Argument. In making clear where these arguments go wrong, a positive account is developed of how trolley cases can inform the ethics of automated vehicles.

[1]  Geoff Keeling,et al.  Against Leben's Rawlsian Collision Algorithm for Autonomous Vehicles , 2017, PT-AI.

[2]  Joshua D. Greene.  Solving the Trolley Problem , 2016 .

[3]  John Broome,et al.  Rationality Through Reasoning , 2013 .

[4]  C. Allen,et al.  Artificial Morality: Top-down, Bottom-up, and Hybrid Approaches , 2005, Ethics and Information Technology.

[5]  J. Thomson,et al.  The Trolley Problem Mysteries , 2015 .

[6]  R. Crisp.  Utilitarianism and the Life of Virtue , 1992 .

[7]  Sven Nyholm.  The Ethics of Crashes with Self-Driving Cars: A Roadmap, II , 2018 .

[8]  R. Crisp.  Reasons and the Good , 2006 .

[9]  Derek Leben,et al.  A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles , 2017, Ethics and Information Technology.

[10]  S. Scheffler.  The Rejection of Consequentialism: A Philosophical Investigation of the Considerations Underlying Rival Moral Conceptions , 1984 .

[11]  Judith Jarvis Thomson,et al.  The Realm of Rights , 1992 .

[12]  J. Schreiber.  Foundations Of Statistics , 2016 .

[13]  B. Hooker.  Ideal Code, Real World , 2000 .

[14]  S. Vajda,et al.  GAMES AND DECISIONS; INTRODUCTION AND CRITICAL SURVEY. , 1958 .

[15]  Robert B. Hallborg,et al.  The Realm of Rights , 1995 .

[16]  R. Duff.  Towards a Modest Legal Moralism , 2014 .

[17]  Ibo van de Poel,et al.  Translating Values into Design Requirements , 2013 .

[18]  G. Keeling.  Legal Necessity, Pareto Efficiency & Justified Killing in Autonomous Vehicle Collisions , 2018 .

[19]  Shelly Kagan,et al.  The Additive Fallacy , 1988, Ethics.

[20]  Shelly Kagan,et al.  The limits of morality , 1989 .

[21]  G. Mecacci,et al.  Four Perspectives on What Matters for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles , 2019, Road Vehicle Automation 6.

[22]  Johannes Himmelreich.  Never Mind the Trolley: The Ethics of Autonomous Vehicles in Mundane Situations , 2018, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.

[23]  Patrick Lin.  Why Ethics Matters for Autonomous Cars , 2016 .

[24]  F. S. D. Sio.  Killing by Autonomous Vehicles and the Legal Doctrine of Necessity , 2017 .

[25]  André Vellino,et al.  Ethical Decision Making in Robots: Autonomy, Trust and Responsibility - Autonomy Trust and Responsibility , 2016, ICSR.

[26]  Noah J. Goodall,et al.  Ethical Decision Making during Automated Vehicle Crashes , 2014, ArXiv.

[27]  P. Foot.  The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect , 2020, The Doctrine of Double Effect.

[28]  A. Sen,et al.  Collective Choice and Social Welfare , 2017 .

[29]  J. Thomson.  Turning the Trolley , 2008 .

[30]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles , 2015, Science.

[31]  Noah J. Goodall,et al.  Away from Trolley Problems and Toward Risk Management , 2016, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[32]  G. Alvarez,et al.  Doubting Driverless Dilemmas , 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science.

[33]  Sven Nyholm,et al.  The Ethics of Accident-Algorithms for Self-Driving Cars: an Applied Trolley Problem? , 2016, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.

[34]  D. Brink.  Utilitarian Morality and the Personal Point of View , 1986 .

[35]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[36]  Jeffrey K. Gurney.  Crashing into the Unknown: An Examination of Crash-Optimization Algorithms Through the Two Lanes of Ethics and Law , 2016 .

[37]  J. Thomson.  Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. , 1976, The Monist.