Evaluating the Effectiveness of Stereotype User Models for Recommendations on Mobile Devices

Mobile recommender systems have been proven as a promising approach in mobile scenarios to support the decision making process of users by suggesting beneficial items in a certain mobile context. The main goal of this paper is to examine whether a stereotype user model leads to better recommendations as part of such a system. For this purpose, we developed and tested a prototype for a shopping scenario. Research on fashion stereotypes led to a user model containing ten different stereotypes. The stereotype classification is performed by computing the proximity of each stereotype to the user’s properties. Results of a user study show that a user model based on stereotypes generates better results than a recommender system without a stereotype-based user model. Moreover, stereotype-based user models allow personalized recommendations right away thus contributing to alleviating the cold start problem.

[1]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[2]  John Shawe-Taylor,et al.  Can eyes reveal interest? Implicit queries from gaze patterns , 2009, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[3]  Dorota Glowacka,et al.  Supporting Exploratory Search Through User Modeling , 2014, UMAP Workshops.

[4]  Ricardo Baeza-Yates,et al.  Modern Information Retrieval - the concepts and technology behind search, Second edition , 2011 .

[5]  Andrew Howes,et al.  Adaptive Interaction: A Utility Maximization Approach to Understanding Human Interaction with Technology , 2013, Adaptive Interaction: A Utility Maximization Approach to Understanding Human Interaction with Technology.

[6]  Xiaozhong Liu Generating metadata for cyberlearning resources through information retrieval and meta-search , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Dorota Glowacka,et al.  Directing exploratory search with interactive intent modeling , 2013, CIKM.

[8]  B. Cesnik,et al.  Digital Libraries , 2001, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[9]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal: A longitudinal case study , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[10]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving , 1964, Science.

[11]  Vincent P. Wade,et al.  Personalised Information Retrieval: survey and classification , 2013, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[12]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[13]  Rainer Alt,et al.  IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence , 2015, WI-IAT.

[14]  Francesco Osborne A POV-Based User Model: From Learning Preferences to Learning Personal Ontologies , 2013, UMAP.

[15]  Damianos Gavalas,et al.  A web-based pervasive recommendation system for mobile tourist guides , 2011, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[16]  David Heckerman,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for Collaborative Filtering , 1998, UAI.

[17]  Paolo Ferragina,et al.  A personalized search engine based on Web‐snippet hierarchical clustering , 2005, WWW '05.

[18]  Ana Arruarte Lasa,et al.  Identifying Meaningful Concept Map Elements from a Cultural Perspective , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[19]  Federica Cena,et al.  Propagating User Interests in Ontology-Based User Model , 2011, AI*IA.

[20]  Jaime Teevan,et al.  Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: a bibliography , 2003, SIGF.

[21]  Alessandro Micarelli,et al.  User Profiles for Personalized Information Access , 2007, The Adaptive Web.

[22]  Youngjoo Na,et al.  Relationship between the preference styles of music and fashion and the similarity of their sensibility , 2013 .

[23]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Construction of Ontology-Based User Model for Web Personalization , 2007, User Modeling.

[24]  Johanna Völker,et al.  Deployment of RDFa, Microdata, and Microformats on the Web - A Quantitative Analysis , 2013, International Semantic Web Conference.

[25]  Giulio Jacucci,et al.  Influence of Reading Speed on Pupil Size as a Measure of Perceived Relevance , 2014, UMAP Workshops.

[26]  Susan Gauch,et al.  Personalizing Search Based on User Search Histories , 2004 .

[27]  Qiong Luo,et al.  Towards Ontology Learning from Folksonomies , 2009, IJCAI.

[28]  Dorota Glowacka,et al.  Directing exploratory search: reinforcement learning from user interactions with keywords , 2013, IUI '13.

[29]  Li Chen,et al.  Interaction design guidelines on critiquing-based recommender systems , 2009, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[30]  Vincent P. Wade,et al.  Does Personalization Benefit Everyone in the Same Way? Multilingual Search Personalization for English vs. Non-English Users , 2014, UMAP Workshops.

[31]  Barbara M. Wildemuth,et al.  The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[32]  Mary C. Dyson,et al.  The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen , 2000 .

[33]  Saikat Guha,et al.  Privad: Practical Privacy in Online Advertising , 2011, NSDI.

[34]  Ben Adida hGRDDL: Bridging microformats and RDFa , 2008, J. Web Semant..

[35]  Sofia Stamou,et al.  Search personalization through query and page topical analysis , 2009, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[36]  Daniel M. Russell,et al.  Discriminating the relevance of web search results with measures of pupil size , 2009, CHI.

[37]  D. Turner Theory of Education , 2004 .

[38]  Andrej Kosir,et al.  Increasing Top-20 Search Results Diversity Through Recommendation Post-Processing , 2014, UMAP Workshops.

[39]  Xin Fu,et al.  Elicitation of term relevance feedback: an investigation of term source and context , 2006, SIGIR.

[40]  Bamshad Mobasher,et al.  Learning Ontology-Based User Profiles: A Semantic Approach to Personalized Web Search , 2007, IEEE Intell. Informatics Bull..

[41]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[42]  Ziming Liu,et al.  Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years , 2005, J. Documentation.

[43]  Mohand Boughanem,et al.  A session based personalized search using an ontological user profile , 2009, SAC '09.

[44]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Improving Web Search Ranking by Incorporating User Behavior Information , 2019, SIGIR Forum.

[45]  Samuel Kaski,et al.  Combining eye movements and collaborative filtering for proactive information retrieval , 2005, SIGIR '05.

[46]  Eve E. Hoggan,et al.  Information-seeking behaviors of computer scientists: Challenges for electronic literature search tools , 2013, ASIST.

[47]  Elaine Rich,et al.  User Modeling via Stereotypes , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[48]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Inferring word relevance from eye-movements of readers , 2011, IUI '11.

[49]  Catherine E. Tucker,et al.  When Does Retargeting Work? Information Specificity in Online Advertising , 2013 .

[50]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Adaptive Hypermedia , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[51]  Stefano Mizzaro,et al.  Ephemeral and Persistent Personalization in Adaptive Information Access to Scholarly Publications on the Web , 2002, AH.

[52]  Fabrizio Silvestri,et al.  Mining Query Logs: Turning Search Usage Data into Knowledge , 2010, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[53]  Dong Zhou,et al.  Multilingual Adaptive Search for Digital Libraries , 2011, TPDL.

[54]  Barry Smyth,et al.  Anonymous personalization in collaborative web search , 2006, Information Retrieval.

[55]  E. Yalow On Educational psychology: A cognitive view. , 1979 .

[56]  P. Chan,et al.  Personalized Web Search by Using Learned User Profiles in Re-ranking , 2008 .

[57]  Michael E. J. Masson,et al.  Cognitive Processes in Skimming Stories , 1982 .

[58]  Carlo Tasso,et al.  Users as Crawlers: Exploiting Metadata Embedded in Web Pages for User Profiling , 2014, UMAP Workshops.

[59]  Dorota Glowacka,et al.  Supporting exploratory search tasks with interactive user modeling , 2013, ASIST.

[60]  Fabio Gasparetti,et al.  Personalized Search on the World Wide Web , 2007, The Adaptive Web.

[61]  Min Liu,et al.  A Semantic Approach to Recommendation System Based on User Ontology and Spreading Activation Model , 2008, 2008 IFIP International Conference on Network and Parallel Computing.

[62]  DIMITRIOS PIERRAKOS,et al.  User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction , 1994, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[63]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Observing users, designing clarity: A case study on the user-centered design of a cross-language information retrieval system , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[64]  M. Just,et al.  The intensity dimension of thought: pupillometric indices of sentence processing. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[65]  Tim Halverson,et al.  Cleaning up systematic error in eye-tracking data by using required fixation locations , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[66]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  Information foraging in information access environments , 1995, CHI '95.

[67]  Wolfgang Wörndl,et al.  Active learning strategies for exploratory mobile recommender systems , 2014, CARR '14.