The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's Technology Spin-Off Companies

This paper explores the role of the business model in capturing value from early stage technology. A successful business model creates a heuristic logic that connects technical potential with the realization of economic value. The business model unlocks latent value from a technology, but its logic constrains the subsequent search for new, alternative models for other technologies later on--an implicit cognitive dimension overlooked in most discourse on the topic. We explore the intellectual roots of the concept, offer a working definition and show how the Xerox Corporation arose by employing an effective business model to commercialize a technology rejected by other leading companies of the day. We then show the long shadow that this model cast upon Xerox's later management of selected spin-off companies from Xerox PARC. Xerox evaluated the technical potential of these spin-offs through its own business model, while those spin-offs that became successful did so through evolving business models that came to differ substantially from that of Xerox. The search and learning for an effective business model in failed ventures, by contrast, were quite limited. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

[1]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[2]  Alfred Dupont Chandler,et al.  战略与结构 : 美国工商企业成长的若干篇章=strategy and structure : chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise , 1962 .

[3]  K. Andrews.  The Concept of Corporate Strategy , 1971 .

[4]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The structuring of organizations : a synthesis of the research , 1980 .

[5]  David J. Teece,et al.  Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm , 1982 .

[6]  Robert A. Burgelman.  A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm , 1983 .

[7]  Robert A. Burgelman.  A Model of the Interaction of Strategic Behavior, Corporate Context, and the Concept of Strategy , 1983 .

[8]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[9]  Robert A. Brugelman.  A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm: Administrative Science Quarterly , 1988 .

[10]  Douglas K. Smith,et al.  Fumbling the Future: How Xerox Invented, Then Ignored, the First Personal Computer , 1988 .

[11]  Xerography from the beginning , 1989 .

[12]  David Jones,et al.  Corporate strategy , 1989, Nature.

[13]  Carol Kennedy,et al.  Xerox charts a new strategic direction , 1989 .

[14]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[15]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[16]  D. L. Flarey.  When Giants Learn to Dance , 1991 .

[17]  George Strauss,et al.  Tracking the Giant Corporation@@@Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. , 1991 .

[18]  David T. Kearns,et al.  Prophets in the Dark: How Xerox Reinvented Itself and Beat Back the Japanese , 1992 .

[19]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[20]  Zenas Block,et al.  Corporate Venturing: Creating New Businesses Within the Firm , 1993 .

[21]  S. Winter,et al.  Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence , 1994 .

[22]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The rise and fall of strategic planning : reconceiving roles for planning, plans, planners , 1994 .

[23]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network , 1995 .

[24]  R. Rosenbloom,et al.  Engines of innovation : U.S. industrial research at the end of an era , 1996 .

[25]  Richard S. Rosenbloom,et al.  Managerial Commitments and Technological Change in the US Tire Industry , 1997 .

[26]  Jeffrey Katz.  Winning Through Innovation , 1997 .

[27]  B. Silverman.  Technological Resources and the Direction of Corporate Diversification: Toward an Integration of the Resource-Based View and Transaction Cost Economics , 1998 .

[28]  Xerox R&D Managers Learn to Build Business Value into Their Products , 1998 .

[29]  Michael A. Hiltzik,et al.  Dealers of Lightning: Xerox PARC and the Dawn of the Computer Age , 1999 .

[30]  Michael Lewis,et al.  The New New Thing: A Silicon Valley Story , 1999 .

[31]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Designing Corporate Ventures in the Shadow of Private Venture Capital , 2000 .

[32]  Urs von Burg.  Plumbers of the Internet: The Creation and Evolution of the LAN Industry , 2000, Enterprise & Society.

[33]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Internet Business Models and Strategies , 2000 .

[34]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Assembling the elephant: A review of empirical studies on the impact of technical change upon incumbent firms , 2001 .

[35]  The use of small units to generate and transfer knowledge within large firms , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[36]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Graceful Exits and Missed Opportunities: Xerox's Management of its Technology Spin-off Organizations , 2002, Business History Review.