Breakdowns in Implementing Models of Organization Change

Executive Overview Practice theories of implementing change are lagging behind process theories of organizational change and development. To address this gap, this paper examines common breakdowns in implementing four process models of organization change: teleology (planned change), life cycle (regulated change), dialectics (conflictive change), and evolution (competitive change). Change agents typically respond to these breakdowns by taking actions to correct people and organizational processes so they conform to their model of change. Although this strategy commands most of the attention in the literature, we argue that in many situations managers and scholars might do better if they reflected on and revised their mental model to fit the change journey that is unfolding in their organization.

[1]  T. Judge,et al.  Job attitudes. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  S. Greenberg,et al.  The Psychology of Everyday Things , 2012 .

[3]  K. Weick.  Reflections: Change Agents As Change Poets – On Reconnecting Flux and Hunches , 2011 .

[4]  C. Oswick,et al.  Change Management: The Road Ahead , 2011 .

[5]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al.  THE LASTING IMPRINT OF TEAMS: PROJECT TEAMS AND INTRA-ORGANIZATIONAL NETWORK FORMATION. , 2010 .

[6]  Monique Aubry,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Competence of Project Leaders: A Case Study from Two Polar Expeditions , 2010 .

[7]  Moshe Farjoun.  Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .

[8]  P. C. Nutt,et al.  Handbook on Decision Making , 2010, Intelligent Systems Reference Library.

[9]  George P. Huber,et al.  Cross-Understanding: Implications for Group Cognition and Performance , 2010 .

[10]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: IBM and Emerging Business Opportunities , 2009 .

[11]  W. Warner Burke,et al.  Organization change : a comprehensive reader , 2009 .

[12]  三嶋 博之.  The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[13]  Gerald F. Davis,et al.  Introduction: Social Movements in Organizations and Markets , 2008 .

[14]  J. Ford,et al.  Resistance to Change: The Rest of the Story , 2008 .

[15]  E. Mannix,et al.  The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: a close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  J. Ivery,et al.  Organizational Ecology , 2007 .

[17]  C. Bendersky.  Complementarities in Organizational Dispute Resolution Systems: How System Characteristics Affect Individuals' Conflict Experiences , 2007 .

[18]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[19]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Collective Action Model of Institutional Innovation , 2006 .

[20]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Attitudes to Externally Organising Knowledge Management Tasks: A Review, Reconsideration and Extension of the NIH Syndrome , 2006 .

[21]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Organizations evolving (2nd ed.). , 2006 .

[22]  Aaron C. T. Smith,et al.  Organizing forms in change management: The role of structures, processes and boundaries in a longitudinal case analysis , 2005 .

[23]  Corinne Bendersky,et al.  Organizational Dispute Resolution Systems: a Complementarities Model , 2003 .

[24]  Kristin Behfar,et al.  The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study , 2003 .

[25]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[26]  James M. Bloodgood,et al.  Why Decisions Fail: Avoiding the Blunders and Traps That Lead to Debacles , 2003 .

[27]  H. Rao,et al.  Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  INTRAGROUP CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS: A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE ON THE CONFLICT-OUTCOME RELATIONSHIP , 2003 .

[29]  Paul M. Hirsch,et al.  Social Movements, Field Frames, and Industry Emergence: A Cultural-Political Perspective , 2003 .

[30]  Philip Bromiley,et al.  Banking on commitment: Intended and unintended consequences of an organization's attempt to attenuate escalation of commitment , 2002 .

[31]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[32]  Q. Huy.  Time, Temporal Capability, and Planned Change , 2001 .

[33]  J. Ruiz Moreno.  [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[34]  S. Piderit.  Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence: A Multidimensional View of Attitudes Toward an Organizational Change , 2000 .

[35]  Raghu Garud,et al.  The innovation journey , 1999 .

[36]  Elisabeth S. Clemens and,et al.  POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONALISM: Explaining Durability and Change , 1999 .

[37]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Blind (but Not Unconditioned) Variation: Problems of Copying in Sociocultural Evolution , 1999 .

[38]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizational change and development. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[39]  J. Berry.  The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890-1925. Elisabeth S. Clemens , 1998 .

[40]  H. Greve.  Performance, Aspirations, and Risky Organizational Change , 1998 .

[41]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  Caveat Emptor: The Construction of Nonprofit Consumer Watchdog Organizations1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  E. Clemens,et al.  The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890-1925. , 1997 .

[43]  J. Shanteau,et al.  Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking, 3rd Ed. Diane F. Halpern. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1996. No. of pages 430. ISBN 0-8058-1493-0 (hardback). ISBN 0-8058-1494-9 (paperback). Also, 205 page workbook. , 1997 .

[44]  N. Fligstein,et al.  Social Skill and Institutional Theory , 1997 .

[45]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Escalation at the Credit Window: A Longitudinal Study of Bank Executives' Recognition and Write-Off of Problem Loans , 1997 .

[46]  John D. McCarthy,et al.  Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes – toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movements , 1996 .

[47]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory , 1996 .

[48]  D. Halpern.  Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[49]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[50]  W. Sewell.  A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[52]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research , 1991 .

[53]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Research on the management of innovation : the Minnesota studies , 1991 .

[54]  Charles L. Hulin,et al.  Adaptation, persistence, and commitment in organizations. , 1991 .

[55]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[56]  S. Floyd,et al.  The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance , 1990 .

[57]  K. Weick.  Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[58]  G. Carroll,et al.  Density Delay in the Evolution of Organizational Populations: A Model and Five Empirical Tests , 1989 .

[59]  M. Beer,et al.  Organization Change and Development , 1987 .

[60]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Expo 86: An Escalation Prototype. , 1986 .

[61]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[62]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1985 .

[63]  M. Bazerman,et al.  Escalation of commitment in individual and group decision making , 1984 .

[64]  R. Cialdini.  Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[65]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[66]  B. M. Staw.  The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action , 1981 .

[67]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Problem Solving, Planning, and Innovation. Part I. Test of the Program Planning Model , 1980 .

[68]  E. Rogers,et al.  Reinvention in the Innovation Process , 1980 .

[69]  E. Hippel.  Successful Industrial Products from Customer Ideas , 1978 .

[70]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[71]  T. G. Cummings,et al.  Organization development and change , 1975 .

[72]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[73]  W. Ashby,et al.  Every Good Regulator of a System Must Be a Model of That System , 1970 .

[74]  Robert Powell Clagett.  Receptivity to innovation - overcoming N.I.H. , 1967 .

[75]  G. Poggi,et al.  A Main Theme of Contemporary Sociological Analysis: Its Achievements and Limitations , 1965 .

[76]  D. Campbell.  Variation and Selective retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution , 1965 .

[77]  W. Starbuck,et al.  Level of aspiration. , 1963, Psychological review.

[78]  H. Helson.  Adaptation-level as a basis for a quantitative theory of frames of reference. , 1948, Psychological review.