Seeing the Axial Line: Evidence from Wayfinding Experiments

Space-geometric measures are proposed to explain the location of fixations during wayfinding. Results from an eye tracking study based on real-world stimuli are analysed; the gaze bias shows that attention is paid to structural elements in the built environment. Three space-geometric measures are used to explain the data: sky area, floor area and longest line of sight. Together with the finding that participants choose the more connected street, a relationship is proposed between the individual cognitive processes that occur during wayfinding, relative street connectivity measured through space syntactic techniques and the spatial geometry of the environment. The paper adopts an egocentric approach to gain a greater understanding on how individuals process the axial map.

[1]  Young Ook Kim.  Spatial configuration, spatial cognition and spatial behaviour : the role of architectural intelligibility in shaping spatial experience. , 1999 .

[2]  A. L. Yarbus,et al.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967, Springer US.

[3]  A. Turner,et al.  From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space , 2001 .

[4]  Nick Dalton,et al.  A simplified route choice model using the shortest angular path assumption , 2005 .

[5]  R. Dalton.  The Secret Is To Follow Your Nose , 2001 .

[6]  Beatrix Emo,et al.  Wayfinding and Spatial Configuration: evidencefrom street corners , 2012 .

[7]  B. Hillier,et al.  The Social Logic of Space , 1984 .

[8]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Network and Psychological Effects in Urban Movement , 2005, COSIT.

[9]  Simon J. Büchner,et al.  Gaze behaviour during space perception and spatial decision making , 2011, Psychological Research.

[10]  John Zacharias.  PATH CHOICE AND VISUAL STIMULI: SIGNS OF HUMAN ACTIVITY AND ARCHITECTURE , 2001 .

[11]  J. Peponis,et al.  Finding the Building in Wayfinding , 1990 .

[12]  Saif Haq.  Investigating the Syntax Line: Configurational Properties and Cognitive Correlates , 2003 .

[13]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. , 2002 .

[14]  Jan M. Wiener,et al.  From Space Syntax to Space Semantics: A Behaviorally and Perceptually Oriented Methodology for the Efficient Description of the Geometry and Topology of Environments , 2008 .

[15]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[16]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[18]  Young Ook Kim,et al.  Linking the Spatial Syntax of Cognitive Maps to the Spatial Syntax of the Environment , 2004 .

[19]  Ruth Alison Conroy-Dalton,et al.  Spatial navigation in immersive virtual environments , 2001 .

[20]  Ruth Dalton,et al.  Space syntax and spatial cognition , 2005 .

[21]  Jerry Weisman,et al.  Evaluating Architectural Legibility , 1981 .

[22]  Michael Batty,et al.  Exploring Isovist Fields: Space and Shape in Architectural and Urban Morphology , 2001 .

[23]  A. Siegel,et al.  The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. , 1975, Advances in child development and behavior.

[24]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Taxonomy of Human Wayfinding Tasks: A Knowledge-Based Approach , 2009, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[25]  Reginald G. Golledge,et al.  Path Selection and Route Preference in Human Navigation: A Progress Report , 1995, COSIT.

[26]  G. Casella,et al.  International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 2001 .

[27]  Nick Dalton,et al.  Fractional Configurational Analysis And a solution to the Manhattan problem , 2001 .

[28]  Mahbub Rashid,et al.  On the Description of Shape and Spatial Configuration inside Buildings: Convex Partitions and Their Local Properties , 1997 .

[29]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Cognitive mapping , 2018, Cognitive Mapping.

[30]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture , 1996 .

[31]  Ruth Dalton,et al.  Understanding Space: The Nascent Synthesis of Cognition and the Syntax of Spatial Morphologies , 2007 .

[32]  C. Zimring,et al.  Just Down The Road A Piece , 2003 .

[33]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Challenges in Multilevel Wayfinding: A Case Study with the Space Syntax Technique , 2012 .

[34]  Yong Jeong,et al.  Spatial cognition , 2004, Neurology.

[35]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Isovist Analysis Captures Properties of Space Relevant for Locomotion and Experience , 2007, Perception.

[36]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  From Isovists via Mental Representations to Behaviour: First Steps toward Closing the Causal Chain , 2007 .

[37]  Frank Harary,et al.  Graph Theory , 2016 .

[38]  M. Benedikt,et al.  To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields , 1979 .

[39]  Beatrix Emo,et al.  Wayfinding in Real Cities: Experiments at Street Corners , 2012, Spatial Cognition.

[40]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  What determines our navigational abilities? , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  S. H. Kim,et al.  On the Generation of Linear Representations of Spatial Configuration , 1998 .

[42]  A. Turner,et al.  The ingredients of an exosomatic cognitive map: isovists, agents and axial lines? , 2007 .

[43]  Wilfried Brauer,et al.  Spatial Cognition III , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.