Communication Accommodation Theory

Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT) is a general theoretical framework of both interpersonal and intergroup communication. It seeks to explain and predict why, when, and how people adjust their communicative behavior during social interaction, and what social consequences result from those adjustments. In this entry, a brief historical overview of CAT's development is first provided, and some of its basic concepts are introduced. Second, the different adjustment strategies that speakers may enact are explained, and objective and subjective measures of accommodation are distinguished. Third, the motivations underlying communicative adjustment are examined, and the ways in which they can be shaped by the sociohistorical context in which an interaction is embedded are discussed. Fourth, the social consequences of communicative adjustment (and nonadjustment) are explored, and some of the many factors that mediate and moderate people's evaluations of others’ behavior are discussed. Finally, previous CAT principles are refined and elaborated, and directions for future research are suggested. Keywords: accommodation; convergence; divergence; intergroup communication; interpersonal communication; language; overaccommodation; social identity; underaccommodation

[1]  Attribution Processes and Interpersonal Accommodation in a Bilingual Setting , 1976, Language and speech.

[2]  N. Coupland.  Accommodation at work: some phonological data and their implications , 1984 .

[3]  R. Bourhis.  Cross-cultural communication in Montreal: two field studies since Bill 101 , 1984 .

[4]  J. Platt,et al.  Speech convergence miscarried: an investigation into inappropriate accommodation strategies , 1984 .

[5]  H. Giles,et al.  Psycholinguistic and social psychological components of communication by and with the elderly , 1986 .

[6]  H. Giles,et al.  Ethnolinguistic identity theory: a social psychological approach to language maintenance , 1987 .

[7]  H. Giles,et al.  Accommodating the elderly: Invoking and extending a theory , 1988, Language in Society.

[8]  Richard Y. Bourhis.  Contexts of Accommodation: Organizational communication and accommodation: Toward some conceptual and empirical links , 1991 .

[9]  D. Rubin.  Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates' judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants , 1992 .

[10]  P. Noller,et al.  Perceptions of Overaccommodation Used by Nurses in Communication with the Elderly , 1993 .

[11]  C. Tredoux,et al.  The Role of Speech Accommodation and Crime Type in Attribution of Guilt , 1994 .

[12]  A. Ferguson,et al.  Intonation in partner accommodation for aphasia: a descriptive single case study. , 2002, Journal of communication disorders.

[13]  Robin L. Nabi,et al.  Law Enforcement Encounters: The Effects of Officer Accommodativeness and Crime Severity on Interpersonal Attributions are Mediated by Intergroup Sensitivity , 2008 .

[14]  H. Giles,et al.  Who You Tink You, Talkin Propah? Hawaiian Pidgin Demarginalised , 2008 .

[15]  H. Giles.  Accommodating Translational Research , 2008 .

[16]  Andrew E. Smith,et al.  Conversations Between Carers and People With Schizophrenia: A Qualitative Analysis Using Leximancer , 2010, Qualitative health research.

[17]  S. Baker,et al.  Communication Accommodation and Managing Musculoskeletal Disorders: Doctors' and Patients' Perspectives , 2011, Health communication.

[18]  Andrew E. Smith,et al.  Visualising Conversation Structure across Time: Insights into Effective Doctor-Patient Consultations , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  H. Giles,et al.  Investigating Stepparent-Stepchild Interactions: The Role of Communication Accommodation , 2013 .

[20]  D. Hewett,et al.  Trust, distrust and communication accommodation among hospital doctors , 2013 .

[21]  Jessica Gasiorek.  “I Was Impolite to Her Because That's How She Was to Me”: Perceptions of Motive and Young Adults' Communicative Responses to Underaccommodation , 2013 .