Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants

Abstract When plants are competing, larger individuals often obtain a disproportionate share of the contested resources and suppress the growth of their smaller neighbors, a phenomenon called size-asymmetric competition. We review what is known about the mechanisms that give rise to and modify the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants, and attempt to clarify some of the confusion in the literature on size asymmetry. We broadly distinguish between mechanisms determined primarily by characteristics of contested resource from those that are influenced by the growth and behavior of the plants themselves. To generate size asymmetric resource competition, a resource must be “pre-emptable.” Because of its directionality, light is the primary, but perhaps not the only, example of a pre-emptable resource. The available data suggest that competition for mineral nutrients is often size symmetric (i.e., contested resources are divided in proportion to competitor sizes), but the potential role of patchily and/or episodically supplied nutrients in causing size asymmetry is largely unexplored. Virtually nothing is known about the size symmetry of competition for water. Plasticity in morphology and physiology acts to reduce the degree of size asymmetry in competition. We argue that an allometric perspective on growth, allocation, resource uptake, and resource utilization can help us understand and quantify the mechanisms through which plants compete.

[1]  Tomasz Wyszomirski,et al.  Competitive Asymmetry Reduces Spatial Effects on Size-Structure Dynamics in Plant Populations , 1994 .

[2]  T. Miller,et al.  Local Density Variation may Mimic Effects of Asymmetric Competition on Plant Size Variability , 1989 .

[3]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Light spectral quality, phytochrome and plant competition. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  K. Rice Reproductive hierarchies in Erodium : effects of variation in plant density and rainfall distribution , 1990 .

[5]  M. Küppers,et al.  4 – Canopy Gaps: Competitive Light Interception and Economic Space Filling—A Matter of Whole-Plant Allocation , 1994 .

[6]  T. Hara Mode of Competition and Size‐structure Dynamics in Plant Communities , 1993 .

[7]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  Self-Thinning Exponent Correlated with Allometric Measures of Plant Geometry , 1987 .

[8]  J. Wilson,et al.  The effect of initial advantage on the course of plant competition , 1988 .

[9]  L. Lundqvist Growth and competition in partially cut sub-alpine Norway spruce forests in northern Sweden , 1994 .

[10]  Gordon A. Fox,et al.  Population dynamic consequences of competitive symmetry in annual plants , 1995 .

[11]  R. Callaway,et al.  Root Communication Mechanisms and Intracommunity Distributions of Two Mojave Desert Shrubs , 1992 .

[12]  T. Hara Effects of variation in individual growth on plant species coexistence , 1993 .

[13]  Gordon B. Bonan,et al.  Density Effects on the Size Structure of Annual Plant Populations: An Indication of Neighbourhood Competition , 1991 .

[14]  James F. Reynolds,et al.  The Effect of Neighbors on Root Distribution in a Creosotebush (Larrea Tridentata) Population , 1994 .

[15]  D. Rabinowitz,et al.  Factors Affecting Frequency Distributions of Plant Mass: The Absence of Dominance and Suppression in Competing Monocultures of Festuca Paradoxa , 1983 .

[16]  M. Caldwell,et al.  Competing root systems: morphology and models of absorption , 1986 .

[17]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  The occupation and fragmentation of space : consequences of neighbouring shoots , 1992 .

[18]  R. Koide,et al.  Size and reproductive inequality in mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal populations of Abutilon theophrasti. , 1995 .

[19]  Robert B. Jackson,et al.  PLANT COMPETITION UNDERGROUND , 1997 .

[20]  Kiyoshi Umeki,et al.  Effect of crown asymmetry on size-structure dynamics of plant populations , 1997 .

[21]  J. Coleman,et al.  A non-functional interpretation of a classical optimal-partitioning example , 1995 .

[22]  T. Hara,et al.  Variation in individual growth and the population structure of a woodland perennial herb, Paris tetraphylla. , 1994 .

[23]  J. P. Grime 1 – The Role of Plasticity in Exploiting Environmental Heterogeneity , 1994 .

[24]  W. Lauenroth,et al.  Root System Response of a Perennial Bunchgrass to Neighbourhood-Scale Soil Water Heterogeneity , 1994 .

[25]  C. Ballaré,et al.  Signaling among neighboring plants and the development of size inequalities in plant populations. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  DEBORAH RABINOWITZ,et al.  Bimodal distributions of seedling weight in relation to density of Festuca paradoxa Desv. , 1979, Nature.

[27]  S. Schwinning Decomposition Analysis of Competitive Symmetry and Size Structure Dynamics , 1996 .

[28]  D. Ehrhardt,et al.  Dominance and suppression, size-dependent growth and self-thinning in a natural Impatiens capensis population , 1987 .

[29]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Allometric relations and growth in Pinus taeda: the effect of elevated CO2, and changing N availability , 1996 .

[30]  M. Vilà,et al.  Effect of local competition on resprouting of Arbutus unedo after clipping , 1994 .

[31]  Ana L. Scopel,et al.  Far-Red Radiation Reflected from Adjacent Leaves: An Early Signal of Competition in Plant Canopies , 1990, Science.

[32]  Toshihiko Hara,et al.  Growth dynamics and size structure of shoots of Phragmites australis, a clonal plant , 1993 .

[33]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Size variability and competition in plant monocultures , 1986 .

[34]  D. Eissenstat,et al.  Seedling establishment near large plants: effects of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas on the intensity of plant competition , 1990 .

[35]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Growth Variation in a Naturally Established Population of Pinus Sylvestris , 1994 .

[36]  M. Westoby Frequency Distributions of Plant Size during Competitive Growth of Stands: the Operation of Distribution-modifying Functions , 1982 .

[37]  J. Cahill,et al.  Limited effects of soil nutrient heterogeneity on populations of Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae) , 1996 .

[38]  R. Callaway,et al.  Root communication among desert shrubs. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  S. Pacala,et al.  Effects of competitive asymmetry on a local density model of plant interference. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  J. Coleman,et al.  Plasticity in Root/Shoot Partitioning: Optimal, Ontogenetic, or Both? , 1996 .

[41]  G. Berntson,et al.  Competition and growth form in a woodland annual , 1990 .

[42]  M. Geber Interplay of Morphology and Development on Size Inequality: A Polygonum Greenhouse Study , 1989 .

[43]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Effects of plant size on photosynthesis and water relations in the desert shrub Prosopis glandulosa (Fabaceae) , 1996 .

[44]  F. Bazzaz Habitat Selection in Plants , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[45]  D. Samson,et al.  Size-Dependent Effects in the Analysis of Reproductive Effort in Plants , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[46]  C. Ballaré,et al.  Phytochrome signalling in plant canopies: testing its population‐level implications with photoreceptor mutants of Arabidopsis , 1997 .

[47]  J. Weiner,et al.  The influence of competition on plant reproduction. , 1988 .

[48]  A. Makita Density regulation during the regeneration of two monocarpic bamboos: self‐thinning or intraclonal regulation? , 1996 .

[49]  Andrey B. Yastrebov,et al.  Different types of heterogeneity and plant competition in monospecific stands , 1996 .

[50]  F R Adler,et al.  A model of self-thinning through local competition. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  W. Lauenroth,et al.  Seedling Establishment in Adult Neighbourhoods--Intraspecific Constraints in the Regeneration of the Bunchgrass Bouteloua Gracilis , 1993 .

[52]  M. Gersani,et al.  Development correlations between roots in heterogeneous environments , 1992 .

[53]  N. Boardman Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. , 1977 .

[54]  M. Caldwell,et al.  Root growth responses of three Great Basin perennials to intra and interspecific contact with other roots , 1995 .

[55]  A. Biere Ecological significance of size variation within populations , 1987 .

[56]  A. Łomnicki,et al.  Regulation of population density due to individual differences and patchy environment , 1980 .

[57]  D. Tilman The Importance of the Mechanisms of Interspecific Competition , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[58]  J. P. Grime,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL PLASTICITY AND MINERAL NUTRIENT CAPTURE IN TWO HERBACEOUS SPECIES OF CONTRASTED ECOLOGY. , 1987, The New phytologist.

[59]  J. Terradas,et al.  Water relations, gas exchange and growth of dominant and suppressed shoots of Arbutus unedo L. , 1995, Tree physiology.

[60]  J. Weiner,et al.  Asymmetric competition in plant populations. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[61]  S. A. Barber Solute movement in the soil–root system , 1978, Nature.

[62]  Michael L. Cain,et al.  A Spatially Explicit Test of Foraging Behavior in a Clonal Plant , 1995 .

[63]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Symmetry of below-ground competition between Kochia scoparia individuals , 1997 .

[64]  C. Ballaré,et al.  3 – Light Gaps: Sensing the Light Opportunities in Highly Dynamic Canopy Environments , 1994 .

[65]  M. Begon,et al.  Competition and fitness , 1985 .

[66]  H. Kroon,et al.  Size hierarchies of shoots and clones in clonal herb monocultures: do clonal and non-clonal plants compete differently? , 1992 .

[67]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  How competition for light and nutrients affects size variability in Ipomoea tricolor populations , 1986 .

[68]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The Plant community as a working mechanism , 1982 .

[69]  A. Ellison Density‐Dependent Dynamics of Salicornia Europaea Monocultures , 1987 .

[70]  J. Harper,et al.  The influence of neighbours on the growth of trees. I. The demography of buds in Betula pendula , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[71]  J. Weiner,et al.  Competition and Allometry in Kochia scoparia , 1994 .

[72]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Size Hierarchies in Experimental Populations of Annual Plants , 1985 .

[73]  H. Kroon,et al.  Foraging in Plants: the Role of Morphological Plasticity in Resource Acquisition , 1994 .

[74]  T. Kohyama Size-Structured Multi-Species Model of Rain Forest Trees , 1992 .

[75]  G. Berntson Modelling root architecture: are there tradeoffs between efficiency and potential of resource acquisition? , 1994 .

[76]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Competition and Allometry in Three Species of Annual Plants , 1992 .

[77]  H. Mooney,et al.  Resource Limitation in Plants-An Economic Analogy , 1985 .

[78]  Miguel Franco,et al.  The Influences of Neighbours on the Growth of Modular Organisms with an Example from Trees , 1986 .