Study of trunk asymmetry in normal children and adolescents

The scoliometer readings in both standing and sitting position of 2071 children and adolescents (1099 boys and 972 girls) aged from 5 to 18 years old were studied. The angle of trunk rotation (ATR) was measured, in order to quantify the existing trunk asymmetry. Children and adolescents were divided in two groups according to the severity of trunk asymmetry. In the first group asymmetry was 1 to 6 degrees and in the second group was 7 or more degrees. Radiographic and leg length inequality evaluation were also performed in a number of children. The mean frequency of symmetric (ATR = 0 degrees) boys and girls was 67.06% and 65.01% for the standing screening position and 76.5% and 75.1% for the sitting position, respectively. The mean difference of frequency of asymmetry (ATR > 0 degrees) at standing minus sitting forward bending position for boys and girls was 10.22% and 9.37%, respectively. The mean frequency of asymmetry of 7 or more degrees was 3.23% for boys and 3.92% for girls at the standing forward bending position and 1.62% and 2.21% at the sitting, respectively. Girls are found to express higher frequency of asymmetry than boys. Right trunk asymmetry was more common than left. The sitting position is the preferred screening position for examining the rib or loin hump during school screening as it demonstrates the best correlation with the spinal deformity exposing the real trunk asymmetry.

[1]  J E Lonstein,et al.  Screening for spinal deformities in Minnesota schools. , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  J. Kenwright,et al.  The influence on the spine of leg-length discrepancy after femoral fracture. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  J. Moller,et al.  The case for scoliosis screening in Australian adolescents , 1986, The Medical journal of Australia.

[4]  S. Soinila,et al.  Reversible pelvic asymmetry: an overlooked syndrome manifesting as scoliosis, apparent leg-length difference, and neurologic symptoms. , 2006, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[5]  G RITCHIE,et al.  Hemangiomatosis of the skeleton and the spleen. , 1956, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  F. Cosco,et al.  The epidemiology of idiopathic scoliosis in the city of Bologna. A three-year review of positive cases. , 1990, La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento.

[7]  T. Grivas,et al.  The Double Rib Contour Sign (DRCS) in lateral spinal radiographs: aetiologic implications for scoliosis. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[8]  R. Dickson,et al.  The pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Biplanar spinal asymmetry. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  T. Grivas,et al.  Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. The Nottingham concept. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[10]  Stuart L. Weinstein,et al.  The Pediatric Spine: Principles and Practice , 2001 .

[11]  Kevin B. Jones,et al.  Leg-Length Discrepancy and Scoliosis in Marfan Syndrome , 2002, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[12]  Burke Gurney,et al.  Leg length discrepancy. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[13]  A. Schultz,et al.  Biomechanics of the Human Spine and Trunk , 1988, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[14]  M S Moreland,et al.  Spinal deformity and back surface asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[15]  W. P. Bunnell.  Outcome of Spinal Screening , 1993, Spine.

[16]  P. Soucacos,et al.  School-Screening for Scoliosis. A Prospective Epidemiological Study in Northwestern and Central Greece* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  S. Weinstein.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: prevalence and natural history. , 1989, Instructional course lectures.

[18]  M. Heliövaara,et al.  Development of trunk asymmetry in a cohort of children ages 11 to 22 years. , 2000, Spine.

[19]  A. Marsk.  Studies on weight-distribution upon the lower extremities in individuals working in a standing position: assessing the results of the measurements of load-pressure differences against the background of handedness and some clinical observations. , 1958, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[20]  A B Schultz,et al.  A model for studies of the deformable rib cage. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Jean Dansereau,et al.  Indices of torso asymmetry related to spinal deformity in scoliosis. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  P. Korovessis,et al.  Prediction of Scoliotic Cobb Angle With the Use of the Scoliometer , 1996, Spine.

[23]  J. Pruijs,et al.  School screening for scoliosis: methodologic considerations. Part 1: External measurements. , 1992, Spine.

[24]  R. Verdonk,et al.  Trunk Asymmetries in a Belgian School Population , 1982, Spine.

[25]  B. Ingelmark,et al.  Asymmetries of the lower extremities and pelvis and their relations to lumbar scoliosis. A radiographic study. , 1963, Acta morphologica Neerlando-Scandinavica.

[26]  W. P. Bunnell.  An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[27]  A. Alexopoulos,et al.  School screening for scoliosis in Athens. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  Neil Roberts,et al.  Research into Spinal Deformities 9 , 2021, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics.

[29]  R. Morrissy.  School screening for scoliosis. , 1999, Spine.

[30]  I Stokes,et al.  Scoliosis associated with limb-length inequality. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  J. K. Webb,et al.  Standardised trunk asymmetry scores. A study of back contour in healthy school children , 1983 .

[32]  T. Terjesen,et al.  [Anisomelia. Clinical consequences and treatment]. , 1997, Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening.