Repulsion or attraction? Group membership and assumed attitude similarity.

Three studies investigated group membership effects on similarity-attraction and dissimilarity-repulsion. Membership in an in-group versus out-group was expected to create initially different levels of assumed attitude similarity. In 3 studies, ratings made after participants learned about the target's attitudes were compared with initial attraction based only on knowing target's group membership. Group membership was based on political affiliation in Study 1 and on sexual orientation in Study 2. Study 3 crossed political affiliation with target's obnoxiousness. Attitude dissimilarity produced stronger repulsion effects for in-group than for out-group members in all studies. Attitude similarity produced greater increments in attraction for political out-group members but not for targets with a stigmatic sexual orientation or personality characteristic.

[1]  S. Duck,et al.  Understanding personal relationships : an interdisciplinary approach , 1985 .

[2]  C. Insko,et al.  Belief versus race as determinants of discrimination: A study of southern adolescents in 1966 and 1979. , 1981 .

[3]  Ramadhar Singh,et al.  Attitudes and attraction: A test of the similarity-attraction and dissimilarity-repulsion hypotheses. , 1992 .

[4]  Theodore M. Newcomb,et al.  The prediction of interpersonal attraction , 1956 .

[5]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  The role of the evaluation and similarity principles in the false consensus effect , 1984 .

[6]  David A. Wilder,et al.  Group Categorization and Attribution of Belief Similarity , 1979 .

[7]  Donn Byrne,et al.  The repulsion hypothesis revisited: Similarity irrelevance or dissimilarity bias? , 1989 .

[8]  Ramadhar Singh,et al.  Reinforcement and attraction specifying the effects of affective states , 1974 .

[9]  W. Crano,et al.  Inferred evaluation and the relation between attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction. , 1988 .

[10]  M. Brewer In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[11]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[12]  Margaret Thatcher,et al.  Downing Street years , 1993 .

[13]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Structure and direction in thinking , 1965 .

[14]  M. Lerner,et al.  Rejection as a consequence of perceived similarity. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[16]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Two Indirect Tactics of Image Management: Basking and Blasting , 1980 .

[17]  C. Insko,et al.  Belief congruence and racial discrimination: Review of the evidence and critical evaluation , 1983 .

[18]  Milton E. Rosenbaum,et al.  The repulsion hypothesis: On the nondevelopment of relationships. , 1986 .

[19]  M. Iverson,et al.  Social Expectancy as a Function of Judged Social Distance , 1958 .

[20]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration , 1992 .

[21]  G. Clore,et al.  The attraction hypothesis: do similar attitudes affect anything? , 1986 .

[22]  D. Byrne Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[23]  D. Mettee,et al.  When similarity breeds contempt. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  W. Griffitt,et al.  Environmental effects on interpersonal affective behavior: ambient effective temperature and attraction. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  G. Herek Heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences , 1988 .

[26]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[27]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  Attitude prototypes as determinants of attitude-behavior consistency. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  D. Byrne The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[29]  The Role of Self in the False Consensus Effect , 1995 .

[30]  M. Diehl Social identity and minimal groups: The effects of interpersonal and intergroup attitudinal similarity on intergroup discrimination , 1988 .

[31]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  V. A. Harris,et al.  The Attribution of Attitudes , 1967 .

[33]  G. Keppel Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook, 3rd ed. , 1991 .

[34]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[35]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[36]  A. Tesser,et al.  The Importance of Heritability in Psychological Research: The Case of Attitudes , 1993 .

[37]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[38]  M. Rokeach,et al.  The Open and Closed Mind , 1960 .

[39]  D. Byrne,et al.  ATTRACTION AS A LINEAR FUNCTION OF PROPORTION OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENTS. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Ramadhar Singh,et al.  Attitudes and Attraction: A Developmental Study of the Similarity-Attraction and Dissimilarity-Repulsion Hypotheses , 1995 .

[41]  Andrew J. DuBrin,et al.  6 – Small Group Behavior , 1977 .

[42]  Milton E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Comment on a proposed two-stage theory of relationship formation: first, repulsion. Then, attraction , 1986 .

[43]  G. Clore,et al.  Interpersonal attraction: the role of agreement and topic interest. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  D. Byrne,et al.  Racial prejudice, interpersonal attraction, and assumed dissimilarity of attitudes. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.