Exposure as Part of a Systems Approach for Assessing Risk

Background The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is facing large challenges in managing environmental chemicals with increasingly complex requirements for assessing risk that push the limits of our current approaches. To address some of these challenges, the National Research Council (NRC) developed a new vision for toxicity testing. Although the report focused only on toxicity testing, it recognized that exposure science will play a crucial role in a new risk-based framework. Objective In this commentary we expand on the important role of exposure science in a fully integrated system for risk assessment. We also elaborate on the exposure research needed to achieve this vision. Discussion Exposure science, when applied in an integrated systems approach for risk assessment, can be used to inform and prioritize toxicity testing, describe risks, and verify the outcomes of testing. Exposure research in several areas will be needed to achieve the NRC vision. For example, models are needed to screen chemicals based on exposure. Exposure, dose–response, and biological pathway models must be developed and linked. Advanced computational approaches are required for dose reconstruction. Monitoring methods are needed that easily measure exposure, internal dose, susceptibility, and biological outcome. Finally, population monitoring studies are needed to interpret toxicity test results in terms of real-world risk. Conclusion This commentary is a call for the exposure community to step up to the challenge by developing a predictive science with the knowledge and tools for moving into the 21st century.

[1]  Panos G Georgopoulos,et al.  Reconstructing population exposures to environmental chemicals from biomarkers: Challenges and opportunities , 2009, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[2]  Arnold Van Der Wielen,et al.  REACH: next step to a sound chemicals management , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[3]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  A flexible matrix algebra framework for the multimedia multipathway modeling of emission to impacts. , 2007, Environment international.

[4]  D. Mackay,et al.  Policies for chemical hazard and risk priority setting: can persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity, and quantity information be combined? , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  R A Becker,et al.  Biomonitoring equivalents: a screening approach for interpreting biomonitoring results from a public health risk perspective. , 2007, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[6]  William J. Jones,et al.  Performance, Reliability, and Improvement of a Tissue-Specific Metabolic Simulator , 2006 .

[7]  Ann M Richard,et al.  Chemical structure indexing of toxicity data on the internet: moving toward a flat world. , 2006, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[8]  Ann Richard,et al.  ACToR--Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource. , 2008, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[9]  R. Judson,et al.  The Toxicity Data Landscape for Environmental Chemicals , 2008, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  Simon Watkins,et al.  Personalized Exposure Assessment: Promising Approaches for Human Environmental Health Research , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  Chihae Yang,et al.  Toxicity Data Informatics: Supporting a New Paradigm for Toxicity Prediction , 2008, Toxicology mechanisms and methods.

[12]  Ann M Richard,et al.  Exposure science and the U.S. EPA National Center for Computational Toxicology , 2010, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[13]  Ursula Gundert-Remy,et al.  How can toxicogenomics inform risk assessment? , 2005, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[14]  P. Stolpman,et al.  Environmental Protection Agency , 2020, The Grants Register 2022.

[15]  Steven K. Gibb Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. , 2008, Reproductive toxicology.

[16]  D. Dix,et al.  The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[17]  Panos G Georgopoulos,et al.  From a Theoretical Framework of Human Exposure and Dose Assessment to Computational System Implementation: The Modeling ENvironment for TOtal Risk Studies (MENTOR) , 2006, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[18]  Harvey J Clewell,et al.  Reverse dosimetry: interpreting trihalomethanes biomonitoring data using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.