Multivariate Controller Performance Analysis : Methods , Applications and Challenges

This paper provides a tutorial introduction to the role of the time-delay or the interactor matrix in multivariate minimum variance control. Minimum variance control gives the lowest achievable output variance and thus serves as a useful benchmark for performance assessment. One of the major drawbacks of the multivariate minimum variance benchmark is the need for a priori knowledge of the multivariate time-delay matrix. A graphical method of multivariate performance assessment known as the Normalized Multivariate Impulse Response (NMIR), that does not require knowledge of the interactor, is proposed in this paper. The use of NMIR as a performance assessment tool is illustrated by application to two multivariate controllers. Two additional performance benchmarks are introduced as alternatives to the minimum variance benchmark, and their application is illustrated by a simulated example. A detailed performance evaluation of an industrial MPC controller is presented. The diagnosis steps in identifying the cause of poor performance, e.g. as due to model-plant mismatch, are illustrated on the same industrial case study.

[1]  Dale E. Seborg,et al.  Controller performance assessment based on setpoint response data , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[2]  Thomas J. Harris,et al.  Performance assessment measures for univariate feedforward/feedback control , 1993 .

[3]  Biao Huang,et al.  How Good is Your Controller? Application of Control Loop Performance Assessment Techniques to MIMO Processes , 1996 .

[4]  T. A. Badgwell,et al.  An Overview of Industrial Model Predictive Control Technology , 1997 .

[5]  R. K. Wood,et al.  Terminal composition control of a binary distillation column , 1973 .

[6]  Biao Huang,et al.  Multivariable model validation in the presence of time-variant disturbance dynamics , 2000 .

[7]  T. J. Harris,et al.  Performance assessment of multivariable feedback controllers , 1996, Autom..

[8]  Rohit S. Patwardhan,et al.  Studies in synthesis and analysis of model predictive controllers , 1999 .

[9]  David Q. Mayne,et al.  Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality , 2000, Autom..

[10]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Linear controller design: limits of performance , 1991 .

[11]  Sirish L. Shah,et al.  Good, bad or optimal? Performance assessment of multivariable processes , 1997, Autom..

[12]  Thomas F. Edgar,et al.  Performance assessment of multivariable feedback control systems , 2001, Autom..

[13]  T. Harris,et al.  Performance assessment measures for univariate feedback control , 1992 .

[14]  Sirish L. Shah,et al.  The unitary interactor matrix and its estimation using closed-loop data , 1997 .

[15]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  Diagnostic Tools for Multivariable Model-Based Control Systems , 1997 .

[16]  P. Bartlett,et al.  Signal-based testing of LQ-optimality of controllers , 1996, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[17]  Nina F. Thornhill,et al.  Refinery-wide control loop performance assessment , 1999 .

[18]  Huibert Kwakernaak,et al.  Linear Optimal Control Systems , 1972 .

[19]  Paul M. J. Van den Hof,et al.  Identification and control - Closed-loop issues , 1995, Autom..

[20]  Biao Huang,et al.  Performance Assessment of Control Loops , 1999 .

[21]  Sirish L. Shah,et al.  Issues in performance diagnostics of model-based controllers ☆ , 2002 .

[22]  J. Macgregor,et al.  Monitoring and Diagnosing Process Control Performance: The Single-Loop Case , 1991, 1991 American Control Conference.

[23]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Model predictive control: Theory and practice - A survey , 1989, Autom..

[24]  T. Harris Assessment of Control Loop Performance , 1989 .

[25]  Biao Huang,et al.  Feedback and Feedforward Performance Analysis of the Shell Industrial Closed Loop Data Set , 1997 .