Performance evaluation of shale gas processing and NGL recovery plant under uncertainty of the feed composition

Abstract The dramatic increase in discovering reserves of unconventional oil and gas wells has led to significant production of shale gas. It is predicted that by 2035, shale gas will be nearly half of the U.S. production of natural gas. One of the key challenges in processing shale gas is its varied flow rate and uncertain composition. The continual decrease in shale gas flowrate from a well can be managed by integrating supply of other wells and optimizing plant capacity. On the other hand, the composition of shale gas that differs from one well to another depending on the age and geological formation of the well is a natural phenomenon and hard to mitigate. Furthermore, prediction of the anticipated composition before production is uncertain. The uncertain variation in composition provides a challenge in the efficient design of a shale gas processing and natural gas liquids (NGLs) recovery plants. In this work, a stochastic approach is used for shale gas characterization and its impact on the performance of shale gas processing and NGL recovery units is addressed. The corresponding performance outcomes provide the distribution profile that is probabilistically characterized and design and performance targets that meets sustainability criteria (e.g. economic as well as environmental) are identified. A case study with three design capacities is solved to illustrate the value of the proposed approach. The analysis shows that the plant performance meets the minimum profitability criteria (ROI, %/year) only under specific feed composition and for a given plat capacity. The economic benefit as obtained from stochastic analysis is found to differ from that using the median value of the uncertain variables by ≅ 9.79%, suggesting limitations of traditional design approaches that do not account for uncertainty. The environmental performance is found to be insensitive to uncertainty.

[1]  Qiang Xu,et al.  Optimal design and operation for simultaneous shale gas NGL recovery and LNG re-gasification under uncertainties , 2014 .

[2]  M. El‐Halwagi,et al.  On the optimization of water-energy nexus in shale gas network under price uncertainties , 2020 .

[3]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Framework for Design Under Uncertainty Including Inherent Safety, Environmental Assessment, and Economic Performance of Chemical Processes , 2019, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.

[4]  Minbo Yang,et al.  A systematic simulation-based process intensification method for shale gas processing and NGLs recovery process systems under uncertain feedstock compositions , 2017, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[5]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Shale gas monetization – A review of downstream processing to chemicals and fuels , 2017 .

[6]  A. Kidnay,et al.  Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing , 2006 .

[7]  Salvador I. Pérez-Uresti,et al.  Techno-Economic Assessment of Benzene Production from Shale Gas , 2017 .

[8]  L. Peters,et al.  CO2 removal from natural gas by employing amine absorption and membrane technology—A technical and economical analysis , 2011 .

[9]  Keith A. Bullin,et al.  Compositional nal variety complicates processing plans for US shale gas , 2009 .

[10]  Subhas K. Sikdar,et al.  Parsimonious use of indicators for evaluating sustainability systems with multivariate statistical analyses , 2013, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[11]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Incorporation of Safety and Sustainability in Conceptual Design via a Return on Investment Metric , 2018 .

[12]  Palligarnai T. Vasudevan,et al.  How to Estimate Utility Costs , 2006 .

[13]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Reliability of C-H-O Symbiosis Networks under Source Streams Uncertainty , 2018 .

[14]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  A return on investment metric for incorporating sustainability in process integration and improvement projects , 2017, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[15]  Alireza Bahadori,et al.  Natural Gas Processing: Technology and Engineering Design , 2014 .

[16]  Nguyen Van Duc Long,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of potential natural gas liquid (NGL) recovery processes under variations of feed compositions , 2013 .

[17]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Alireza Bahadori,et al.  Risk-based optimization for representative natural gas liquid (NGL) recovery processes by considering uncertainty from the plant inlet , 2015 .

[20]  M. El‐Halwagi,et al.  Process Design and Integration of Shale Gas to Methanol , 2014 .

[21]  Ian J Laurenzi,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and freshwater consumption of Marcellus shale gas. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Subhas K. Sikdar,et al.  More on aggregating multiple indicators into a single index for sustainability analyses , 2012, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[23]  P. Schettler,et al.  Gas composition shifts in Devonian shales , 1989 .

[24]  M. El‐Halwagi,et al.  Optimal Selection of Shale Gas Processing and NGL Recovery Plant from Multiperiod Simulation , 2020 .

[25]  M. El‐Halwagi,et al.  Optimization of water-energy nexus in shale gas exploration: From production to transmission , 2019, Energy.

[26]  Subhas K. Sikdar,et al.  Measuring Progress Towards Sustainability: A Treatise for Engineers , 2017 .

[27]  Ali Elkamel,et al.  Simulation and optimization of natural gas processing and production network consisting of LNG, GTL, and methanol facilities , 2015 .

[28]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Design, simulation and techno-economic analysis of two processes for the conversion of shale gas to ethylene , 2017, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[29]  M. El‐Halwagi,et al.  Simultaneous Energy and Water Optimisation in Shale Exploration , 2018, Processes.

[30]  M. Ahmadi,et al.  Uncertainty quantification in heterogeneous tight/shale reservoirs from analysis of transient/boundary-dominated production data , 2020, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering.

[31]  Urmila M. Diwekar,et al.  Comparison of Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo technique in structure and relaxing dynamics of polymer in dilute solution , 2016, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[32]  A. Kidnay,et al.  Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing, Second Edition , 2011 .

[33]  W. A. Poe,et al.  Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing , 2006 .

[34]  Subhas K. Sikdar,et al.  Sustainability in the context of process engineering , 2015, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[35]  M. El‐Halwagi,et al.  Using integrated process and microeconomic analyses to enable effective environmental policy for shale gas in the USA , 2017, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[36]  Paul Stevens,et al.  The 'Shale Gas Revolution': Developments and Changes , 2012 .