Supersizing e-learning: What a CoI survey reveals about teaching presence in a large online class

Abstract The answer to massification in higher education lies not in paper-behind-glass style e-learning. Such courses lack the necessary interaction to ensure success. There are perceived upper limits to where e-learning can be up scaled to accommodate large classes. The Community of Inquiry framework provides a convenient instrument to assess the quality of teaching in an online course. All three of teaching, social and cognitive presences should be at an acceptable level to maintain successful learning. We report on a super-sized class for post-graduate students who received instruction over a distance employing a learning management system and email for communication. By using available functionalities in innovative ways, the one full-time lecturer ensured student engagement. Participating in double-blind electronic peer review brought a deeper dimension of learning to the class and augmented the teaching, cognitive and social presences in the class.

[1]  Frank H. Heppner.  Teaching the Large College Class: A Guidebook for Instructors with Multitudes , 2007 .

[2]  Edward F. Gehringer,et al.  Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses , 2001, SIGCSE '01.

[3]  Börje Holmberg,et al.  Key Issues in Distance Education: an academic viewpoint , 1989 .

[4]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[5]  Gwyneth Hughes,et al.  Using blended learning to increase learner support and improve retention , 2007 .

[6]  Donnie Kirk,et al.  Facilitating Online Learning: Effective Strategies for Moderators , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online , 2003 .

[8]  Stanley R. Trollip,et al.  Between a rock and a hard place: Faculty participation in online Classrooms , 2005 .

[9]  Lawrence A. Tomei.  The Impact of Online Teaching on Faculty Load: Computing the Ideal Class Size for Online Courses , 2006 .

[10]  Michael Feldstein,et al.  Unbolting the chairs: making learning management systems more flexible , 2006, ELERN.

[11]  Jennifer P. Bott,et al.  Inexperienced Versus Experienced Students' Expectations For Active Learning in Large Classes , 2007 .

[12]  Diana Battersby,et al.  Learning together online , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[13]  Christopher M. Johnson,et al.  Communities of Practice , 2001 .

[14]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Contextual Factors That Influence ALN Effectiveness , 2004 .

[15]  David Boud,et al.  Enhancing learning through self assessment , 1995 .

[16]  Charles Juwah,et al.  Using Peer Assessment To Develop Skills and Capabilities. , 2003 .

[17]  D. Boud,et al.  Peer Learning and Assessment , 1999 .

[18]  D. Gash.  E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online , 2012 .

[19]  Dianne Conrad,et al.  Building and Maintaining Community in Cohort-Based Online Learning , 2005 .

[20]  Anymir Orellana,et al.  CLASS SIZE AND INTERACTION IN ONLINE COURSES , 2006 .

[21]  Karen Swan,et al.  Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[22]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  Feelings of alienation and community among higher education students in a virtual classroom , 2005, Internet High. Educ..

[23]  J. D. Baker.  An investigation of relationships among instructor immediacy and affective and cognitive learning in the online classroom , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[24]  Karen Swan,et al.  Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses , 2001 .

[25]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2004 .

[26]  K. Topping.  Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities , 1998 .

[27]  Seugnet Blignaut,et al.  Developing a taxonomy of faculty participation in asynchronous learning environments - an exploratory investigation , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Karen Swan,et al.  Validating a Measurement Tool of Presen ce in Online Communities of Inquiry , 2008 .

[29]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[30]  Karen Swan,et al.  Course Design Factors Influencing the Success of Online Learning , 2000, WebNet.

[31]  Stanislav Kurkovsky,et al.  Using asynchronous discussions to enhance student participation in CS courses , 2005, SIGCSE '05.

[32]  Jim Hewitt,et al.  The relationship between class size and online activity patterns in asynchronous computer conferencing environments , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Paul O’Connell,et al.  ‘Going the extra mile’, ‘fire-fighting’, or laissez-faire? Re-evaluating personal tutoring relationships within mass higher education1 , 2008 .