Interactions with Combined Chemical Cues Inform Harvester Ant Foragers' Decisions to Leave the Nest in Search of Food

Social insect colonies operate without central control or any global assessment of what needs to be done by workers. Colony organization arises from the responses of individuals to local cues. Red harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex barbatus) regulate foraging using interactions between returning and outgoing foragers. The rate at which foragers return with seeds, a measure of food availability, sets the rate at which outgoing foragers leave the nest on foraging trips. We used mimics to test whether outgoing foragers inside the nest respond to the odor of food, oleic acid, the odor of the forager itself, cuticular hydrocarbons, or a combination of both with increased foraging activity. We compared foraging activity, the rate at which foragers passed a line on a trail, before and after the addition of mimics. The combination of both odors, those of food and of foragers, is required to stimulate foraging. The addition of blank mimics, mimics coated with food odor alone, or mimics coated with forager odor alone did not increase foraging activity. We compared the rates at which foragers inside the nest interacted with other ants, blank mimics, and mimics coated with a combination of food and forager odor. Foragers inside the nest interacted more with mimics coated with combined forager/seed odors than with blank mimics, and these interactions had the same effect as those with other foragers. Outgoing foragers inside the nest entrance are stimulated to leave the nest in search of food by interacting with foragers returning with seeds. By using the combined odors of forager cuticular hydrocarbons and of seeds, the colony captures precise information, on the timescale of seconds, about the current availability of food.

[1]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Forager activation and food availability in harvester ants , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Adam Guetz,et al.  Colony variation in the collective regulation of foraging by harvester ants. , 2011, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[3]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The development of an ant colony's foraging range , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Founding, foraging, and fighting: colony size and the spatial distribution of harvester ant nests , 1996 .

[5]  L. Copeland,et al.  The Chemistry of Seeds , 2001 .

[6]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Harvester Ants Utilize Cuticular Hydrocarbons in Nestmate Recognition , 2000, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[7]  C. Grüter,et al.  Informational conflicts created by the waggle dance , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  E. Vioque,et al.  Fatty acid composition of seed oil triglycerides inCoincya (Brassicaceae) , 1993 .

[9]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published January 22, 2007 Behavioral Ecology , 2022 .

[10]  R. Jander,et al.  Topochemical learning in black carpenter ants (Camponotus pennsylvanicus) , 2003, Insectes Sociaux.

[11]  W. Kanchanamayoon Determination of Some Fatty Acids in Local Plant Seeds , 2007 .

[12]  D. Gordon The Regulation of Foraging Activity in Red Harvester Ant Colonies , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[13]  N. I. Durlach,et al.  Chemical Releaser of Necrophoric Behavior in Ants , 1958 .

[14]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Control without hierarchy , 2007, Nature.

[15]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Behavioral Flexibility and the Foraging Ecology of Seed-Eating Ants , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The short-term regulation of foraging in harvester ants , 2008 .

[17]  S. Dussert,et al.  Development of solid-phase extraction and methylation procedures to analyse free fatty acids in lipid-rich seeds. , 2007, Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB.

[18]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Dependence of necrophoric response to oleic acid on social context in the ant,Pogonomyrmex badius , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[19]  A. Lenoir,et al.  Hydrocarbons detection levels in ants , 2010, Insectes Sociaux.

[20]  S. O’Donnell Worker biting interactions and task performance in a swarm-founding eusocial wasp (Polybia occidentalis, Hymenoptera: Vespidae) , 2001 .

[21]  D. Gordon The spatial scale of seed collection by harvester ants , 1993, Oecologia.

[22]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Task-Related Differences in the Cuticular Hydrocarbon Composition of Harvester Ants, Pogonomyrmex barbatus , 1998, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[23]  Deborah M Gordon,et al.  How Patrollers Set Foraging Direction in Harvester Ants , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[24]  Jacobus C. Biesmeijer,et al.  The role of internal and external information in foraging decisions of Melipona workers (Hymenoptera: Meliponinae) , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[25]  M. Bollazzi,et al.  Information Needs at the Beginning of Foraging: Grass-Cutting Ants Trade Off Load Size for a Faster Return to the Nest , 2011, PloS one.

[26]  D. Gordon,et al.  Social insects: Cuticular hydrocarbons inform task decisions , 2003, Nature.

[27]  X. Cerdá,et al.  Geographic variations in seed dispersal by ants: are plant and seed traits decisive? , 2007, Naturwissenschaften.

[28]  R. Hamilton Waxes : chemistry, molecular biology and functions , 1995 .

[29]  Scott Camazine,et al.  The regulation of pollen foraging by honey bees: how foragers assess the colony's need for pollen , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  S. Martin,et al.  Long-term stability of hornet cuticular hydrocarbons facilitates chemotaxonomy using museum specimens , 2009 .

[31]  Miller B. McDonald,et al.  Principles of Seed Science and Technology , 1999, Springer US.

[32]  D. Gordon,et al.  Optimization, Conflict, and Nonoverlapping Foraging Ranges in Ants , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[33]  Markus Knaden,et al.  Smells like home: Desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis, use olfactory landmarks to pinpoint the nest , 2009, Frontiers in Zoology.

[34]  Deborah M Gordon,et al.  Structural complexity of chemical recognition cues affects the perception of group membership in the ants Linephithema humile and Aphaenogaster cockerelli , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[35]  X. Cerdá,et al.  Detecting Nestmate Recognition Patterns in the Fission-Performing Ant Aphaenogaster senilis: A Comparison of Different Indices , 2005, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[36]  W. Farina,et al.  Reward rate and forager activation in honeybees: recruiting mechanisms and temporal distribution of arrivals , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[37]  M. Tissot,et al.  Novel wax esters and hydrocarbons in the cuticular surface lipids of the red harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex barbatus. , 2001, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology.

[38]  D. Gordon,et al.  Hydrocarbons on Harvester Ant (Pogonomyrmex barbatus) Middens Guide Foragers to the Nest , 2011, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[39]  Serban Nacu,et al.  How site fidelity leads to individual differences in the foraging activity of harvester ants , 2009 .

[40]  X. Cerdá,et al.  Geographic variations in Helleborus foetidus elaiosome lipid composition: implications for dispersal by ants , 2006, CHEMOECOLOGY.

[41]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The effect of individual variation on the structure and function of interaction networks in harvester ants , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.