PET-CT fusion in radiation management of patients with anorectal tumors.

PURPOSE To compare computed tomography (CT) with positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT) scans with respect to anorectal tumor volumes, correlation in overlap, and influence on radiation treatment fields and patient care. PATIENTS AND METHODS From March to November 2003, 20 patients with rectal cancer and 3 patients with anal cancer were treated with preoperative or definitive chemoradiation, respectively. Computed tomography simulation data generated a CT gross tumor volume (CT-GTV) and CT planning target volume (CT-PTV) and (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose PET (FDG-PET) created a PET-GTV and PET-PTV. The PET-CT and CT images were fused using manual coregistration. Patients were treated with three-dimensional conformal therapy to traditional doses. The PET, CT, and overlap volumes (OVs) were measured in cubic centimeters. RESULTS Mean PET-GTV was smaller than the mean CT-GTV (91.7 vs. 99.6 cm(3)). The mean OV was 46.7%. As tumor volume increased, PET and CT OV correlated significantly (p < 0.001). In 17% of patients PET-CT altered the PTV, and in 26% it changed the radiation treatment plan. For 25% of patients with rectal cancer, PET detected distant metastases and changed overall management. Ten rectal cancer patients underwent surgery. When the pretreatment PET standardized uptake value was >10 and the posttreatment PET standardized uptake value was <6, 100% achieved pathologic downstaging (p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS Variation in volume was significant, with 17% and 26% of patients requiring a change in treatment fields and patient management, respectively. Positron emission tomography can change the management for anorectal tumors by early detection of metastatic disease or disease outside standard radiation fields.

[1]  R. Wahl,et al.  Direct Comparison of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma , 2003 .

[2]  J. Zuger,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography for Pretreatment Staging and Posttreatment Evaluation in Cancer of the Anal Canal , 2005, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[3]  M. Blaufox,et al.  A metaanalysis of 18F‐2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoro‐D‐glucose positron emission tomography in the staging and restaging of patients with lymphoma , 2005, Cancer.

[4]  John L. Humm,et al.  Radiotherapy treatment planning for patients with non-small cell lung cancer using positron emission tomography (PET). , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  W. Martin,et al.  PET and PET-CT for evaluation of colorectal carcinoma. , 2004, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[6]  F. Gherlinzoni,et al.  The role of positron emission tomography (PET) in the management of lymphoma patients. , 1999, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Radiation treatment planning with an integrated positron emission and computer tomography (PET/CT): a feasibility study. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Otakar Belohlavek,et al.  Routine 18F-FDG PET Preoperative Staging of Colorectal Cancer: Comparison with Conventional Staging and Its Impact on Treatment Decision Making , 2003 .

[9]  Joel Karp,et al.  Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  P. Grigsby,et al.  FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of anal carcinoma. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  R. Blum,et al.  Integrated PET-CT: evidence-based review of oncology indications. , 2005, Oncology.

[12]  Peter A S Johnstone,et al.  FDG-PET in radiotherapy treatment planning: Pandora's box? , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  David Schuster,et al.  Comparison of CT- and FDG-PET-defined gross tumor volume in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Impact of FDG-PET on radiation therapy volume delineation in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.