A conceptual study on generic end users adoption of e-government services

This study proposes a conceptual model for examining factors affecting e-government adoption in developing countries. It includes evaluating the existing adoption model studies of e-government adoption. Preexisting theoretical model and comprehensive analysis of the various resources was chosen to guide this work, and the result revealed that additional external factors were also important for explaining the e-government adoption in developing countries. Hence, external factors such as trust, national culture, knowledge of e-government services and DeLone and McLean information system (D&M IS) success model also considered relevant were integrated with the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) constructs as examining factors affecting e-government adoption. Finally, this study finds a formulation of the conceptual model and their relationship with all variables for explaining e-government adoption through a systematic justification of the proposed integrated model.

[1]  Alireza Hassanzadeh,et al.  Factors affecting university instructors' adoption of web-based learning systems: Case study of Iran , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Li Jiang,et al.  Trust and Electronic Government Success: An Empirical Study , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  M. Oivo,et al.  Factors affecting e‐government adoption in Pakistan: a citizen's perspective , 2013 .

[4]  Tutut Herawan,et al.  Mining Significant Association Rules from on Information and System Quality of Indonesian E-Government Dataset , 2016, SCDM.

[5]  Changfeng Zhou,et al.  A citizen trust model for e-government , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Sciences.

[6]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[7]  Anastasia Voutinioti,et al.  Determinants of User Adoption of e-Government Services in Greece and the Role of Citizen Service Centres , 2013 .

[8]  Rozilawati Razali,et al.  An Empirical Study of Information Security Management Success Factors , 2016 .

[9]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[10]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  What Drives Global E-Governance? An Exploratory Study at a Macro Level , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  Cheryl R. Every‐Wurtz.  Online Readings in Psychology and Culture , 2009 .

[13]  Yair Levy,et al.  The Effect of Information Quality on Trust in E-Government Systems , 2012, AMCIS.

[14]  Min-Shiang Hwang,et al.  Challenges in E-Government and Security of Information , 2004 .

[15]  M. J. Moon.  The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[16]  L AndresenJ.  How to select an IT evaluation method - in the context of construction , 2002 .

[17]  Francesco Virili,et al.  Value generation in e‐government from service‐based IT integration , 2009 .

[18]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  A strategic perspective of electronic democracy , 2001, CACM.

[19]  Gino Verleye,et al.  User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[20]  Thea van der Geest,et al.  A cue or two and I'll trust you: Determinants of trust in government organizations in terms of their processing and usage of citizens' personal information disclosed online , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[21]  Mohd Farhan Md Fudzee,et al.  The Critical Factors Affecting e-Government Adoption in Indonesia: A Conceptual Framework , 2017 .

[22]  Parmita Saha,et al.  Evaluation of government e‐tax websites: an information quality and system quality approach , 2012 .

[23]  Jan van Dijk,et al.  Explaining the acceptance and use of government Internet services: A multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in the Netherlands , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Vincent Homburg,et al.  Persuasive Pressures in the Adoption of E-Government , 2013, TDIT.

[25]  D. McNabb,et al.  Knowledge management in the public sector: a blueprint for innovation in government , 2006 .

[26]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict , 2006, MIS Q..

[27]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Factors affecting citizen adoption of transactional electronic government , 2014, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[28]  David C. Yen,et al.  The research on the critical success factors of knowledge management and classification framework project in the Executive Yuan of Taiwan Government , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  M. Yusof,et al.  Dominant success factors for Knowledge Management in academic institution , 2011 .

[30]  Saad T. Alharbi,et al.  Trust and Acceptance of Cloud Computing: A Revised UTAUT Model , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence.

[31]  Z. Fang.  E-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice, and Development , 2002 .

[32]  Muriati Mukhtar,et al.  The Impact of Percieved Usefulness, Ease of Use and Trust on Managers’ Acceptance of e-Commerce Services in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in Palestine , 2016 .

[33]  Marie Christine Roy,et al.  Factors influencing e-government use in non-urban areas , 2015, Electronic Commerce Research.

[34]  J. C. Thomas,et al.  The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government , 2003 .

[35]  Hala AlKhatib,et al.  e-Government Systems Success and User Acceptance in Developing Countries: The Role of Perceived Support Quality , 2019, Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems.

[36]  R. Baskerville.  Hofstede Never Studied Culture , 2003 .

[37]  Dimitris E. Charilas,et al.  Evaluation of the Impact and Adoption of E-government Services in the Balkans , 2010 .

[38]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Exploring the success factors of state website functionality: an empirical investigation , 2005, DG.O.

[39]  Ronald Maier,et al.  Knowledge management systems - information and communication technologies for knowledge management (3. ed.) , 2007 .

[40]  Mutaz M. Al-Debei,et al.  The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Guest editorial cultural issues and it management: past and present , 2003 .

[42]  J. Ramon Gil-Garcia,et al.  Towards a multidimensional model for evaluating electronic government: Proposing a more comprehensive and integrative perspective , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[43]  Zahir Irani,et al.  E-government implementation: A bird’s eye view of issues relating to costs, opportunities, benefits and risks , 2013, Information Systems Frontiers.

[44]  Matti Mäntymäki,et al.  Does E-government Trust in e-Commerce when Investigating Trust? A Review of Trust Literature in E-Commerce and e-government Domains , 2008, II3E.

[45]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  Frank Bannister,et al.  The great theory hunt: Does e-government really have a problem? , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[47]  Robert Goodwin,et al.  Towards a UTAUT-based Model for the Study of E-Government Citizen Acceptance in Saudi Arabia , 2012 .

[48]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Applying TAM across cultures: the need for caution , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Pin-Yu Chu,et al.  Exploring success factors for Taiwan's government electronic tendering system: behavioral perspectives from end users , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..

[50]  Bram Klievink,et al.  The Role of Intermediaries in Multi-Channel Service Delivery Strategies , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[51]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review , 2015, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[52]  G. Hofstede.  Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context , 2011 .

[53]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Determining the type of e-government use , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[54]  France Bélanger,et al.  Citizen adoption of electronic government initiatives , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[55]  Adamantia G. Pateli,et al.  The Influential Factors of M-Government's Adoption in the Developing Countries , 2013, MobiWIS.

[56]  Khaldoun Batiha,et al.  Measuring user satisfaction from e-Government services: Lessons from Jordan , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[57]  Iwan Tri Riyadi Yanto,et al.  An Application of Rough Set Theory for Clustering Performance Expectancy of Indonesian e-Government Dataset , 2016, SCDM.

[58]  Celene Navarrete,et al.  Trust in E-Government Transactional Services: A Study of Citizens' Perceptions in Mexico and the U.S. , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[59]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating e-government adoption: An empirical investigation , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[60]  Emad Abu-Shanab,et al.  Trust Dimensions and the Adoption of E-Government in Jordan , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Hum. Dev..

[61]  Deron Liang,et al.  Assessing citizen adoption of e-Government initiatives in Gambia: A validation of the technology acceptance model in information systems success , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[62]  Jongsu Lee,et al.  E-government adoption in ASEAN: the case of Cambodia , 2009, Internet Res..

[63]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e‐government at the municipal level * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[64]  Adela S. M. Lau.  Strategies to encourage the adoption of G2C e-government services in Hong Kong , 2004, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..