Approach Angle Affects Accuracy in Robotic Stereoelectroencephalography Lead Placement.

BACKGROUND One third of patients with epilepsy fail to gain optimal control using antiepileptic drugs. New advances in epilepsy surgery have reshaped some diagnostic and therapeutic modalities into less invasive approaches. To understand the cortical epileptogenic networks, stereoelectroencephalography uses depth electrodes as a tool for invasive intracranial monitoring. These electrodes are now being placed using a robot instead of the traditional Talairach stereotactic grid and frame with comparable accuracy and the advantage of shortened surgical time. Whereas accuracy is important for correct cortical sampling and surgical morbidity, the factors that play a role in the deviation of the electrode's trajectory are not yet understood. The aim of this study was to determine if the angle the planned trajectory makes with the skull impacts the final accuracy of placement. METHODS Twenty-five patients with 319 stereotactic trajectories were examined. Skew angle and accuracy measurements were computed based on preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans fused with trajectories planned using ROSA robot software. RESULTS Trajectories with a planned angle of >30° (oblique group) had significantly higher radial error (2.05 mm vs. 1.45 mm, P < 0.001) than trajectories with planned angles <30° (orthogonal group). CONCLUSIONS The ROSA robotic system is a powerful tool that increases the speed and efficiency of stereotactic neurosurgery. Care should be taken when planning trajectories to avoid high skew angles. If a high skew angle is unavoidable, care should be taken to ensure a larger margin of safety.

[1]  Gabriele Arnulfo,et al.  Stereoelectroencephalography: surgical methodology, safety, and stereotactic application accuracy in 500 procedures. , 2013, Neurosurgery.

[2]  Sylvain Rheims,et al.  Stereo electroencephalography–guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (SEEG‐guided RF‐TC) in drug‐resistant focal epilepsy: Results from a 10‐year experience , 2017, Epilepsia.

[3]  Jean-Pierre Daurès,et al.  The prevalence of epilepsy and pharmacoresistant epilepsy in adults: A population‐based study in a Western European country , 2008, Epilepsia.

[4]  Francesco Cardinale,et al.  Implantation of Stereoelectroencephalography Electrodes: A Systematic Review , 2016, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[5]  M. Sather,et al.  The comparative accuracy of the ROSA stereotactic robot across a wide range of clinical applications and registration techniques , 2018, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[6]  J D Norrie,et al.  Patterns of treatment response in newly diagnosed epilepsy , 2012, Neurology.

[7]  F. Cardinale Stereoelectroencephalography: Application Accuracy, Efficacy, and Safety. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[8]  P. Kwan,et al.  Early identification of refractory epilepsy. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Denys Fontaine,et al.  In vivo measurement of the frame-based application accuracy of the Neuromate neurosurgical robot. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  J M Fitzpatrick,et al.  The role of registration in accurate surgical guidance , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[11]  Sebastien Ourselin,et al.  Accuracy of intracranial electrode placement for stereoelectroencephalography: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2017, Epilepsia.

[12]  Jean Ciurea,et al.  A Personalized Stereotactic Fixture for Implantation of Depth Electrodes in Stereoelectroencephalography , 2014, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[13]  Patrick Toussaint,et al.  The Impact of the Reference Imaging Modality, Registration Method and Intraoperative Flat-Panel Computed Tomography on the Accuracy of the ROSA® Stereotactic Robot , 2014, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[14]  Pieter L. Kubben,et al.  Methodology, outcome, safety and in vivo accuracy in traditional frame-based stereoelectroencephalography , 2017, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[15]  W. Eisner,et al.  Frame-Based vs Frameless Placement of Intrahippocampal Depth Electrodes in Patients With Refractory Epilepsy: A Comparative in Vivo (Application) Study , 2011, Neurosurgery.

[16]  Francesco Cardinale,et al.  SEEG, Happy Anniversary! , 2016, World Neurosurgery.

[17]  Patrick Kwan,et al.  Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Treated With Established and New Antiepileptic Drugs: A 30-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study , 2017, JAMA neurology.

[18]  Juan Bulacio,et al.  Technique, Results, and Complications Related to Robot-Assisted Stereoelectroencephalography. , 2016, Neurosurgery.

[19]  C. Mascott In vivo accuracy of image guidance performed using optical tracking and optimized registration. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery.

[20]  Volker Seifert,et al.  Robot‐guided stereoelectroencephalography without a computed tomography scan for referencing: Analysis of accuracy , 2018, CURAC.

[21]  Theodore H Schwartz,et al.  Frameless stereotactic placement of depth electrodes in epilepsy surgery. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[22]  J. C. Baayen,et al.  In Vivo Accuracy of a Frameless Stereotactic Drilling Technique for Diagnostic Biopsies and Stereoelectroencephalography Depth Electrodes. , 2016, World neurosurgery.