Existence of Critical Recovery and Impacts of Operational Mode on Potable Water Microfiltration

Results from a potable water microfiltration (MF) pilot study employing untreated surface water are reported. The effects of filtrate flux and recovery on direct flow, outside-inside, hollow fiber MF fouling rates, and backwash effectiveness are presented. Constant flux experiments suggested the existence of a critical recovery below which MF fouling rates were low and effectiveness of backwashes was high and relatively independent of the recovery. However, in the range of experimental conditions investigated, fouling rates increased dramatically and backwash effectiveness decreased steeply when this critical recovery was exceeded regardless of the flux. In general, for a fixed recovery, specific flux profiles analyzed on the basis of volume filtered per unit membrane area were insensitive to filtrate flux. Fouling was accelerated by operating membranes at constant flux rather than at constant pressure, in part, because of membrane compaction and cake compression. Changing the mode of filtration between constant flux and constant pressure is shown to have no effect on MF filtrate water quality. For any given capacity, membrane area requirements are decreased, and power requirements are increased when membranes are operated at constant flux rather than at constant pressure.

[1]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  Experimental verification of the shear-induced hydrodynamic diffusion model of crossflow microfiltration , 1991 .

[2]  G. Belfort,et al.  Cross‐flow membrane microfiltration of a bacteriol fermentation broth , 1989, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration , 1994 .

[4]  Nancy L. Patania,et al.  The occurrence of disinfection by-products in U , 1989 .

[5]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Cost Model for Low-Pressure Membrane Filtration , 1993 .

[6]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Particle back-transport and permeate flux behavior in crossflow membrane filters , 1997 .

[7]  J. Mallevialle,et al.  Effects of Humic Substances on Membrane Processes , 1988 .

[8]  M. Turker,et al.  MEMBRANE FOULING IN A CONSTANT-FLUX ULTRAFILTRATION CELL , 1987 .

[9]  F. Tiller,et al.  Compressibility of Paniculate Structures in Relation to Thickening, Filtration, and Expression—A Review , 1987 .

[10]  Jérôme Rose,et al.  Physico-chemical study of fouling mechanisms of ultrafiltration membrane on Biwa lake (Japan) , 1997 .

[11]  Kenneth M Persson,et al.  Study of membrane compaction and its influence on ultrafiltration water permeability , 1995 .

[12]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  Cross‐flow microfiltration with high‐frequency reverse filtration , 1995 .

[13]  Victor G. J. Rodgers,et al.  Effect of transmembrane pressure pulsing on concentration polarization , 1992 .

[14]  R. Field,et al.  Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling , 1995 .

[15]  Haruhiko Ohya,et al.  Cross-flow filtration of yeast by microporous ceramic membrane with backwashing , 1988 .

[16]  Greg E. Wetterau,et al.  A dynamic model for predicting fouling effects during the ultrafiltration of a groundwater , 1996 .

[17]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Evaluation of crossflow filtration models based on shear-induced diffusion and particle adhesion: Complications induced by feed suspension polydispersivity , 1998 .

[18]  K. Nakanishi,et al.  ON THE SPECIFIC RESISTANCE OF CAKES OF MICROORGANISMS , 1987 .

[19]  Victor G. J. Rodgers,et al.  Significance of duration and amplitude in transmembrane pressure pulsed ultrafiltration of binary protein mixtures , 1996 .

[20]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Raw water characteristics and the selection of treatment configurations for particle removal , 1989 .

[21]  S. Chellam,et al.  Modeling and Experimental Verification of Pilot-Scale Hollow Fiber, Direct Flow Microfiltration with Periodic Backwashing , 1998 .