Factors influencing willingness to provide personal information for personalized recommendations

Abstract By reducing the trouble of searching and selecting the right information, recommendation systems help users obtain information efficiently. However, recommendation systems also raise concerns over privacy issues. This paper thus examined consumers’ intentions to provide personal information based on the dual calculus model which incorporates two interrelated trade-offs. An online survey targeting those who have experience using YouTube was conducted. Five distinct types of personal information (usage patterns, personal identifiers, biographical information, usage context, and feedback information) were selected based on an exploratory factor analysis. The results imply that perceived benefits, convenience, and vulnerability do not have significant effects on intention to disclose information. Perceived severity, however, had a significant negative effect on intention to disclose all types of information. Coping efficacy showed positive effects on willingness to disclose personal data except for feedback information. Self-efficacy, on the other hand, had a positive effect only on disclosing feedback information. This study expands the scope of discussion on personal information by reflecting the recent expansion of the collection and use of information for recommendation systems. It also sheds light on how to identify and handle each type of information differently.

[1]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  The Role of Push-Pull Technology in Privacy Calculus: The Case of Location-Based Services , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Dane K. Peterson,et al.  Privacy Policy Statements and Consumer Willingness to Provide Personal Information , 2006, J. Electron. Commer. Organ..

[4]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Health experience model of personal informatics: The case of a quantified self , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Jong-Ki Kim,et al.  A Study on Factors Influencing Privacy Decision Making on the Internet: Focus on Dual-Calculus Model , 2016 .

[6]  Hyung-Jin Woo,et al.  A Study on Factors Affecting the Intention to Use Personal Cloud Service: Focused on the Convergence Model of TAM and PMT , 2013 .

[7]  Hong Joo Lee,et al.  The Influence of Social Presence on Customer Intention to Reuse Online Recommender Systems: The Roles of Personalization and Product Type , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[8]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  Ambidextrous information search: linking personal and impersonal search routines with individual performance , 2014, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[9]  Ken Kwong-Kay Wong,et al.  Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using SmartPLS , 2013 .

[10]  Lior Rokach,et al.  Introduction to Recommender Systems Handbook , 2011, Recommender Systems Handbook.

[11]  Paul Benjamin Lowry,et al.  Information Disclosure on Mobile Devices: Re-Examining Privacy Calculus with Actual User Behavior , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Bamshad Mobasher,et al.  Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization , 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[13]  Sumeet Gupta,et al.  Disclosure Intention of Location-Related Information in Location-Based Social Network Services , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[14]  Shuk Ying Ho,et al.  Web Personalization as a Persuasion Strategy: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Vincenzo Russo,et al.  Privacy calculus model in e-commerce – a study of Italy and the United States , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  Li Chen,et al.  Evaluating recommender systems from the user’s perspective: survey of the state of the art , 2012, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[18]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1. , 1975, The Journal of psychology.

[20]  David Gefen,et al.  IT acceptance: managing user—IT group boundaries , 2003, DATB.

[21]  David Gefen,et al.  The impact of personal dispositions on information sensitivity, privacy concern and trust in disclosing health information online , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  H. Teo,et al.  Volunteering personal information on the internet: Effects of reputation, privacy notices, and rewards on online consumer behavior , 2004 .

[23]  Bart P. Knijnenburg,et al.  Explaining the user experience of recommender systems , 2012, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[24]  Dan Frankowski,et al.  Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems , 2007, The Adaptive Web.

[25]  R. Rogers Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of prote , 1983 .

[26]  Ting Li,et al.  Willing to pay for quality personalization? Trade-off between quality and privacy , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Pieter H. Hartel,et al.  Privacy in Recommender Systems , 2013, Social Media Retrieval.

[29]  J. Phelps,et al.  Privacy Concerns and Consumer Willingness to Provide Personal Information , 2000 .

[30]  Jun Heo,et al.  Visiting theories that predict college students' self-disclosure on Facebook , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Princely Ifinedo,et al.  Understanding information systems security policy compliance: An integration of the theory of planned behavior and the protection motivation theory , 2012, Comput. Secur..

[32]  Natasha F. Veltri,et al.  Privacy Calculus on Social Networking Sites: Explorative Evidence from Germany and USA , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[33]  Yuan Li,et al.  Theories in online information privacy research: A critical review and an integrated framework , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[34]  Hongxia Jin,et al.  Privacy Concerns in Online Recommender Systems: Influences of Control and User Data Input , 2014, SOUPS.

[35]  Rathindra Sarathy,et al.  Understanding Situational Online Information Disclosure as a Privacy Calculus , 2010, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  Making Decisions about Privacy: Information Disclosure in Context-Aware Recommender Systems , 2013, TIIS.