Unifying screening processes within the PROSPR consortium: a conceptual model for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.

General frameworks of the cancer screening process are available, but none directly compare the process in detail across different organ sites. This limits the ability of medical and public health professionals to develop and evaluate coordinated screening programs that apply resources and population management strategies available for one cancer site to other sites. We present a trans-organ conceptual model that incorporates a single screening episode for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers into a unified framework based on clinical guidelines and protocols; the model concepts could be expanded to other organ sites. The model covers four types of care in the screening process: risk assessment, detection, diagnosis, and treatment. Interfaces between different provider teams (eg, primary care and specialty care), including communication and transfer of responsibility, may occur when transitioning between types of care. Our model highlights across each organ site similarities and differences in steps, interfaces, and transitions in the screening process and documents the conclusion of a screening episode. This model was developed within the National Cancer Institute-funded consortium Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR). PROSPR aims to optimize the screening process for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer and includes seven research centers and a statistical coordinating center. Given current health care reform initiatives in the United States, this conceptual model can facilitate the development of comprehensive quality metrics for cancer screening and promote trans-organ comparative cancer screening research. PROSPR findings will support the design of interventions that improve screening outcomes across multiple cancer sites.

[1]  Ashokkumar A. Patel,et al.  The development of common data elements for a multi-institute prostate cancer tissue bank: The Cooperative Prostate Cancer Tissue Resource (CPCTR) experience , 2005, BMC Cancer.

[2]  M. Manos,et al.  A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening. , 2003, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[3]  D. Haggstrom,et al.  Systems Strategies to Support Cancer Screening in U.S. Primary Care Practice , 2011, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[4]  Amy Leader,et al.  Is the Promise of Cancer-Screening Programs Being Compromised? Quality of Follow-Up Care after Abnormal Screening Results , 2003, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[5]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[6]  Yingye Zheng,et al.  The Colorectal Cancer Screening Process in Community Settings: A Conceptual Model for the Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens Consortium , 2014, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[7]  L. Burhansstipanov,et al.  Assessing the impact of patient navigation , 2011, Cancer.

[8]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Using a Multifaceted Approach to Improve the Follow-Up of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Results , 2009, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[9]  Timothy J Wilt,et al.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.

[10]  S. Taplin,et al.  Multilevel factors affecting quality: examples from the cancer care continuum. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[11]  S. Taplin,et al.  Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[12]  M. Yaffe,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007 .

[13]  H. Nelson,et al.  Screening for Breast Cancer: An Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  M. Leavitt Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. , 2001, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[15]  D. Ransohoff,et al.  Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  S. Taplin,et al.  Interfaces across the cancer continuum offer opportunities to improve the process of care. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[17]  Rajiv Dhir,et al.  The development and deployment of Common Data Elements for tissue banks for translational research in cancer – An emerging standard based approach for the Mesothelioma Virtual Tissue Bank , 2008, BMC Cancer.

[18]  M. Phipps,et al.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. , 2016, JAMA.

[19]  Timothy J Wilt,et al.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.

[20]  A. Mariotto,et al.  Advancing comparative studies of patterns of care and economic outcomes in cancer: challenges and opportunities. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[21]  I. Wilson,et al.  A conceptual model of the effects of health care organizations on the quality of medical care. , 1998, JAMA.

[22]  D. Saslow,et al.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2014: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening , 2014, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[23]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  M. Katz,et al.  Barriers reported among patients with breast and cervical abnormalities in the patient navigation research program: impact on timely care. , 2014, Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health.

[26]  Evan R. Myers,et al.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology Screening Guidelines for the Prevention and Early Detection of Cervical Cancer , 2012, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[27]  Michael Pignone,et al.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Adults at Average Risk: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[28]  Susan J. Curry,et al.  Fulfilling the Potential of Cancer Prevention and Early Detection , 2003 .

[29]  K. Yabroff,et al.  Interventions to improve cancer screening: commentary from a health services research perspective. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[30]  L. Solberg,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening: health impact and cost effectiveness. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[31]  M. Gokhale,et al.  Predictors of timely follow‐up after abnormal cancer screening among women seeking care at urban community health centers , 2010, Cancer.

[32]  Carmen L. Lewis,et al.  Organizational Change: A Way to Increase Colon, Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practices , 2011, Journal of Community Health.

[33]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication , 2009, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[34]  Sharyl J. Nass,et al.  Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis , 2014 .

[35]  S. Taplin,et al.  Toward improving the quality of cancer care: addressing the interfaces of primary and oncology-related subspecialty care. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[36]  S. Taplin,et al.  Introduction: Understanding and influencing multilevel factors across the cancer care continuum. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[37]  P M Nadkarni,et al.  The Common Data Elements for Cancer Research: Remarks on Functions and Structure , 2006, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[38]  Diane Solomon,et al.  2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[39]  Shannon M. Lynch,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Biologic, Individual, and Macroenvironmental Factors in Cancer: A Multilevel Approach , 2013, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[40]  S. Taplin,et al.  A Multilevel Research Perspective on Cancer Care Delivery: The Example of Follow-Up to An Abnormal Mammogram , 2012, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[41]  M. Manos,et al.  Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[42]  Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk,et al.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.

[43]  V. Moyer,et al.  Screening for Cervical Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[44]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi‐Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology * † , 2008, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[45]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Reducing referral delays in colorectal cancer diagnosis: is it about how you ask? , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[46]  Heather Kincaid,et al.  Development of common data elements: the experience of and recommendations from the early detection research network , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[47]  Kevin W Lutz,et al.  Risk Factors and Other Epidemiologic Considerations for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Narrative Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[48]  M. Schiffman,et al.  2012 Updated Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors , 2013, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[49]  Shoshannah A. Pearlman The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , 2013, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association.

[50]  Rongwei Fu,et al.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Targeted, Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[51]  S. Taplin,et al.  Organizational factors and the cancer screening process. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[52]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. , 2012, Gastroenterology.

[53]  M. Manos,et al.  Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up? , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[54]  A. Kaluzny,et al.  Multilevel intervention research: lessons learned and pathways forward. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[55]  V. Benard,et al.  Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests screening interval recommendations in the United States. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[56]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Research paper: Provider management strategies of abnormal test result alerts: a cognitive task analysis , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[57]  A. Mariotto,et al.  Comparing cancer care, outcomes, and costs across health systems: charting the course. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[58]  E. Conant,et al.  Breast cancer screening in an era of personalized regimens: A conceptual model and National Cancer Institute initiative for risk‐based and preference‐based approaches at a population level , 2014, Cancer.