Novelty, stimulus control, and operant variability

Although behavior analysis has been criticized for failure to account for response novelty, many common behavior-analytic concepts and processes (e.g., selectionism, the operant, reinforcement, and stimulus control) assume variability both in the environment and in behavior. The importance of the relation between variability and novelty, particularly for verbal behavior, is discussed, and concepts used to account for novel behavior are examined. Experimental findings also are reviewed that suggest that variability in behavior can come under discriminative control, and these findings are applied to describe novel instances of behavior that may arise during problem solving. We conclude that variations provided and selected by the terms of the three-term contingency are powerful means for understanding novel behavior.

[1]  K. Pryor,et al.  The creative porpoise: training for novel behavior. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  B Lowenkron,et al.  Some logical functions of joint control. , 1998, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  B. Skinner Contingencies of reinforcement : a theoretical analysis , 1969 .

[4]  Edward A. Wasserman,et al.  Conceptual Behavior in Pigeons: Categorization of Both Familiar and Novel Examples From Four Classes of Natural and Artificial Stimuli , 1988 .

[5]  C F Lowe,et al.  On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. , 1996, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  H Weiner,et al.  Controlling human fixed-interval performance. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  P. N. Chase,et al.  Effects of response variability on the sensitivity of rule-governed behavior. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  H. Samson Initiation of ethanol reinforcement using a sucrose-substitution procedure in food- and water-sated rats. , 1986, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[9]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categories, subcategories, and pseudocategories. , 1988 .

[10]  R. J. Herrnstein,et al.  Levels of stimulus control: A functional approach , 1990, Cognition.

[11]  R. Lubow,et al.  High-order concept formation in the pigeon. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Complex Visual Concept in the Pigeon , 1964, Science.

[13]  D M Baer,et al.  An implicit technology of generalization. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[14]  D M Baer,et al.  Social control of form diversity and the emergence of new forms in children's blockbuilding. , 1973, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[15]  P N Chase,et al.  The relationship between stimulus equivalence and verbal behavior , 1991, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[16]  A. Machado Increasing the variability of response sequences in pigeons by adjusting the frequency of switching between two keys. , 1997, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  J. Staddon,et al.  The "supersitition" experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. , 1971 .

[18]  G. Alessi Generative strategies and teaching for generalization , 1987, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[19]  G. Galbicka Shaping in the 21st century: Moving percentile schedules into applied settings. , 1994, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[20]  A. Neuringer,et al.  Variability is an operant. , 1985 .

[21]  Ludwig Huber,et al.  Natural Categorization through Multiple Feature Learning in Pigeons , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[22]  M. Sidman,et al.  Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. , 2000, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[23]  B. Skinner Two Types of Conditioned Reflex: A Reply to Konorski and Miller , 1937 .

[24]  M. Sidman,et al.  Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[25]  B. Skinner,et al.  Science and human behavior , 1953 .

[26]  N. Guttman,et al.  Discriminability and stimulus generalization. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  J. J. Antonitis,et al.  Response variability in the white rat during conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Jeffrey S. Katz,et al.  Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes. , 1997 .

[29]  A. Charles Catania,et al.  The Taxonomy of Verbal Behavior , 1998 .

[30]  R. Epstein Resurgence of previously reinforced behavior during extinction. , 1983 .

[31]  J. Lamarre,et al.  The functional independence of mands and tacts. , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[32]  R J Herrnstein,et al.  Acquisition, generalization, and discrimination reversal of a natural concept. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[33]  I. Goldiamond,et al.  Contingency Adduction of “Symbolic Aggression” by Pigeons , 1997, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[34]  Noam Chomsky Review of B.F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior , 1959 .

[35]  M. Wakita,et al.  Pigeons' discrimination of paintings by Monet and Picasso. , 1995, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[36]  M. Sundberg,et al.  Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations , 1987, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[37]  W. Köhler The Mentality of Apes. , 2018, Nature.

[38]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Natural concepts in pigeons. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[39]  C. Johanson,et al.  Establishment of a diazepam preference in human volunteers following a differential-conditioning history of placebo versus diazepam choice. , 2002, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[40]  R. Epstein The spontaneous interconnection of four repertoires of behavior in a pigeon (Columba livia). , 1987, Journal of comparative psychology.

[41]  R. Epstein Extinction-Induced Resurgence: Preliminary Investigations And Possible Applications , 1985 .

[42]  W. N. Schoenfeld,et al.  Conditioning Response Variability , 1966, Psychological reports.

[43]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Can salient reward increase creative performance without reducing intrinsic creative interest? , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  H. Birch,et al.  The role of motivational factors in insightful problem-solving. , 1945, Journal of comparative psychology.

[45]  I. Maltzman,et al.  On the training of originality. , 1960, Psychological review.

[46]  P N Chase,et al.  The effects of a variety of instructions on human fixed-interval performance. , 1988, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[47]  B. Skinner The Generic Nature of the Concepts of Stimulus and Response , 1935 .

[48]  K. R. Johnson,et al.  Verbal relations within instruction: Are there subclasses of the intraverbal? , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[49]  David C. Palmer,et al.  Learning and Complex Behavior , 1993 .

[50]  A. Catania The concept of the operant in the analysis of behavior. , 1973 .

[51]  B. Skinner,et al.  Giving up the ghost , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[52]  R. Meisch,et al.  Oral Drug Self-Administration: Drugs as Reinforcers , 1987 .

[53]  K. Maccorquodale ON CHOMSKY'S REVIEW OF SKINNER'S VERBAL BEHAVIOR , 1970 .

[54]  Douglas Carnine,et al.  Theory of instruction : principles and applications , 1982 .