Influence Dynamics and Consensus in an Opinion-Neighborhood based Modified Vicsek-like Social Network

We propose a modified Vicsek-like model to study influence dynamics and opinion formation in social networks. We work on the premise that opinions of members of a group may be considered to be analogous to the direction of motion of a particle in space. The opinions are susceptible to change under the influence of familiar individuals who maintain similar beliefs. This is unlike the bounded-confidence models which solely rely on interactions based on closeness of opinions. The influence network evolves either when similar-minded individuals acquaint or when they fall out over their beliefs. This yields an adaptive network to which are assigned dynamic centrality scores and varying influence strengths. A mix of individuals - rigid and flexible - is assumed to constitute groups - liberal and conservative. We analyse emergent group behaviours subject to different initial conditions, agent types, their densities and tolerances. The model accurately predicts the role of rigid agents in hampering consensus. Also, a few structural properties of the dynamic network, which result as a consequence of the proposed model have been established.

[1]  Wen Yang,et al.  Consensus in a heterogeneous influence network. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Haili Liang,et al.  Opinion dynamics in networks with heterogeneous confidence and influence , 2013 .

[3]  J. French A formal theory of social power. , 1956, Psychology Review.

[4]  I. N. A. C. I. J. H. Fowler Book Review: Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. , 2009 .

[5]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[6]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Opinion Fluctuations and Disagreement in Social Networks , 2010, Math. Oper. Res..

[7]  D. Zanette,et al.  Opinion Formation by Social Influence: From Experiments to Modeling , 2015, PloS one.

[8]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Approaching consensus can be delicate when positions harden , 1986 .

[9]  Alexey S. Matveev,et al.  Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks With Hostile Camps: Consensus vs. Polarization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[10]  Pietro DeLellis,et al.  The evolving cobweb of relations among partially rational investors , 2017, PloS one.

[11]  Pietro DeLellis,et al.  Steering opinion dynamics via containment control , 2017, Computational social networks.

[12]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Jan Lorenz,et al.  Continuous Opinion Dynamics under Bounded Confidence: A Survey , 2007, 0707.1762.

[14]  Bernard Chazelle,et al.  The Convergence of Bird Flocking , 2009, JACM.

[15]  A. Barrat,et al.  Consensus formation on adaptive networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  A. Ozdaglar,et al.  Discrete Opinion Dynamics with Stubborn Agents , 2011 .

[17]  R. Srikant,et al.  Opinion dynamics in social networks with stubborn agents: Equilibrium and convergence rate , 2014, Autom..

[18]  Rodney Teo,et al.  Decentralized overlapping control of a formation of unmanned aerial vehicles , 2004, Autom..

[19]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Spread of (Mis)Information in Social Networks , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[20]  N. Boccara MODELS OF OPINION FORMATION: INFLUENCE OF OPINION LEADERS , 2007, 0704.1790.

[21]  C. Hauert,et al.  Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  E. Seneta,et al.  Towards consensus: some convergence theorems on repeated averaging , 1977, Journal of Applied Probability.

[23]  Alain Barrat,et al.  Who's talking first? Consensus or lack thereof in coevolving opinion formation models. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[24]  Susan K. Walker Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives , 2011 .

[25]  M. Stone The Opinion Pool , 1961 .

[26]  Hansjörg Neth,et al.  Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation , 2013, PloS one.

[27]  Mark Levene,et al.  Social Networks: An Introduction , 2010, Comput. J..

[28]  F. Amblard,et al.  The role of network topology on extremism propagation with the Relative Agreement opinion dynamics , 2004 .

[29]  M. Degroot Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[30]  E. Shaw The Schooling of Fishes , 1962 .

[31]  Jean-Philippe Bouchaud,et al.  Sudden trust collapse in networked societies , 2014, The European Physical Journal B.

[32]  Qipeng Liu,et al.  Opinion dynamics with similarity-based random neighbors , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[33]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Meet, discuss, and segregate! , 2002, Complex..

[34]  Shilpa Chakravartula,et al.  Complex Networks: Structure and Dynamics , 2014 .

[35]  Yi Peng,et al.  Multi-Level Opinion Dynamics under Bounded Confidence , 2012, PloS one.

[36]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[37]  G. Erard Weisbuch,et al.  Dynamical Aspects in the Adoption of Agri-environmental Measures , 2002 .

[38]  Niloy Ganguly,et al.  Learning a Linear Influence Model from Transient Opinion Dynamics , 2014, CIKM.

[39]  Maurizio Porfiri,et al.  Decline of minorities in stubborn societies , 2007 .

[40]  Claudio Altafini,et al.  Consensus Problems on Networks With Antagonistic Interactions , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[41]  Víctor M Eguíluz,et al.  Cooperation, social networks, and the emergence of leadership in a prisoner's dilemma with adaptive local interactions. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[42]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  H. Föllmer Random economies with many interacting agents , 1974 .

[44]  S. Galam Contrarian deterministic effects on opinion dynamics: “the hung elections scenario” , 2003, cond-mat/0307404.

[45]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Social influence and opinions , 1990 .

[46]  Maurizio Porfiri,et al.  Evolution of Complex Networks via Edge Snapping , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[47]  Petter Ögren,et al.  Cooperative control of mobile sensor networks:Adaptive gradient climbing in a distributed environment , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[48]  Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron,et al.  Opinion evolution in closed community , 2000, cond-mat/0101130.

[49]  Zhijun Li,et al.  Opinion dynamics of modified Hegselmann–Krause model in a group-based population with heterogeneous bounded confidence , 2015 .

[50]  P. Clifford,et al.  A model for spatial conflict , 1973 .

[51]  André Orléan Bayesian interactions and collective dynamics of opinion: Herd behavior and mimetic contagion , 1995 .

[52]  Claudio Altafini,et al.  Predictable Dynamics of Opinion Forming for Networks With Antagonistic Interactions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[53]  Antoine Girard,et al.  Opinion Dynamics With Decaying Confidence: Application to Community Detection in Graphs , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[54]  Leo Katz,et al.  A new status index derived from sociometric analysis , 1953 .

[55]  Xiaoming Hu,et al.  Opinion consensus of modified Hegselmann-Krause models , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[56]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..