Using Augmented Reality Prototypes in Design Education

Prototyping or model making in the Architectural and Interior Design process is an established method of design problem solving. By using prototypes, design students can better visualize structures and can give students a more concrete result when working on a design project. According to a study by Grosslight, Unger, Jay and Smith (1991), students are likely to think of prototypes as physical copies of reality that envelop various spatiotemporal views, instead of representations that envelop various theoretical perspectives. Past literature and research has suggests that student’s rate building prototypes highly when compared with other types of representations, which implies that they are better able to learn the design process when using prototypes (Lemons, Carberry, Swan & Rogers, 2010). This study documents alternate modeling strategies utilising technologies such as Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) in Architectural and Interior Design education through the Technology Acceptance Model to better understand how students perceive design solutions in early design studios. The results of the study suggest that design students found physical models to be comparable to AR models and that the AR technology was easy to use.

[1]  V.K. Viswanathan,et al.  Enhancing student innovation: Physical models in the idea generation process , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[2]  Katja Hölttä-Otto,et al.  The Effect of Prototyping and Critical Feedback on Fixation in Engineering Design , 2011, CogSci.

[3]  Zahira Merchant,et al.  Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  The Impact of Tangible User Interfaces on Designers' Spatial Cognition , 2008, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Robert J. Youmans,et al.  The effects of physical prototyping and group work on the reduction of design fixation , 2011 .

[6]  Azniah Ismail,et al.  On Improving Spatial Ability Through Computer-Mediated Engineering Drawing Instruction , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  Kees Dorst,et al.  The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application , 2011 .

[8]  Eija Kaasinen,et al.  User Acceptance of Mobile Services , 2009, Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  P. Milgram,et al.  A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays , 1994 .

[10]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts , 1991 .

[12]  Marc Aurel Schnabel,et al.  Digital and Tangible Sensation: An Augmented Reality Urban Design Studio , 2005 .

[13]  Hh Henri Achten,et al.  What Offers Virtual Reality to the Designer , 1998 .

[14]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[15]  Hannes Kaufmann,et al.  Collaborative Augmented Reality in Education , 2002 .

[16]  Kraig Finstad,et al.  The Usability Metric for User Experience , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[17]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education , 1999 .

[18]  M. Cassotti,et al.  Understanding fixation effects in creativity: A design-theory approach , 2013 .

[19]  Ngoc Vo,et al.  The effect of subliminal suggestions on Sudden Moments of Inspiration (SMI) in the design process , 2013 .

[20]  Mikael Johansson,et al.  Users' evaluation of a virtual reality architectural model compared with the experience of the completed building , 2006 .

[21]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[22]  James R. Lewis,et al.  UMUX-LITE: when there's no time for the SUS , 2013, CHI.

[23]  Kim A. Kastens,et al.  Epistemic Actions in Science Education , 2008, Spatial Cognition.

[24]  Sung Youl Park,et al.  An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[25]  Jivka Ovtcharova,et al.  Teaching Methodology for Virtual Reality Practical Course in Engineering Education , 2013, VARE.

[26]  Honglei Li,et al.  Technology acceptance model for internet banking: an invariance analysis , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[27]  Nicholas W. Kohn,et al.  Partly versus Completely Out of Your Mind: Effects of Incubation and Distraction on Resolving Fixation , 2009 .

[28]  S. Sorby Educational Research in Developing 3‐D Spatial Skills for Engineering Students , 2009 .

[29]  A. Lawson Predicting science achievement: The role of developmental level, disembedding ability, mental capacity, prior knowledge, and beliefs , 1983 .

[30]  P H Berczeller Beyond problem-solving. , 1996, Hospital practice.

[31]  Yu-Chien Chen,et al.  A study of comparing the use of augmented reality and physical models in chemistry education , 2006, VRCIA '06.

[32]  M. Turcsányi-Szabó,et al.  Augmented Reality in Education , 2018, Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning.

[33]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Role of Sunk Cost in Engineering Idea Generation: An Experimental Investigation , 2013 .

[34]  Daniel M. Wegner,et al.  The role of thought suppression in building mental blocks , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[35]  Andreas Dünser,et al.  Virtual and augmented reality as spatial ability training tools , 2006, CHINZ '06.

[36]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Incubation effects , 2013 .

[37]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Virtual Environments and the Enhancement of Spatial Behavior: Towards a Comprehensive Research Agenda , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[38]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. , 1991, The American journal of psychology.

[39]  Weidong Huang,et al.  Human Factors in Augmented Reality Environments , 2012, Springer New York.

[40]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[41]  William Buxton,et al.  Graspable user interfaces , 1996 .

[42]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[43]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[44]  Chris Rogers,et al.  The benefits of model building in teaching engineering design , 2010 .

[45]  Berczeller Ph Beyond problem-solving. , 1996 .

[46]  Brett E. Shelton,et al.  Augmented Reality and Education: Current Projects and the Potential for Classroom Learning , 2002 .

[47]  Ian Gibson,et al.  Rapid prototyping for architectural models , 2002 .