Assessment of the Dynamic Behaviour of Saturated Soil Subjected to Cyclic Loading from Offshore Monopile Wind Turbine Foundations

Abstract The fatigue life of offshore wind turbines strongly depends on the dynamic behaviour of the structures including the underlying soil. To diminish dynamic amplification and avoid resonance, the eigenfrequency related to the lowest eigenmode of the wind turbine should not coalesce with excitation frequencies related to strong wind, wave and ice loading. Typically, lateral response of monopile foundations is analysed using a beam on a nonlinear Winkler foundation model with soil–pile interaction recommended by the design regulations. However, as it will be shown in this paper, the guideline approaches consequently underestimate the eigenfrequency compared to full-scale measurements. This discrepancy leads the authors to investigate the influence of pore water pressure by utilising a numerical approach and consider the soil medium as a two-phase system consisting of a solid skeleton and a single pore fluid. In the paper, free vibration tests are analysed to evaluate the eigenfrequencies of offshore monopile wind turbine foundations. Since the stiffness of foundation and subsoil strongly affects the modal parameters, the stiffness of saturated soil due to pore water flow generated by cyclic motion of monopiles is investigated using the concept of a Kelvin model. It is found that the permeability of the subsoil has strong influence on the stiffness of the wind turbine that may to some extent explain deviations between experimental and computational eigenfrequencies.

[1]  M. E. Naggar,et al.  Dynamic analysis for laterally loaded piles and dynamic p-y curves , 2000 .

[2]  M. Bolton.  THE STRENGTH AND DILATANCY OF SANDS , 1986 .

[3]  Christian LeBlanc Bakmar.  Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Support Structures: Selected topics in the field of geotechnical engineering , 2009 .

[4]  Joseph Ray Meyer.  Analysis and Design of Pile Foundations , 1984 .

[5]  P. Robertson.  Soil classification using the cone penetration test , 1990 .

[6]  H. Matlock.  Correlation for Design of Laterally Loaded Piles in Soft Clay , 1970 .

[7]  Mehrdad Kimiaei,et al.  Cyclic lateral response of pile foundations in offshore platforms , 2012 .

[8]  Milos Novak,et al.  Nonlinear lateral interaction in pile dynamics , 1995 .

[9]  Søren Peder Hyldal Sørensen,et al.  Effects of Diameter on Initial Stiffness of P-Y Curves for Large-Diameter Piles in Sand , 2010 .

[10]  M. Randolph,et al.  The response of flexible piles to lateral loading , 1981 .

[11]  Gordon A. Fenton,et al.  Reliability-Based Deep Foundation Design , 2007 .

[12]  L. A. Padrón,et al.  Effects of soil–structure interaction on the dynamic properties and seismic response of piled structures , 2013 .

[13]  Nii Allotey,et al.  Generalized dynamic Winkler model for nonlinear soil–structure interaction analysis , 2008 .

[14]  Kazuo Konagai,et al.  Nonlinear soil-pile interaction model for dynamic lateral motion , 1992 .

[15]  Yan Huang,et al.  The dynamic ice loads on conical structures , 2013 .

[16]  Assaf Klar,et al.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of Lateral Pile Response using Two-Dimensional Explicit Numerical Scheme , 2002 .

[17]  B. R. Grubbs,et al.  Field Testing of Laterally Loaded Piles In Sand , 1974 .

[18]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Experimental validation of soil–structure interaction of offshore wind turbines , 2011 .

[19]  Michael W. O'Neill,et al.  Evaluation of p-y relationships in cohesionless soils , 1984 .

[20]  John Dalsgaard Sørensen,et al.  Natural Frequencies of Wind Turbines on Monopile Foundations in Clayey Soils: A probabilistic approach , 2012 .

[21]  Martin Achmus,et al.  Behavior of monopile foundations under cyclic lateral load , 2009 .

[22]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Dynamic soil–structure interaction of monopile supported wind turbines in cohesive soil , 2013 .

[23]  Michele Jamiolkowski,et al.  Evaluation of Relative Density and Shear Strength of Sands from CPT and DMT , 2003 .

[25]  Michael W. O'Neill,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL P-Y MODEL FOR SUBMERGED, STIFF CLAY , 1989 .

[26]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Dynamic pile‐soil‐pile interaction. Part II: Lateral and seismic response , 1992 .

[27]  Eduardo Kausel,et al.  Early history of soil–structure interaction , 2010 .

[28]  Søren Peder Hyldal Sørensen,et al.  Assessment of foundation design for offshore monopiles unprotected against scour , 2013 .

[29]  M. Kühn.  Dynamics and design optimisation of offshore wind energy conversion systems , 2001 .

[30]  Samer A. Barakat,et al.  Reliability-based optimization of laterally loaded piles , 1999 .

[31]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Cross-wind modal properties of offshore wind turbines identified by full scale testing , 2013 .

[32]  Paul Christiano,et al.  THREE-DIMENSIONAL NONLINEAR STUDY OF PILES , 1991 .

[33]  R. Cook,et al.  Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis , 1974 .

[34]  Milos Novak,et al.  Nonlinear analysis for dynamic lateral pile response , 1996 .

[35]  Peter K. Robertson,et al.  Cone-penetration testing in geotechnical practice , 1997 .