Methods to Compare Predicted and Observed Phosphene Experience in tACS Subjects

Background Phosphene generation is an objective physical measure of potential transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) biological side effects. Interpretations from phosphene analysis can serve as a first step in understanding underlying mechanisms of tACS in healthy human subjects and assist validation of computational models. Objective/Hypothesis This preliminary study introduces and tests methods to analyze predicted phosphene occurrence using computational head models constructed from tACS recipients against verbal testimonies of phosphene sensations. Predicted current densities in the eyes and the occipital lobe were also verified against previously published threshold values for phosphenes. Methods Six healthy subjects underwent 10 Hz tACS while being imaged in an MRI scanner. Two different electrode montages, T7-T8 and Fpz-Oz, were used. Subject ratings of phosphene experience were collected during tACS and compared against current density distributions predicted in eye and occipital lobe regions of interest (ROIs) determined for each subject. Calculated median current densities in each ROI were compared to minimum thresholds for phosphene generation. Main Results All subjects reported phosphenes, and predicted median current densities in ROIs exceeded minimum thresholds for phosphenes found in the literature. Higher current densities in the eyes were consistently associated with decreased phosphene generation for the Fpz-Oz montage. There was an overall positive association between phosphene perceptions and current densities in the occipital lobe. Conclusions These methods may have promise for predicting phosphene generation using data collected during in-scanner tACS sessions and may enable better understanding of phosphene origin. Additional empirical data in a larger cohort is required to fully test the robustness of the proposed methods. Future studies should include additional montages that could dissociate retinal and occipital stimulation.

[1]  Rosalind J. Sadleir,et al.  Low-Frequency Conductivity Tensor Imaging of the Human Head In Vivo Using DT-MREIT: First Study , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Frank Tong,et al.  Foundations of Vision , 2018 .

[3]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Direct effects of transcranial electric stimulation on brain circuits in rats and humans , 2018, Nature Communications.

[4]  W. Bosking,et al.  Saturation in Phosphene Size with Increasing Current Levels Delivered to Human Visual Cortex , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Michael Schär,et al.  Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[6]  Dennis J. L. G. Schutter,et al.  Cutaneous retinal activation and neural entrainment in transcranial alternating current stimulation: A systematic review , 2016, NeuroImage.

[7]  Munish Chauhan,et al.  Changing head model extent affects finite element predictions of transcranial direct current stimulation distributions , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  Rosalind J. Sadleir,et al.  Projected current density comparison in tDCS block and smooth FE modeling , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[9]  N. Wenderoth,et al.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  A. Engel,et al.  Entrainment of Brain Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2014, Current Biology.

[12]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Computational analysis shows why transcranial alternating current stimulation induces retinal phosphenes , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[13]  A. Antal,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  L. Parra,et al.  Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  B. Krekelberg,et al.  Transcranial electrical stimulation over visual cortex evokes phosphenes with a retinal origin. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  L. Merabet,et al.  Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[17]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates cortical excitability as assessed by TMS-induced phosphene thresholds , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  Rosalind J. Sadleir,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model , 2010, NeuroImage.

[19]  Walter Paulus,et al.  On the difficulties of separating retinal from cortical origins of phosphenes when using transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  Dennis J. L. G. Schutter,et al.  Retinal origin of phosphenes to transcranial alternating current stimulation , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  M. Bikson,et al.  Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[22]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Electrical Stimulation of the Visual Cortex , 2008, Current Biology.

[23]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Modulation of moving phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation of V1 in human , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Stefan Skare,et al.  How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging , 2003, NeuroImage.

[25]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  William D Meek,et al.  Atlas of the Visible Human Male: Reverse Engineering of the Human Body , 1997, The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

[27]  Morton W. Miller,et al.  Sensitivity of the Human Eye to Power Frequency Electric Fields , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Diana Deutsch,et al.  Psychophysical Judgment and the Process of Perception edited by H.‐G. Geissler, P. Petzold, H.F.J.M. Buffart, and Yu. M. Zarodin , 1984 .

[29]  P. Å. Öberg,et al.  Magneto- and electrophosphenes: A comparative study , 1980, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[30]  R. Stephenson.  A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[31]  G. Brindley,et al.  The site of electrical excitation of the human eye , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[33]  W. Hager,et al.  and s , 2019, Shallow Water Hydraulics.

[34]  W Paulus,et al.  Both the cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception are modulated in a frequency-specific manner during transcranial alternating current stimulation. , 2013, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[35]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[36]  D. Purpura,et al.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.