Emergence of division of labour in halictine bees: contributions of social interactions and behavioural variance

A central question in the study of insect societies concerns the emergence of division of labour. Among the different models of division of labour, the threshold model postulates that it can emerge from initial interindividual differences in the propensity to perform a task. The requirements of this variance-based model are likely to be present at the origins of sociality and may thus contribute to the emergence of division of labour in early social evolution. However, social interactions among members of the incipient groups are also likely to shape the genesis of division of labour. In this study, we compared task performance and social interactions during nest construction in forced associations of the solitary halictine bee, Lasioglossum (Ctenonomia) NDA-1, and of the communal Lasioglossum (Chilalictus) hemichalceum. We recorded and compared individual behaviours during nest construction for pairs of solitary or communal bees. These data were compared, in turn, to the excavation behaviours of the same bees while alone to determine how the presence of a social group influenced task performance. We additionally measured social interactions of pairs outside the context of nest construction. Pairs of solitary bees displayed higher levels of division of labour than communal pairs. A numerical model implementing behavioural rules derived from experiments suggests that in communal bees, division of labour can be primarily explained by differences in task propensity. In solitary bees, both behavioural asymmetry and social interactions contribute significantly to division of labour. These results are discussed in the framework of social transitions in halictine bees.

[1]  J. Mitani,et al.  Social and spatial aspects of male subgrouping in a community of wild chimpanzees , 2003 .

[2]  G. Buckle Queen-worker behavior and nesmate interactions in young colonies ofLasioglossum Zephyrum , 1982, Insectes Sociaux.

[3]  Jörg Eder,et al.  Chemistry and biology of social insects. , 1987 .

[4]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  The ontogeny of the interaction structure in bumble bee colonies: A MIRROR model , 1983, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  L. Keller Queen number and sociality in insects , 1993 .

[6]  W. Wcislo Social interactions and behavioral context in a largely solitary bee, Lasioglossum (Dialictus) figueresi (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) , 1997, Insectes Sociaux.

[7]  C. Plateaux-Quénu Construction et évolution annuelle du nid d'Evylæus calceatus Scopoli (Hym., Halictinæ) avec quelques considérations sur la division du travail dans les sociétés monogynes et digynes , 1973, Insectes Sociaux.

[8]  C. Patterson,et al.  Division of Labor Among Lesbian and Heterosexual Parenting Couples: Correlates of Specialized Versus Shared Patterns , 2004 .

[9]  C. Michener,et al.  Were workers of eusocial hymenoptera initially altruistic or oppressed? , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  W. Wcislo The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids: Behavioral environments of sweat bees (Halictinae) in relation to variability in social organization , 1997 .

[11]  M. West-Eberhard Developmental plasticity and evolution , 2003 .

[12]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Self-Organization in Biological Systems , 2001, Princeton studies in complexity.

[13]  Sandra D. Mitchell,et al.  Self-organization and the evolution of division of labor , 1998 .

[14]  C. Michener Reproduction and Castes in Social Halictine Bees , 1990 .

[15]  B. Danforth,et al.  Phylogeny of eusocial Lasioglossum reveals multiple losses of eusociality within a primitively eusocial clade of bees (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). , 2003, Systematic biology.

[16]  W. Wcislo,et al.  Secondarily solitary: the evolutionary loss of social behavior. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  C. Morrison,et al.  Colony defense and behavioral differentiation in the eusocial shrimp Synalpheus regalis , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  C. Michener From Solitary to Eusocial: Need There Be a Series of Intervening Species? , 1985 .

[19]  J. Gerard,et al.  Interactions and associations between age and sex classes in mouflon sheep (Ovis gmelini) during winter , 2000, Behavioural Processes.

[20]  R E Page,et al.  The evolution of insect societies. , 1997, Endeavour.

[21]  R. Gadagkar,et al.  Dominance relationship in the establishment of reproductive division of labour in a primitively eusocial wasp (Ropalidia marginata) , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  Charles D. Michener,et al.  Bee Societies. (Book Reviews: The Social Behavior of the Bees. A Comparative Study) , 1974 .

[23]  J. Fewell Social Insect Networks , 2003, Science.

[24]  B. Danforth,et al.  Australian Lasioglossum + Homalictus form a monophyletic group: resolving the "Australian enigma". , 2001, Systematic biology.

[25]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[26]  P. Stander,et al.  Cooperative hunting in lions: the role of the individual , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[27]  E. Wilson The Insect Societies , 1974 .

[28]  S. O’Donnell Worker biting interactions and task performance in a swarm-founding eusocial wasp (Polybia occidentalis, Hymenoptera: Vespidae) , 2001 .

[29]  W. Wcislo,et al.  Solitary behavior in a high-altitude population of the social sweat bee Halictus rubicundus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  T. Monnin,et al.  Dominance hierarchy and reproductive conflicts among subordinates in a monogynous queenless ant , 1999 .

[31]  M. West-Eberhard Flexible strategy and social evolution , 1987 .

[32]  Bernard J. Crespi,et al.  The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids: Acknowledgements , 1997 .

[33]  Jerram L. Brown,et al.  Animal Societies: Theories and Facts , 1987 .

[34]  J. Fewell,et al.  Models of division of labor in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[35]  C. Michener,et al.  Evolution of Sociality in Insects , 1972, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[36]  S. W. Batra Behavior of the social bee,Lasioglossum zephyrum, within the nest (Hymenoptera: Halictidæ) , 1964, Insectes Sociaux.

[37]  P. Kukuk,et al.  Effects of familiarity and nestmate number on social interactions in two communal bees, Andrena scotica and Panurgus calcaratus (Hymenoptera, Andrenidae) , 1999, Insectes Sociaux.

[38]  P. J. B. Slater,et al.  Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology Edited by Bert Hölldobler & Martin Lindauer. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer (1985). Pp. xiv+488. Price DM 148.00 , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  Robert E. Page,et al.  The emergence of division of labour in forced associations of normally solitary ant queens , 1999 .

[40]  D. Desor,et al.  Behavioural differentiation of rats confronted to a complex diving-for-food situation , 2002, Behavioural Processes.

[41]  M. Schwarz,et al.  Halictine Social Evolution: The Australian Enigma , 1976, Science.

[42]  G. Buckle Differentiation of Queens and Nestmate Interactions in Newly Established Colonies of Lasioglossum zephyrum (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) , 1982 .

[43]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  A model of animal movements in a bounded space. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[44]  Behavioral plasticity: levels of sociality in bees , 2003, Current Biology.

[45]  G. C. Eickwort,et al.  The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids: The evolution of social behavior in the augochlorine sweat bees (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) based on a phylogenetic analysis of the genera , 1997 .

[46]  B. Danforth Evolution of sociality in a primitively eusocial lineage of bees , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Walter R. Tschinkel,et al.  Ritualized conflict in Odontomachus brunneus and the generation of interaction-based task allocation: a new organizational mechanism in ants , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  W. J. Bell,et al.  Agonistic behavior, social interactions, and behavioral specialization in a primitively eusocial bee , 1978, Insectes Sociaux.

[49]  G. K. Sage,et al.  Reproductivity and relatedness in a communal halictine beeLasioglossum (Chilalictus) hemichalceum , 1994, Insectes Sociaux.

[50]  G. Robinson,et al.  Genetic basis for division of labor in an insect society , 1989 .

[51]  H. Hofer,et al.  Behavioral processes and costs of co-existence in female spotted hyenas: a life history perspective , 2003, Evolutionary Ecology.

[52]  J. Fewell,et al.  Division of labor and the evolution of task sharing in queen associations of the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[53]  B. Cole Dominance hierarchies in leptothorax ants. , 1981, Science.

[54]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Task partitioning, division of labour and nest compartmentalisation collectively isolate hazardous waste in the leafcutting ant Atta cephalotes , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[55]  C. Michener,et al.  Interactions in Colonies of Primitively Social Bees: Artificial Colonies of Lasioglossum zephyrum. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  E. R. Brown,et al.  DOMINANCE, AGE, AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS IN A COMPLEX SOCIETY: A LONG-TERM STUDY OF THE MEXICAN JAY , 1997 .

[58]  S. O’Donnell The development of biting interactions and task performance in a tropical eusocial wasp , 2003 .

[59]  W. Engels,et al.  Social Insects: An Evolutionary Approach to Castes and Reproduction , 2011 .

[60]  Root Gorelick,et al.  Normalized Mutual Entropy in Biology: Quantifying Division of Labor , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[61]  M. Breed,et al.  Behavioral Control of Workers by Queens in Primitively Eusocial Bees , 1977, Science.

[62]  E. V. von Wettberg,et al.  A novel social polymorphism in a primitively eusocial bee , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.