A Theory of High-Order Statistics-Based Virtual Dimensionality for Hyperspectral Imagery

Virtual dimensionality (VD) has received considerable interest in its use of specifying the number of spectrally distinct signatures present in hyperspectral data. Unfortunately, it never defines what such a signature is. For example, various targets of interest, such as anomalies and endmembers, should be considered as different types of spectrally distinct signatures and have their own different values of VD. Specifically, these targets are insignificant in terms of signal energies due to their relatively small populations. Accordingly, their contributions to second-order statistics (2OS) are rather limited. In this case, 2OS-based methods such as eigen-approaches to determine VD may not be effective in determining how many such type of signal sources as spectrally distinct signatures are. This paper develops a new theory that expands 2OS-VD theory to a high-order statistics (HOS)-based VD, called HOS-VD theory. Since there is no counterpart of the characteristic polynomial equation used to find eigenvalues in 2OS available for HOS, a direct extension is inapplicable. This paper re-invents a wheel by finding actual targets directly from the data rather than eigenvectors/singular vectors used in 2OS-VD theory which do not represent any real targets in the data. Consequently, comparing to 2OS-VD theory which can only be used to estimate the value of VD without finding real targets, the developed HOS-VD theory can accomplish both of tasks at the same time, i.e., determining the value of VD as well as finding actual targets directly from the data.

[1]  Wei Xiong,et al.  Maximum Orthogonal Subspace Projection Approach to Estimating the Number of Spectral Signal Sources in Hyperspectral Imagery , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[2]  Bin Luo,et al.  Empirical Automatic Estimation of the Number of Endmembers in Hyperspectral Images , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[3]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Principal components, minor components, and linear neural networks , 1992, Neural Networks.

[4]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  David Malah,et al.  Rank Estimation and Redundancy Reduction of High-Dimensional Noisy Signals With Preservation of Rare Vectors , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  G. Swayze The hydrothermal and structural history of the Cuprite mining district, southwestern Nevada: An integrated geological and geophysical approach , 1997 .

[7]  Peter Bajorski Does virtual dimensionality work in hyperspectral images? , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[8]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Estimation of signal subspace on hyperspectral data , 2005, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[9]  Marco Diani,et al.  A New Algorithm for Robust Estimation of the Signal Subspace in Hyperspectral Images in the Presence of Rare Signal Components , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  D. Chakrabarti,et al.  A fast fixed - point algorithm for independent component analysis , 1997 .

[11]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Hyperspectral Data Processing: Algorithm Design and Analysis , 2013 .

[12]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Component Analysis-Based Unsupervised Linear Spectral Mixture Analysis for Hyperspectral Imagery , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Marco Diani,et al.  Hyperspectral Signal Subspace Identification in the Presence of Rare Signal Components , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  J. Hüsler Extremes and related properties of random sequences and processes , 1984 .

[15]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Automatic spectral target recognition in hyperspectral imagery , 2003 .

[16]  Peter Bajorski,et al.  Second Moment Linear Dimensionality as an Alternative to Virtual Dimensionality , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Edmund R. Malinowski,et al.  Theory of error in factor analysis , 1977 .

[18]  José M. P. Nascimento,et al.  Signal subspace identification in hyperspectral imagery , 2012 .

[19]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  How to design synthetic images to validate and evaluate hyperspectral imaging algorithms , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[20]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[21]  Edmund R. Malinowski,et al.  Determination of the number of factors and the experimental error in a data matrix , 1977 .

[22]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Hyperspectral Subspace Identification , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  A Review of Unsupervised Spectral Target Analysis for Hyperspectral Imagery , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[24]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Second order statistics target-specified virtual dimensionality , 2013, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[25]  Chein-I. Chang Hyperspectral Imaging: Techniques for Spectral Detection and Classification , 2003 .

[26]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  A Fast Fixed-Point Algorithm for Independent Component Analysis , 1997, Neural Computation.

[27]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Improved Process for Use of a Simplex Growing Algorithm for Endmember Extraction , 2009, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[28]  Chein-I. Chang,et al.  Linear Spectral Mixture Analysis Based Approaches to Estimation of Virtual Dimensionality in Hyperspectral Imagery , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  Qian Du,et al.  Automatic target recognition for hyperspectral imagery using high-order statistics , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.