Automatic pedicle screw planning using atlas-based registration of anatomy and reference trajectories

PURPOSE An algorithm for automatic spinal pedicle screw planning is reported and evaluated in simulation and first clinical studies. Methods. A statistical atlas of the lumbar spine (N=40 members) was constructed for Active Shape Model (ASM) registration of target vertebrae to an unsegmented patient CT. The atlas was augmented to include "reference" trajectories through the pedicles as defined by a spinal neurosurgeon. Following ASM registration, the trajectories are transformed to the patient CT and accumulated to define a patient-specific screw trajectory, diameter, and length. The algorithm was evaluated in leave-one-out analysis (N=40 members) and for the first time in a clinical study (N = 5 patients undergoing cone-beam CT (CBCT) guided spine surgery), and in simulated low-dose CBCT images. Results. ASM registration achieved (2.0 ± 0.5)mm root-mean-square-error (RMSE) in surface registration in 96% of cases, with outliers owing to limitations in CT image quality (high noise/slice thickness). Trajectory centerlines were conformant to the pedicle in 95% of cases. For all non-breaching trajectories, automatically defined screw diameter and length were similarly conformant to the pedicle and vertebral body (98.7%, Grade A/B). The algorithm performed similarly in CBCT clinical studies (93% centerline and screw conformance) and was consistent at the lowest dose levels tested. Average runtime in planning five-level (lumbar) bilateral screws (10 trajectories) was (312.1 ± 104.0)s. The runtime per level for ASM registration was (41.2 ± 39.9)s, and the runtime per trajectory was (4.1 ± 0.8)s, suggesting a runtime of ~(45.3 ± 39.9)s with a more fully parallelized implementation. Conclusions. The algorithm demonstrated accurate, automatic definition of pedicle screw trajectories, diameter, and length in CT images of the spine without segmentation. The studies support translation to clinical studies in free-hand or robot-assisted spine surgery, quality assurance, and data analytics in which fast trajectory definition is a benefit to workflow. .

[1]  Runze Han,et al.  Automatic trajectory and instrument planning for robot-assisted spine surgery , 2019, Medical Imaging.

[2]  Samuel Kadoury,et al.  Computer-assisted pedicle screw placement planning: Towards clinical practice , 2018, 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018).

[3]  Mohammadreza Etemadifar,et al.  Evaluating Accuracy of Free-hand Pedicle Screw Insertion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Postoperative Multi-Slice Computed Tomography Scan , 2017, Advanced biomedical research.

[4]  Yoshito Otake,et al.  Low-dose preview for patient-specific, task-specific technique selection in cone-beam CT. , 2014, Medical physics.

[5]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  A New 2.5D Representation for Lymph Node Detection Using Random Sets of Deep Convolutional Neural Network Observations , 2014, MICCAI.

[6]  Alexander Ghasem,et al.  The Arrival of Robotics in Spine Surgery: A Review of the Literature , 2018, Spine.

[7]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images , 1994, Image Vis. Comput..

[8]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Accuracy and workflow of navigated spinal instrumentation with the mobile AIRO® CT scanner , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[9]  Takashi Hirai,et al.  Lumbosacral pedicle screw placement using a fluoroscopic pedicle axis view and a cannulated tapping device , 2015, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[10]  Francesco Amato,et al.  Multi atlas based segmentation: should we prefer the best atlas group over the group of best atlases? , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Ibrahim Tekdemir,et al.  Lumbar pedicle: surgical anatomic evaluation and relationships , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[12]  S. Gertzbein,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicular Screw Placement In Vivo , 1990, Spine.

[13]  W J Montgomery,et al.  Spinal fixation. Part 3. Complications of spinal instrumentation. , 1993, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[14]  Kang Yan,et al.  A method of lumbar pedicle screw placement optimization applied to guidance techniques , 2016 .

[15]  Nobuhiko Hata,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2014 , 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[16]  Andriy Myronenko,et al.  Point Set Registration: Coherent Point Drift , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  J. Webster Stayman,et al.  Improved intraoperative imaging in spine surgery: clinical translation of known-component 3D image reconstruction on the O-arm system , 2019, Medical Imaging.

[18]  P. Anderson,et al.  Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis management. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: Atlas selection and its effect on accuracy , 2009, NeuroImage.

[20]  Anil Sethi,et al.  Lumbar pedicle screw placement: Using only AP plane imaging , 2012, Indian journal of orthopaedics.

[21]  A Uneri,et al.  Spinal pedicle screw planning using deformable atlas registration , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al.  Automatic vertebrae localization in spine CT: a deep-learning approach for image guidance and surgical data science , 2019, Medical Imaging.

[23]  A Uneri,et al.  Known-component 3D–2D registration for quality assurance of spine surgery pedicle screw placement , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Runze Han,et al.  Clustered iterative sub-atlas registration for improved deformable registration using statistical shape models , 2018, Medical Imaging.

[25]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  Computer-Assisted Screw Size and Insertion Trajectory Planning for Pedicle Screw Placement Surgery , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Philippe C. Cattin,et al.  Statismo - A framework for PCA based statistical models , 2012, The Insight Journal.

[27]  Ioan A. Lina,et al.  Techniques and accuracy of thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement. , 2014, World journal of orthopedics.

[28]  J. Gower.  Generalized procrustes analysis , 1975 .

[29]  Hirotaka Chikuda,et al.  Diameter, Length, and Direction of Pedicle Screws for Scoliotic Spine: Analysis by Multiplanar Reconstruction of Computed Tomography , 2009, Spine.

[30]  Runze Han,et al.  SpineCloud: image analytics for predictive modeling of spine surgery outcomes , 2020, Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures.

[31]  M. Gutberlet,et al.  Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in lumbar and sacral spine: comparison between free-hand and O-arm based navigation techniques , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[32]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  A multi-center milestone study of clinical vertebral CT segmentation , 2016, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[33]  Alexander Mason,et al.  The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using intraoperative image guidance systems. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[34]  Paul Park,et al.  Current applications of robotics in spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature. , 2017, Neurosurgical focus.

[35]  A Uneri,et al.  WE-AB-BRA-07: Operating Room Quality Assurance (ORQA) for Spine Surgery Using Known-Component 3D-2D Image Registration. , 2016, Medical physics.

[36]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  OBBTree: a hierarchical structure for rapid interference detection , 1996, SIGGRAPH.