An utility-based decision support sustainability model in slow steaming maritime operations

This paper analyses slow steaming sustainability initiatives and generalizes the traditional discrete cost-based decision support model into novel continuous utility-based models. Two models based on logarithmic and linear utility functions are developed for risk-averse and risk-neutral decision makers respectively. The models, considering fuel consumption, carbon emission, and on time delivery, are applied to a Trans-pacific trade service route. A sensitivity analysis is conducted on parameters of sailing distance, expected transit time, quantity, and emission policies. The model contributes to ship liners on the optimal speed decisions in continuous utility-based slow steaming operations.

[1]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Green shipping practices in the shipping industry : conceptualization, adoption, and implications , 2011 .

[2]  A. Stromman,et al.  Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and cost by shipping at lower speeds , 2011 .

[3]  David Pisinger,et al.  The Vessel Schedule Recovery Problem (VSRP) - A MIP model for handling disruptions in liner shipping , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Charging and rate control for elastic traffic , 1997, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[5]  Pierre Cariou,et al.  Is slow steaming a sustainable means of reducing CO2 emissions from container shipping , 2011 .

[6]  Jens Hetland,et al.  In search of a sustainable hydrogen economy: How a large-scale transition to hydrogen may affect the primary energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions , 2007 .

[7]  C. Hope,et al.  The social cost of carbon in U.S. regulatory impact analyses: an introduction and critique , 2012, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences.

[8]  P. Marlow,et al.  The effect of green supply chain management on green performance and firm competitiveness in the context of container shipping in Taiwan , 2013 .

[9]  Michael R. Beauregard,et al.  The Basics of FMEA , 1996 .

[10]  Zhiyuan Liu,et al.  Bunker consumption optimization methods in shipping: A critical review and extensions , 2013 .

[11]  R. Tol The Economic Effects of Climate Change , 2009 .

[12]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Reduction of emissions along the maritime intermodal container chain: operational models and policies , 2011 .

[13]  Eugene Y. C. Wong,et al.  Supply chain decarbonisation in shipping and logistics transportation , 2013 .

[14]  Biagio Ciuffo,et al.  Estimating air emissions from ships: Meta-analysis of modelling approaches and available data sources , 2011 .

[15]  Stefan Voß,et al.  Slow Steaming in Container Shipping , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  David Gibbs,et al.  The role of sea ports in end-to-end maritime transport chain emissions , 2014 .

[17]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  The importance of economies of scale for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from shipping , 2012 .

[18]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  The design of coastal shipping services subject to carbon emission reduction targets and state subsidy levels , 2014 .

[19]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2018 , 2014, Earth System Science Data.

[20]  Henry Y. K. Lau,et al.  Supply Chain Decarbonisation - A Cost-Based Decision Support Model in Slow Steaming Maritime , 2014 .

[21]  Jacques Leonardi,et al.  A method for assessing the carbon footprint of maritime freight transport: European case study and results , 2010 .

[22]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Balancing the economic and environmental performance of maritime transportation , 2010 .

[23]  Hwa-Joong Kim,et al.  An epsilon-optimal algorithm considering greenhouse gas emissions for the management of a ship’s bunker fuel , 2012 .

[24]  Hadi Shirouyehzad,et al.  The FMEA Approach to Identification of Critical Failure Factors in ERP Implementation , 2011 .

[25]  Marjorie Doudnikoff,et al.  Effect of a speed reduction of containerships in response to higher energy costs in Sulphur Emission Control Areas , 2014 .

[26]  Ali E. Abbas Decomposing the Cross Derivatives of a Multiattribute Utility Function into Risk Attitude and Value , 2011, Decis. Anal..

[27]  Irina Gribkovskaia,et al.  Reducing emissions through speed optimization in supply vessel operations , 2013 .

[28]  R. Kitamura A model of daily time allocation to discretionary out-of-home activities and trips , 1984 .

[29]  Victor N. Armstrong Vessel optimisation for low carbon shipping , 2013 .

[30]  Xiangtong Qi,et al.  Minimizing fuel emissions by optimizing vessel schedules in liner shipping with uncertain port times , 2012 .

[31]  James J. Corbett,et al.  The effectiveness and costs of speed reductions on emissions from international shipping , 2009 .

[32]  C. L. Sheng A general utility function for decision-making , 1984 .

[33]  P. Eng CO2 emissions from fuel combustion: highlights , 2009 .

[34]  Gongzhu Hu,et al.  Effects of Utility Functions on Network Response Time and Optimization , 2012, Software and Network Engineering.

[35]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Speed models for energy-efficient maritime transportation: A taxonomy and survey , 2013 .

[36]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .