Methods for meta-analysis in genetic association studies: a review of their potential and pitfalls

[1]  Nikolaos A Patsopoulos,et al.  Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  J. Gallacher,et al.  Turning the pump handle: evolving methods for integrating the evidence on gene-disease association. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  Evangelos Evangelou,et al.  Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses of Genome-Wide Association Investigations , 2007, PloS one.

[4]  Qizhai Li,et al.  Flexible design for following up positive findings. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  P. Donnelly,et al.  New models of collaboration in genome-wide association studies: the Genetic Association Information Network , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[6]  Jon Wakefield,et al.  A Bayesian measure of the probability of false discovery in genetic epidemiology studies. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[7]  Lester L. Peters,et al.  Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci , 2007, Nature.

[8]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Replicating genotype–phenotype associations , 2007, Nature.

[9]  John P.A. Ioannidis,et al.  Non-Replication and Inconsistency in the Genome-Wide Association Setting , 2007, Human Heredity.

[10]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Replication of Genome-Wide Association Signals in UK Samples Reveals Risk Loci for Type 2 Diabetes , 2007, Science.

[11]  Marcia M. Nizzari,et al.  Genome-Wide Association Analysis Identifies Loci for Type 2 Diabetes and Triglyceride Levels , 2007, Science.

[12]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings , 2007, Clinical trials.

[13]  G. Abecasis,et al.  A Genome-Wide Association Study of Type 2 Diabetes in Finns Detects Multiple Susceptibility Variants , 2007, Science.

[14]  M. Jarvelin,et al.  A Common Variant in the FTO Gene Is Associated with Body Mass Index and Predisposes to Childhood and Adult Obesity , 2007, Science.

[15]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Genetic effects versus bias for candidate polymorphisms in myocardial infarction: case study and overview of large-scale evidence. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  Thomas A Trikalinos,et al.  The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey , 2007, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[17]  L. Smeeth,et al.  Genetics of Ischaemic Stroke among Persons of Non-European Descent: A Meta-Analysis of Eight Genes Involving ∼ 32,500 Individuals , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[18]  George Liberopoulos,et al.  Selection in Reported Epidemiological Risks: An Empirical Assessment , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[19]  Wolfgang Viechtbauer,et al.  Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments , 2007, Psychometrika.

[20]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Bayesian meta‐analysis and meta‐regression for gene–disease associations and deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Meta-Analysis in Genome-Wide Association Datasets: Strategies and Application in Parkinson Disease , 2007, PLoS ONE.

[22]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  The Emergence of Networks in Human Genome Epidemiology: Challenges and Opportunities , 2007, Epidemiology.

[23]  D. Blacker,et al.  Systematic meta-analyses of Alzheimer disease genetic association studies: the AlzGene database , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[24]  S. Ganesh,et al.  Association of gene polymorphism with genetic susceptibility to stroke in Asian populations: a meta-analysis , 2006, Journal of Human Genetics.

[25]  J. Sterne,et al.  The publication process itself was the major cause of publication bias in genetic epidemiology. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  A. Donner,et al.  The Merits of Testing Hardy‐Weinberg Equilibrium in the Analysis of Unmatched Case‐Control Data: A Cautionary Note , 2006, Annals of human genetics.

[27]  B. Sibai,et al.  Sample Bias Among Women With Retained DNA Samples for Future Genetic Studies , 2006, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  Roger M Harbord,et al.  A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Common genetic variants for breast cancer: 32 largely refuted candidates and larger prospects. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[30]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  An empirical evaluation of multifarious outcomes in pharmacogenetics: beta-2 adrenoceptor gene polymorphisms in asthma treatment , 2006, Pharmacogenetics and genomics.

[31]  I. Olkin,et al.  The case of the misleading funnel plot , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  A. Uitterlinden,et al.  The Association between Common Vitamin D Receptor Gene Variations and Osteoporosis: A Participant-Level Meta-Analysis , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[33]  D. Reich,et al.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[34]  M. Khoury,et al.  Tracking the epidemiology of human genes in the literature: the HuGE Published Literature database. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[35]  Muin J. Khoury,et al.  The path from genome-based research to population health: Development of an international public health genomics network , 2006, Genetics in Medicine.

[36]  Thomas A Trikalinos,et al.  Family-Based versus Unrelated Case-Control Designs for Genetic Associations , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[37]  J. Ioannidis.  Commentary: grading the credibility of molecular evidence for complex diseases. , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[38]  M. Khoury,et al.  Make it HuGE: human genome epidemiology reviews, population health, and the IJE. , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[39]  Tania B. Huedo-Medina,et al.  Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? , 2006, Psychological methods.

[40]  A. Uitterlinden,et al.  Large-Scale Evidence for the Effect of the COLIA1 Sp1 Polymorphism on Osteoporosis Outcomes: The GENOMOS Study , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[41]  A. Sutton,et al.  Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. , 2006, JAMA.

[42]  C. Sudlow,et al.  Does apolipoprotein E genotype influence the risk of ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage? Systematic review and meta-analyses of 31 studies among 5961 cases and 17,965 controls. , 2006, Stroke.

[43]  G. Abecasis,et al.  Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[44]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Journals Should Publish All “Null” Results and Should Sparingly Publish “Positive” Results , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[45]  H. Bickeböller,et al.  Case‐Control Association Tests Correcting for Population Stratification , 2006, Annals of human genetics.

[46]  Paolo Vineis,et al.  A road map for efficient and reliable human genome epidemiology , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[47]  W. Willett,et al.  A candidate gene approach to searching for low-penetrance breast and prostate cancer genes , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[48]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Local Literature Bias in Genetic Epidemiology: An Empirical Evaluation of the Chinese Literature , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[49]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[50]  P. Royle,et al.  Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes , 2005, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[51]  D. Duggan,et al.  Recent developments in genomewide association scans: a workshop summary and review. , 2005, American journal of human genetics.

[52]  Christopher H Schmid,et al.  In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[53]  Jinbo Chen,et al.  Genetic Variation and Willingness to Participate in Epidemiologic Research: Data from Three Studies , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[54]  David R. Jones,et al.  How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[55]  Paolo Vineis,et al.  A network of investigator networks in human genome epidemiology. , 2005, American journal of epidemiology.

[56]  J. Ioannidis.  Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[57]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Selective reporting biases in cancer prognostic factor studies. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[58]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  CTLA-4 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to type 1 diabetes mellitus: a HuGE Review and meta-analysis. , 2005, American journal of epidemiology.

[59]  K. Furie,et al.  Dose-Related Association of MTHFR 677T Allele With Risk of Ischemic Stroke: Evidence From a Cumulative Meta-Analysis , 2005, Stroke.

[60]  Thomas A Trikalinos,et al.  Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: the Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[61]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Statistical Methods for Eliciting Probability Distributions , 2005 .

[62]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences , 2005, JAMA.

[63]  D. Hunter.  Gene–environment interactions in human diseases , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[64]  P. Harrison,et al.  Profiling early head and neck cancer , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[65]  M. Daly,et al.  Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[66]  D. Altman,et al.  Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[67]  L. Smeeth,et al.  For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from Elsevier Ltd Homocysteine and Stroke: Evidence on a Causal Link from Mendelian Randomisation , 2022 .

[68]  Marcus R. Munafò,et al.  Assessing publication bias in genetic association studies: evidence from a recent meta-analysis , 2004, Psychiatry Research.

[69]  A. Hingorani,et al.  Meta-analysis of genetic studies in ischemic stroke: thirty-two genes involving approximately 18,000 cases and 58,000 controls. , 2004, Archives of neurology.

[70]  D. Altman,et al.  Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research , 2004, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[71]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Establishment of genetic associations for complex diseases is independent of early study findings , 2004, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[72]  A. Hrõbjartsson,et al.  Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. , 2004, JAMA.

[73]  Norman Boyd,et al.  The Breast Cancer Family Registry: an infrastructure for cooperative multinational, interdisciplinary and translational studies of the genetic epidemiology of breast cancer , 2004, Breast Cancer Research.

[74]  C. Hoggart,et al.  Design and analysis of admixture mapping studies. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.

[75]  M Y Wong,et al.  Estimation of magnitude in gene–environment interactions in the presence of measurement error , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[76]  Nathaniel Rothman,et al.  Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[77]  Muin J Khoury,et al.  Mendelian randomisation: a new spin or real progress? , 2003, The Lancet.

[78]  F. Collins,et al.  Welcome to the genomic era. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[79]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[80]  P. Newcomb,et al.  Selection bias in the assessment of gene-environment interaction in case-control studies. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[81]  Ammarin Thakkinstian,et al.  Meta-analyses of molecular association studies: methodologic lessons for genetic epidemiology. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[82]  L. Cardon,et al.  Population stratification and spurious allelic association , 2003, The Lancet.

[83]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  'Mendelian randomization': can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? , 2003, International journal of epidemiology.

[84]  E. Lander,et al.  Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[85]  P. Hartge,et al.  Joint effect of genes and environment distorted by selection biases: implications for hospital-based case-control studies. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[86]  C. Weinberg,et al.  Reporting, appraising, and integrating data on genotype prevalence and gene-disease associations. , 2002, American journal of epidemiology.

[87]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Commentary: meta-analysis of individual participants' data in genetic epidemiology. , 2002, American journal of epidemiology.

[88]  A. Whittemore,et al.  Comparison of DNA‐ and RNA‐Based Methods for Detection of Truncating BRCA1 Mutations , 2002, Human mutation.

[89]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[90]  S. Thompson,et al.  How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[91]  Nathaniel Rothman,et al.  Counterpoint: bias from population stratification is not a major threat to the validity of conclusions from epidemiological studies of common polymorphisms and cancer. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[92]  J. Hirschhorn,et al.  A comprehensive review of genetic association studies , 2002, Genetics in Medicine.

[93]  L. Stewart,et al.  To IPD or not to IPD? , 2002, Evaluation & the health professions.

[94]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice , 2002, Journal of health services research & policy.

[95]  H. Ullum,et al.  Effects of CCR5- 32, CCR2-64I, and SDF-1 3A Alleles on HIV-1 Disease Progression: An International Meta-Analysis of Individual-Patient Data , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[96]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Replication validity of genetic association studies , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[97]  L. Wasserman,et al.  Genomic control, a new approach to genetic-based association studies. , 2001, Theoretical population biology.

[98]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Association of Collagen Iα 1 Sp1 Polymorphism with the Risk of Prevalent Fractures: A Meta‐Analysis , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[99]  G A Satten,et al.  Accounting for unmeasured population substructure in case-control studies of genetic association using a novel latent-class model. , 2001, American journal of human genetics.

[100]  Jonathan A C Sterne,et al.  Sifting the evidence—what's wrong with significance tests? , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[101]  H. Ullum,et al.  Effects of CCR5-Delta32, CCR2-64I, and SDF-1 3'A alleles on HIV-1 disease progression: An international meta-analysis of individual-patient data. , 2001, Annals of internal medicine.

[102]  Alex J. Sutton,et al.  Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research , 2000 .

[103]  N. Rothman,et al.  Population stratification in epidemiologic studies of common genetic variants and cancer: quantification of bias. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[104]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Association mapping in structured populations. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[105]  S Duval,et al.  Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis , 2000, Biometrics.

[106]  J. Little,et al.  N-acetyltransferase polymorphisms and colorectal cancer: a HuGE review. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[107]  J. L. Tang,et al.  Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[108]  Quanhe Yang,et al.  5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene variants and congenital anomalies: a HuGE review. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[109]  I. Olkin,et al.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .

[110]  J. Little,et al.  Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and colorectal cancer: a HuGE review. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[111]  M. Egger,et al.  The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. , 1999, JAMA.

[112]  S Greenland,et al.  Random-effects meta-analyses are not always conservative. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[113]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Clinical epidemiological quality in molecular genetic research: the need for methodological standards. , 1999, JAMA.

[114]  M. Khoury,et al.  The Human Genome Epidemiology Network. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[115]  J. Goedert,et al.  Genetic effects on HIV disease progression , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[116]  S. Thompson,et al.  Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[117]  Stephen P. Brooks,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo method and its application , 1998 .

[118]  J. Ioannidis.  Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials. , 1998, JAMA.

[119]  Christopher H Schmid,et al.  Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough , 1998, The Lancet.

[120]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.

[121]  C. Lengeler,et al.  Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German , 1997, The Lancet.

[122]  G. Cooper,et al.  Are vitamin D receptor polymorphisms associated with bone mineral density? A meta‐analysis , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[123]  B. Rosner,et al.  Data trawling: to fish or not to fish , 1996, The Lancet.

[124]  C H Schmid,et al.  Cumulative meta-analysis of clinical trials builds evidence for exemplary medical care. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[125]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[126]  C. Begg,et al.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. , 1994, Biometrics.

[127]  S Greenland,et al.  Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[128]  R. Hayes,et al.  (Continued on next page) , 1934 .

[129]  M. Parmar,et al.  Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? , 1993, The Lancet.

[130]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. , 1992, JAMA.

[131]  P. Easterbrook,et al.  Publication bias in clinical research , 1991, The Lancet.

[132]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[133]  R. Peto,et al.  Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials. , 1985, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[134]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[135]  W. G. Cochran.  The combination of estimates from different experiments. , 1954 .