Conjoint psychometric field estimation for bilateral audiometry

Behavioral testing in perceptual or cognitive domains requires querying a subject multiple times in order to quantify his or her ability in the corresponding domain. These queries must be conducted sequentially, and any additional testing domains are also typically tested sequentially, such as with distinct tests comprising a test battery. As a result, existing behavioral tests are often lengthy and do not offer comprehensive evaluation. The use of active machine-learning kernel methods for behavioral assessment provides extremely flexible yet efficient estimation tools to more thoroughly investigate perceptual or cognitive processes without incurring the penalty of excessive testing time. Audiometry represents perhaps the simplest test case to demonstrate the utility of these techniques. In pure-tone audiometry, hearing is assessed in the two-dimensional input space of frequency and intensity, and the test is repeated for both ears. Although an individual’s ears are not linked physiologically, they share many features in common that lead to correlations suitable for exploitation in testing. The bilateral audiogram estimates hearing thresholds in both ears simultaneously by conjoining their separate input domains into a single search space, which can be evaluated efficiently with modern machine-learning methods. The result is the introduction of the first conjoint psychometric function estimation procedure, which consistently delivers accurate results in significantly less time than sequential disjoint estimators.

[1]  Xinyu D Song,et al.  Bayesian active probabilistic classification for psychometric field estimation , 2017, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[2]  Jay I. Myung,et al.  Optimal experimental design for model discrimination. , 2009, Psychological review.

[3]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Fast, Continuous Audiogram Estimation Using Machine Learning , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[4]  D. Wall,et al.  Prevalence of hearing loss in the United States by industry. , 2013, American journal of industrial medicine.

[5]  J. Cunningham,et al.  Expectation Propagation as a Way of Life , 2020 .

[6]  A. Watson,et al.  QUEST+: A general multidimensional Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. , 2017, Journal of vision.

[7]  Mark A. Eckert,et al.  Classifying Human Audiometric Phenotypes of Age-Related Hearing Loss from Animal Models , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[8]  Frederick A. A. Kingdom,et al.  Psychophysics : A Practical Introduction Ed. 2 , 2016 .

[9]  C. Krakau,et al.  AN AUTOMATIC STATIC PERIMETER, DESIGN AND PILOT STUDY , 1975, Acta ophthalmologica.

[10]  Roman Garnett,et al.  Active Learning of Linear Embeddings for Gaussian Processes , 2013, UAI.

[11]  Emily Buss,et al.  Psychometric functions for pure tone intensity discrimination: slope differences in school-aged children and adults. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  F. Wightman,et al.  Psychometric functions for children's detection of tones in noise. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Statistical models for neural encoding, decoding, and optimal stimulus design. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[14]  N. Prins Psychophysics: A Practical Introduction , 2009 .

[15]  D. Cohen Direct estimation of multidimensional perceptual distributions: Assessing hue and form , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  C. DiMattina Fast adaptive estimation of multidimensional psychometric functions. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[17]  Kamiar Rahnama Rad,et al.  Efficient, adaptive estimation of two-dimensional firing rate surfaces via Gaussian process methods , 2010, Network.

[18]  Yi Shen,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the auditory filter. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Nicolaas Prins,et al.  The psychometric function: the lapse rate revisited. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[20]  Summarizing pure-tone hearing thresholds: The equipollence of components of the audiogram , 1989 .

[21]  Methodological implications of interaural correlation: Count heads not ears , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Stanley Lemeshow,et al.  The Multiple Logistic Regression Model , 2013 .

[23]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[24]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[25]  William A. Gale,et al.  A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers , 1994, SIGIR '94.

[26]  Kechen Zhang,et al.  Adaptive stimulus optimization for sensory systems neuroscience , 2013, Front. Neural Circuits.

[27]  J. Jerger,et al.  Preferred Method For Clinical Determination Of Pure-Tone Thresholds , 1959 .

[28]  Emily Buss,et al.  Development and the role of internal noise in detection and discrimination thresholds with narrow band stimuli. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Faheema Mahomed,et al.  Validity of Automated Threshold Audiometry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[30]  Pierre L. Divenyi,et al.  In defense of the right and left audiograms: A reply to Coren (1989) and Coren and Hakstian (1990) , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  D. Foster,et al.  Model-free estimation of the psychometric function , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Roman Garnett,et al.  Psychometric function estimation by probabilistic classification. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Tom Minka,et al.  Expectation Propagation for approximate Bayesian inference , 2001, UAI.

[34]  Robert J. Butera,et al.  Sequential Optimal Design of Neurophysiology Experiments , 2009, Neural Computation.

[35]  Gustav Theodor Fechner,et al.  Elements of psychophysics , 1966 .

[36]  Tim Gollisch,et al.  From response to stimulus: adaptive sampling in sensory physiology , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[37]  Mijung Park,et al.  Adaptive Bayesian Methods for Closed-Loop Neurophysiology , 2016 .

[38]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Psychophysical Detection Testing with Bayesian Active Learning , 2015, UAI.

[39]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Bayesian Active Learning for Classification and Preference Learning , 2011, ArXiv.

[40]  Jeff Miller,et al.  On the analysis of psychometric functions: The Spearman-Kärber method , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[42]  Luis A. Lesmes,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of threshold versus contrast external noise functions: The quick TvC method , 2006, Vision Research.

[43]  David Barber,et al.  Bayesian Classification With Gaussian Processes , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[44]  Mijung Park,et al.  Active learning of neural response functions with Gaussian processes , 2011, NIPS.

[45]  H. Rootzén,et al.  A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[46]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[47]  C. Tyler,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold , 1999, Vision Research.

[48]  Tuomas J. Lukka,et al.  Bayesian adaptive estimation: The next dimension , 2006 .