Evaluation of the Undrained Shear Strength of Organic Soils from a Dilatometer Test Using Artificial Neural Networks

The undrained shear strength of organic soils can be evaluated based on measurements obtained from the dilatometer test using singleand multi-factor empirical correlations presented in the literature. However, the empirical methods may sometimes show relatively high values of maximum relative error. Therefore, a method for evaluating the undrained shear strength of organic soils using artificial neural networks based on data obtained from a dilatometer test and organic soil properties is presented in this study. The presented neural network, with an architecture of 5-4-1, predicts the normalized undrained shear strength based on five independent variables: the normalized net value of a corrected first pressure reading (po − uo)/σ′v, the normalized net value of a corrected second pressure reading (p1 − uo)/σ′v, the organic content Iom, the void ratio e, and the stress history indictor (oc or nc). The neural model presented in this study provided a more reliable prediction of the undrained shear strength in comparison to the empirical methods, with a maximum relative error of ±10%.

[1]  P. Robertson Soil Behavior Type using the DMT , 2015 .

[3]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Neural Networks in Civil Engineering: 1989–2000 , 2001 .

[4]  L. Cao,et al.  Analysis of Dilatometer Test in Clay , 2015 .

[5]  Harry G. Poulos,et al.  Stress deformation and strength characteristics , 1977 .

[6]  S. Lacasse,et al.  SPT, CPT, pressuremeter testing and recent developments on in situ testing , 1990 .

[7]  Alan J. Lutenegger,et al.  Current status of the Marchetti dilatometer test , 1990 .

[8]  John P. Carter,et al.  ANALYSIS OF THE DILATOMETER TEST IN UNDRAINED CLAY , 1993 .

[9]  S. Marchetti A New In Situ Test for the Measurement of Horizontal Soil Deformity , 1975 .

[10]  Timothy Masters,et al.  Practical neural network recipes in C , 1993 .

[11]  Toshiyuki Mitachi,et al.  Coefficient of earth pressure at rest for normally and overconsolidated peat ground in Hokkaido area , 2012 .

[12]  Prabir Kumar Basudhar,et al.  Undrained lateral load capacity of piles in clay using artificial neural network , 2006 .

[13]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  State of the Art of Artificial Neural Networks in Geotechnical Engineering , 2008 .

[14]  A. Lutenegger Cavity expansion model to estimate undrained shear strength in soft clay from dilatometer , 2006 .

[15]  Silvano Marchetti,et al.  In Situ Tests by Flat Dilatometer , 1980 .

[16]  S. Marchetti Some 2015 Updates to the TC 16 DMT Report 2001 , 2015 .

[17]  Guido Bugmann,et al.  NEURAL NETWORK DESIGN FOR ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS , 2001 .

[18]  Maria Jolanta Sulewska Applying Artificial Neural Networks for analysis of geotechnical problems , 2017 .

[19]  D. Muir Wood,et al.  A neural network for error prediction in a true triaxial apparatus with flexible boundaries , 2005 .

[20]  L. Bjerrum,et al.  Embankments on Soft Ground , 1973 .

[21]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK APPLICATIONS IN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING , 2001 .

[23]  W. Y. Byeon,et al.  Application of Flat DMT And ANN to Korean Soft Clay Deposits For Reliable Estimation of Undrained Shear Strength , 2006 .

[24]  Fernando Schnaid,et al.  In Situ Testing in Geomechanics: The Main Tests , 2008 .

[25]  Silvano Marchetti,et al.  The Flat Dilatometer Test (DMT) in Soil Investigations - A Report by the ISSMGE Committee TC16 , 2006 .

[26]  Application of the MCC Model for the Estimation of Undrained Geotechnical Parameters of Clays from Dilatometer Tests , 2015 .